Minimum

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a formidable combination for Minimum, delivering playable frame rates at every tested resolution. The data shows this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at 4K with High settings, and at 1440p and 1080p it can max out the Ultra preset with substantial headroom. This system is not merely capable; it is overqualified for the game's demands, with performance scaling that suggests the CPU becomes a limiting factor only at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which produces an average of 60 FPS exactly. While the Medium preset delivers a higher average of 71 FPS, High is the superior choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing the playable threshold. The Ultra preset falls short at 45 FPS average, making it unsuitable for a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system can handle the Ultra preset without issue, achieving an average of 84 FPS. This is the best possible setting, and the performance headroom is significant—the data shows a 40% performance increase over the 4K High result. The lower presets are all playable, but there is no reason to use them given the Ultra preset's comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset is again the top choice, delivering an impressive average of 131 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, providing a highly responsive experience. The data indicates that even the most demanding settings are easily handled at this resolution, making it the optimal choice for competitive or high-refresh-rate play.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU. The RTX 3080 is the dominant component at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the frame rate drop from 131 FPS at 1080p Ultra to 84 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and further to 45 FPS at 4K Ultra. This 65% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K highlights the GPU's increasing workload as pixel count rises.

Conversely, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU is less strained. At 1080p, the difference between Low (267 FPS) and Ultra (131 FPS) settings shows a 136 FPS gap, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough frames to push beyond 200 FPS, but the GPU's workload at Ultra settings tempers this. The i5-13400F's strong multi-threaded performance, with a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314, ensures it is not a bottleneck in this scenario.

The data suggests that at 1440p, the balance shifts toward a more GPU-bound scenario. The transition from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra results in a 47 FPS drop (131 to 84), which is a 36% reduction. This is less severe than the 4K drop, indicating that the GPU is still the primary limiter, but the CPU's headroom is being reduced. At 4K, the Ultra preset's 45 FPS average is strictly a GPU limitation, as the CPU's performance is far above what is needed for this load.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this CPU and GPU pairing ranks #1051 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the top 28% of all systems tested, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The ranking reflects the overall balance of the system; the RTX 3080's 68th percentile standing among all GPUs is complemented by the i5-13400F's 77th percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, both with average scores nearly identical to the i5-13400F (a delta of 0% and 0.4%, respectively). This means the CPU is performing as expected for its class. The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA P106-100 and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, have average scores that are slightly lower (a delta of -0.3% and -0.4%), confirming the RTX 3080's position in the upper mid-range tier.

This ranking suggests that while the combo is not in the top echelon, it is far above the median system. For a game like Minimum, which is not extremely demanding by modern standards, this rank indicates a high level of performance headroom. The system is clearly positioned to handle this title with ease, as evidenced by the measured FPS across all resolutions.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160, the system achieves 60 FPS average on High settings and 71 FPS on Medium. The Ultra preset is not playable, as it drops to 45 FPS average.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 84 FPS. This is the highest quality option and remains well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The GPU is the primary performance driver at all resolutions, particularly at 4K where the Ultra preset's 45 FPS average shows a clear GPU bottleneck. The CPU's influence is more visible at 1080p, where frame rates can exceed 200 FPS on lower settings.

Q: How does this system compare to other tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 1051st out of 3712 tested, placing it in the top 28% of all systems. This is a strong result, indicating the hardware is well-matched for the game's requirements.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 131 FPS. This provides a very smooth experience with significant headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the 4K High preset a viable option for consistent gameplay?

A: Yes, the 4K High preset delivers an average of 60 FPS, which exactly meets the playable threshold. While it lacks the headroom of lower resolutions, it is technically playable.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the frame rates are as follows:

• Ultra: 45 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• High: 60 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• Medium: 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.
• Low: 93 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates are:

• Ultra: 84 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• High: 110 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• Medium: 132 FPS average, with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 151 FPS.
• Low: 172 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the frame rates are:

• Ultra: 131 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• High: 171 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.
• Medium: 204 FPS average, with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 235 FPS.
• Low: 267 FPS average, with no min/max data recorded.

The data shows a consistent pattern: higher resolutions and settings reduce frame rates, but the system maintains playability at all settings except 4K Ultra. The min/max data for Medium settings at each resolution indicates low variance, which is a sign of stable performance.

The Verdict

This PC can definitively run Minimum, and it does so with notable authority. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best being High at exactly 60 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best at 84 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra leading at 131 FPS.

The system's weakest point is 4K Ultra, which fails to hit the 60 FPS target with its 45 FPS average. However, this is a minor caveat given that the High preset at 4K is fully playable. For most users, the 1440p Ultra experience at 84 FPS will be the sweet spot, offering a high level of visual quality with smooth performance. The RTX 3080's capabilities are well-matched with the i5-13400F's processing power, resulting in a system that is more than sufficient for this title across all common gaming resolutions.