Minimum

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a high-performing combination for Minimum, capable of delivering smooth frame rates at every resolution tested. The data indicates that this combo ranks at 1281 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the upper third of all systems. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares the components to their nearest rivals, and provides a clear verdict on which settings and resolutions will clear the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this configuration each have close rivals that would produce similar benchmark results, though their in-game performance can vary. For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the nearest rivals are a mix of mobile and desktop processors with very similar average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS has an average score of 25284, which is essentially identical to the i5-13400F's 25292 score, showing a delta of 0%. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both score slightly higher at 25362 and 25365 respectively, putting them 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H trails slightly with a score of 25201, which is 0.4% behind. In practical terms, these CPUs should deliver nearly interchangeable frame rates in Minimum, as the single-threaded performance differences are minimal.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has an average benchmark score of 11627, which places it at the 51st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a wider range of performance deltas. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11680, putting it 0.5% ahead of the RX 7800 XT. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M scores 11528, which is 0.9% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla K20c scores 11479, trailing by 1.3%. Finally, the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 11842, leading the RX 7800 XT by 1.8%. These benchmarks suggest that while the RX 7800 XT is a strong performer, its raw compute scores are surprisingly close to older or lower-tier cards in synthetic tests. However, the measured FPS data for Minimum shows the RX 7800 XT delivering very high frame rates, indicating the game is not heavily dependent on raw GPU compute power.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results for Minimum reveal that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings, ranging from an average of 121.3 FPS at Ultra to 248.5 FPS at Low. This massive scaling between settings points to the GPU being the limiting factor, as lowering graphical presets directly increases FPS. The CPU is clearly capable of feeding the GPU at this resolution, as even the highest frame rates do not show signs of a CPU bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops by roughly 34-35% across all settings compared to 1080p. For example, High settings drop from 158.7 FPS to 105.6 FPS, while Ultra drops from 121.3 FPS to 79.2 FPS. This consistent percentage drop indicates that the GPU is still the primary driver of performance, but the load is shifting. The CPU's role becomes more balanced with the GPU at this resolution, as the frame rates are lower and require less CPU throughput.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop further, with High settings averaging 57 FPS and Ultra averaging 44.2 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is less steep than from 1080p to 1440p, showing a 46% reduction in High settings (105.6 to 57 FPS) and a 44% reduction in Ultra (79.2 to 44.2 FPS). At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, has ample headroom to handle the game logic at these lower frame rates. The data suggests that for Minimum, the RX 7800 XT is the component that determines playability at all resolutions, with the i5-13400F providing sufficient performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at 1080p Low settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across three resolutions and four quality presets. All measurements are average FPS values, with no minimum or maximum frame rate data provided. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional. Low settings produce an average of 248.5 FPS, making the game feel incredibly responsive. Medium settings average 189.6 FPS, High settings average 158.7 FPS, and even Ultra settings maintain a high average of 121.3 FPS. All settings at this resolution far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, indicating outstanding performance.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high. Low settings average 163.1 FPS, Medium settings average 123.2 FPS, and High settings average 105.6 FPS. Ultra settings still deliver a smooth 79.2 FPS average. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for this combo, as even the most demanding preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. The scaling between presets is consistent, with each step down in quality yielding roughly a 20-25% increase in FPS.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes more varied. Low settings average 85.7 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 67.3 FPS, narrowly clearing the 60 FPS mark. High settings drop to an average of 57 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. Ultra settings average 44.2 FPS, which is noticeably below the threshold. The data shows that 4K gaming is possible, but only with reduced settings. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is significant, with Ultra delivering roughly half the frame rate of Low. This indicates that the GPU is being pushed to its limits at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combo ranks 1281 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 34.5% of all systems tested for Minimum. This is a solid ranking that reflects the combo's ability to deliver high frame rates at most resolutions and settings. The rank suggests that there are many other combinations that perform better, but also a large number that perform worse. Given that this combo can clear 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 1080p Ultra, the ranking is appropriate for a system that is capable but not at the absolute top tier of performance.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 out of 100 indicates it is a strong processor, outperforming the majority of CPUs in the database. The GPU's percentile ranking of 51 out of 100 is more moderate, placing it just above the median. This discrepancy is interesting, as the GPU is the component that drives frame rates in Minimum at higher resolutions. The combination of a high-percentile CPU with a mid-percentile GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but less suited for 4K gaming at high settings.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum with playable frame rates at all resolutions, though the settings must be adjusted accordingly. According to the verdict data, at 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best playable option delivering an average of 67.3 FPS. High and Ultra settings are not playable at this resolution, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable. The best setting is Ultra, which delivers an average of 79.2 FPS. This means users can enjoy the game at maximum quality while still maintaining a smooth experience. At 1920x1080, all settings are also playable, with Ultra delivering an excellent 121.3 FPS average. For the best visual experience, 1440p Ultra is the recommended configuration, as it balances high quality with frame rates well above the playable threshold. For maximum smoothness, 1080p Low offers an incredibly high 248.5 FPS, suitable for competitive play.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1080p?*

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 121.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p for this combo?

A: The verdict data shows that all presets are playable at 2560x1440, but the best setting is Ultra, which delivers an average of 79.2 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this CPU and GPU combination?

A: Yes, but only at Low and Medium settings. Low averages 85.7 FPS and Medium averages 67.3 FPS at 3840x2160. High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, which is identical to the Ryzen 9 6900HS's score of 25284, showing a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 105.6 FPS.

Q: Does the GPU or CPU limit performance more at 4K resolution?

A: The data shows that GPU is the limiting factor at 3840x2160, as frame rates drop significantly compared to 1440p, indicating the RX 7800 XT is the bottleneck at this resolution.