Minimum

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT presents a balanced mid-range combination for running Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The data indicates that this setup delivers high frame rates at standard resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and graphical presets increase. The benchmark results show a clear curve, where the system excels at 1080p and 1440p, but faces limitations at 4K with higher settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares the components to their nearest rivals, and provides a definitive answer on what settings are required for a smooth 60 FPS experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the benchmark data for the components reveals which other hardware would yield similar performance in Minimum. For the processor, the Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals, according to the data, are a mix of mobile and desktop chips. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, a negligible 0% difference. The Intel Core 5 120 is nearly identical with a score of 25362, showing a -0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D also scores 25365, another -0.3% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a 0.4% delta. In practice, any of these CPUs would provide a nearly identical experience, as the performance margins are within statistical noise.

For the graphics card, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT holds an average benchmark score of 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are somewhat older or mobile parts. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X scores 25891, a 0.5% delta, indicating near-parity. The AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25856, a 0.6% delta. The AMD FirePro D700 is even closer, with a score of 25842 and a 0.7% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile shows a 1.1% delta with a score of 25740. In terms of raw frame rates for Minimum, swapping the RX 6750 XT for any of these GPUs would result in a very similar performance profile, though the desktop-oriented architecture of the RX 6750 XT might exhibit different driver-level behavior in specific scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 runs at an average of 106.4 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold of 60 FPS. All other presets at this resolution also exceed 60 FPS, with Low running at 215.9 FPS.

*Q: Can this PC handle 4K gaming at Minimum's High preset?*

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average frame rate drops to 51.1 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable setting at 4K is Low, which achieves 72 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, while the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284. The delta is 0%, indicating their performance is effectively identical in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the GPU more powerful than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a higher average benchmark score of 26011 compared to the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile's score of 25740. The RX 6750 XT is 1.1% faster in this metric.

Q: What is the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 138.8 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 67.3 FPS. This represents a performance drop of over half when moving to the highest quality settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four presets. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 215.9 FPS. Moving to Medium yields 162.1 FPS, and High settings produce 136.9 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a robust 106.4 FPS average. Every setting at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong, though the scaling is more pronounced. The Low preset averages 138.8 FPS, which is a significant drop from 1080p but still very high. Medium settings average 103.6 FPS, High settings average 89.7 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 67.3 FPS. The Ultra preset is still playable, but the margin over the 60 FPS threshold is slim, at just 7.3 FPS.

The 3840x2160 results show a clear limit for this hardware. Low settings at 4K average 72 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. Medium settings fall to 57.9 FPS, which is below 60 FPS. High settings average 51.1 FPS, and Ultra settings are the most demanding, yielding only 35.7 FPS. The data shows a steep decline in performance as resolution and settings increase, with the system struggling to maintain playable frame rates at 4K beyond the Low preset.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT can run Minimum effectively, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1080p achieves an average of 106.4 FPS, offering a smooth and visually rich experience.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is also positive. The data shows that all four presets are playable. The Ultra preset averages 67.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS requirement, making high-quality 1440p gaming feasible. For the most demanding settings, this resolution is a viable option, though the frame rate margin is tighter than at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The system is only playable on the Low preset, which achieves an average of 72 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 57.9 FPS, and High and Ultra are not playable, with averages of 51.1 FPS and 35.7 FPS respectively. For 4K gaming, users must accept Low settings to maintain a stable frame rate above the playable threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1685 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the upper portion of the database, indicating that it performs better than a majority of other system configurations. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's solid rasterization capabilities. While it is not at the top of the list, the combo sits comfortably above the median, which aligns with its ability to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings. The data suggests that this pairing is a capable mid-range option, though it is not designed for extreme 4K performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is as follows. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 106.4 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity while still offering a significant performance buffer over the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best option, with an average of 67.3 FPS. While this is above the playable threshold, the margin is smaller than at 1080p. Users can still enjoy maximum settings at this resolution, but they should be aware that there is less headroom for demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only setting that meets the 60 FPS requirement, averaging 72 FPS. This is the best playable setting for 4K, as the next step up, Medium, drops to 57.9 FPS. For a 4K experience, users must sacrifice visual quality to maintain smooth performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the CPU and GPU contribute to performance in Minimum across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high, with the Low preset hitting 215.9 FPS. This suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to saturate its capabilities, and the GPU is the primary limiter. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 215.9 FPS to 106.4 FPS, a difference of 109.5 FPS, which indicates that the GPU's workload is the main factor as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the performance drop from 1080p is noticeable. The Low preset goes from 215.9 FPS at 1080p to 138.8 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 77.1 FPS. This is a larger relative drop than the CPU's benchmark scores would suggest, indicating that the GPU is becoming more stressed at this resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 71.5 FPS (from 138.8 to 67.3), which shows that the GPU's processing power is the dominant factor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The Low preset at 4K averages 72 FPS, which is far lower than the 138.8 FPS seen at 1440p. The scaling from 1440p to 4K on Low settings shows a 66.8 FPS drop, while the difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 36.3 FPS (from 72 to 35.7). The data points to the GPU being overwhelmingly responsible for performance at this resolution, as the CPU's multi-threaded score of 25292 is sufficient for the game's demands, but the GPU's fill rate and shading power are insufficient for high settings at 4K.