Minimum

Minimum is a 2014 third-person shooter, and the data for the Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT shows a system that is more than capable of handling it at high frame rates across most settings. The benchmark results indicate that this combination delivers playable performance at every resolution tested, with the only limitation appearing at 4K Ultra settings. The CPU’s 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake architecture, boosting to 4.60 GHz, provides ample headroom, while the RDNA 2-based GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 128-bit bus handles the graphical load efficiently. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: as resolution drops, the average FPS increases dramatically, making this a versatile setup for competitive play or high-fidelity visuals depending on the user’s preference.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS varies by resolution, and the data reveals distinct sweet spots for each.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the only playable setting is Low, which produces an average of 60.6 FPS. This is a narrow margin above the 60 FPS threshold, so the system is technically playable but leaves almost no headroom for demanding scenes. Medium drops to 49.1 FPS, and High falls to 37.1 FPS, while Ultra is the least viable at 28.2 FPS. For 4K gaming, stick to Low to ensure a consistent experience.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the best playable preset is High, delivering an average of 72.4 FPS. This is a comfortable margin above the threshold, allowing for smooth gameplay with enhanced visual fidelity. Medium runs at 89.8 FPS, and Low at 112.5 FPS, both well above 60 FPS. Ultra, however, drops to 54.2 FPS, which falls short of the playable threshold, so it is not recommended at this resolution.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system reaches its full potential, with Ultra being the best playable setting at an average of 88.4 FPS. This is a strong result, offering high visual quality with substantial performance headroom. High runs at 114.3 FPS, Medium at 136.7 FPS, and Low at 178.3 FPS, all far exceeding the 60 FPS requirement. At 1080p, users can max out the game without concern.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 60.6, which just clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium (49.1 FPS), High (37.1 FPS), and Ultra (28.2 FPS) all fall below this threshold.

Q: What is the best visual preset for 1440p gaming on this hardware?

A: High settings are the most demanding preset that stays playable, with an average of 72.4 FPS. This provides a significant improvement over Medium (89.8 FPS) and Low (112.5 FPS) while still maintaining a smooth experience. Ultra is not viable at 1440p, as it averages 54.2 FPS.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: The combo runs Ultra settings at an average of 88.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 1080p the only resolution where the game can be fully maxed out without any performance compromises.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data does not isolate individual component bottlenecks, but the GPU’s performance percentile is 65% versus the CPU’s 77%, suggesting the graphics card is the more likely constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as 22,604 in Cinebench R23, indicate it has ample processing power for this title.

Q: Are the measured FPS values based on real-world testing?

A: Yes, the "dataIsMeasured" field is true, meaning the FPS figures are from actual benchmark runs rather than estimates. The average FPS values are provided for each resolution and settings combination, though minimum and maximum FPS data are not available.

Q: What does the combo rank tell us about this PC’s performance?

A: The combination ranks 2,414th out of 3,712 tested combos, placing it in the top 35% of all systems. This indicates it is a solid mid-range performer, though not at the top tier for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the system scales across resolutions and settings. All values are average FPS, as minimum and maximum figures are not recorded.

At 3840x2160, the performance hierarchy is clear. Low settings yield 60.6 FPS, which is the only entry above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium produces 49.1 FPS, High drops to 37.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 11.5 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High is 12.0 FPS, indicating a steep performance cost for each quality increase at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the system shows much stronger results. Low runs at 112.5 FPS, more than double the 4K Low figure. Medium achieves 89.8 FPS, High reaches 72.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 54.2 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 58.3 FPS, showing that even at 1440p, the highest preset carries a significant penalty. Notably, the step from High to Ultra is 18.2 FPS, the largest single-step drop at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well. Low hits 178.3 FPS, Medium runs at 136.7 FPS, High achieves 114.3 FPS, and Ultra still manages 88.4 FPS. Every setting is far above the 60 FPS threshold, with even the lowest preset providing nearly triple the required frame rate. The scaling from Ultra to High is a 25.9 FPS improvement, while moving from High to Medium adds 22.4 FPS, and Medium to Low adds 41.6 FPS.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: the performance cost of Ultra settings is substantial, but the system remains playable at lower presets. The only resolution where all settings fail to reach 60 FPS is 4K, where Ultra is 31.8 FPS below the threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware might behave similarly in this game.

For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the closest matches in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core 5 120 with a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D with a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H with a delta of 0.4%. These CPUs all have average scores between 25,201 and 25,365, compared to the i5-13400F’s 25,292. In practice, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, as the game is likely not CPU-bound at the tested settings. The Ryzen 7 6800H is the closest match, with a score 0.4% higher, while the Intel Core 5 120 and Ryzen 5 5600X3D are 0.3% lower.

For the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla K40m with a delta of -0.6%, the AMD FirePro D300 with a delta of 0.7%, the AMD FirePro W7000 with a delta of -0.7%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 with a delta of 0.8%. These GPUs have average scores ranging from 19,602 to 19,905, compared to the RX 6650 XT’s 19,765. The Quadro K5200 is the closest in score, 0.8% higher, while the FirePro D300 is 0.7% higher. The Tesla K40m and FirePro W7000 are both slightly lower. Users with any of these GPUs should expect similar performance to the RX 6650 XT, meaning the same playable settings at each resolution apply.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Minimum, and it does so with room to spare at most settings. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the system is playable only on Low, with an average of 60.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, High is the best playable preset, averaging 72.4 FPS, with Low and Medium also viable. At 1920x1080, Ultra is playable at 88.4 FPS, and all other presets exceed 114 FPS.

For users with a 1080p monitor, this is an excellent setup for Minimum, as the game can be run at maximum settings with high frame rates. At 1440p, High settings offer a good balance of visuals and performance, though Ultra should be avoided. At 4K, the system is borderline playable only on Low, making it a less appealing option for those with high-resolution displays. Overall, the data shows this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K performance being a compromise.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination ranks 2,414th out of 3,712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the 65th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the competition. The rank reflects a balanced mid-range system that is well above average for this game.

Given the playable thresholds, this ranking makes sense: the system achieves 60+ FPS at every resolution except 4K Ultra, and it excels at 1080p. The rank is not top-tier, as more powerful GPUs and CPUs would push higher frame rates, but it is a strong performer for the hardware class. Users can expect a smooth experience in most scenarios, with the only significant limitation being 4K high-fidelity gaming.