Minimum

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-13400F sits in a tightly contested portion of the CPU benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 25292 places it within a fraction of several comparable processors. The closest match is the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, which scores 25284, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both score 25362 and 25365 respectively, each trailing the i5-13400F by 0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, putting it 0.4 percent ahead of the i5-13400F. In practical terms, any of these four CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Minimum, assuming the GPU is not the limiting factor. The i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for this title, and the single-thread score of 960 in 3dMark places it well above the threshold where CPU bottlenecks would appear in a third-person shooter from this era.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT posts an average benchmark score of 16361. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351, which is 0.1 percent slower. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.3 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, also 0.3 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads this group with 16504, 0.9 percent above the RX 5700 XT. These deltas are negligible for gaming purposes; the RX 5700 XT would produce virtually identical frame rates to any of these cards in Minimum. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for this game's texture loads at any resolution tested.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes relatively more relevant at 1080p, though even there the GPU remains the primary bottleneck. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 58 FPS on Low settings to 37 FPS on High, a 36 percent reduction. This scaling is almost entirely attributable to the RX 5700 XT's pixel throughput. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 960 and multi-thread score of 7314 indicate it can feed frames well above what the GPU can render at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern persists but with more headroom. Low settings produce 107 FPS, while High settings yield 69 FPS. The gap between Low and High here is 35 percent, similar to the 4K scaling. The CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution; the GPU's raw fill rate and shader output determine the ceiling. At 1920x1080, Low settings hit 166 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage 82 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium reduces frame rate by 23 percent (166 to 127), and from Medium to High by another 16 percent (127 to 107). These reductions are consistent with GPU-bound rendering rather than CPU limitations. If the i5-13400F were the bottleneck, the frame rates would cluster together across settings, which they do not.

The data indicates that for Minimum, the RX 5700 XT is the component to watch. The i5-13400F's 16 threads and 20 MB of shared L3 cache provide more than enough processing power for this title's AI, physics, and game logic. Even at 1080p Ultra, where the CPU would be most stressed, the 82 FPS average shows no sign of CPU saturation.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RX 5700 XT and i5-13400F combination struggles to maintain smooth gameplay across most presets. Low settings produce an average of 58 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 44 FPS average, with a recorded minimum of 38 FPS and maximum of 51 FPS. High settings average 37 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 28 FPS. None of these presets clear the 60 FPS bar at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture improves significantly. Low settings deliver 107 FPS average, which is well above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 82 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and maximum of 94 FPS. High settings hold at 69 FPS average. Ultra settings drop to 53 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. The data shows that High is the most demanding preset that stays playable at this resolution, with a comfortable 9 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 1920x1080, the combination performs strongly across the board. Low settings produce 166 FPS average. Medium settings average 127 FPS, with a minimum of 108 FPS and maximum of 147 FPS. High settings hit 107 FPS. Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, still hold at 82 FPS average. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest recorded average (Ultra) sitting 22 FPS above the playable line.

The Verdict

The verdict from the database is straightforward. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings for this combination. The best result is 58 FPS on Low, which misses the 60 FPS threshold by 2 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind, with averages of 44, 37, and 28 FPS respectively. Players targeting 4K will need a different GPU or must accept sub-60 frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the combination is playable on Low, Medium, and High presets. The best playable setting is High, which averages 69 FPS. This leaves 9 FPS of headroom above the threshold, meaning minor scene complexity spikes should not push the frame rate below 60 for extended periods. Ultra at 53 FPS is not playable by the database's standard.

At 1920x1080, the combination is playable at every preset. The most demanding option, Ultra, averages 82 FPS, which is 22 FPS above the playable threshold. This is the recommended resolution for this pairing, as it provides both visual fidelity and a comfortable performance margin. The i5-13400F and RX 5700 XT can run Minimum at 1080p without compromise, and at 1440p with High settings as the ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested combinations in the database for Minimum, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2758 out of 3712 combinations. That places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is expected given that the RX 5700 XT is an end-of-life product from 2019. The CPU, however, is a modern part with a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 77 percent of processors in the database. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the limiting factor here.

The rank of 2758 reflects the GPU's age and its inability to handle 4K in this title. For context, the combination's performance at 1440p and 1080p is solid, but the 4K results drag the overall ranking down. Players with this hardware should target 1080p or 1440p for the best experience, as the data shows the GPU simply does not have enough throughput for 4K in Minimum.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra is 82, which is 22 FPS above the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High settings are playable at 1440p, with an average of 69 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution average 53 FPS, which does not meet the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. The best 4K result is 58 FPS on Low settings, which falls 2 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets at 3840x2160 produce averages between 28 and 44 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 5700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 5700 XT's average benchmark score of 16361 is within 0.9 percent of its nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is 0.1 percent slower, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 are each 0.3 percent faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 0.9 percent faster.

Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25292 is nearly identical to its rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is 0 percent different, the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are each 0.3 percent slower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is 0.4 percent faster.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: 1920x1080 is the best resolution. Every preset at 1080p clears 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 82 FPS. At 1440p, only Low, Medium, and High are playable, and at 4K no preset reaches 60 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset meets the 60 FPS threshold. The closest result is Low settings at 58 FPS average, but this falls short of the playable standard. Players at this resolution must either reduce resolution or accept frame rates below 60.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, which produces an average of 69 FPS. This provides a 9 FPS buffer above the threshold. Medium settings average 82 FPS, and Low averages 107 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining playable.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding playable preset is Ultra, with an average of 82 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for this resolution. The 22 FPS margin above the threshold ensures that demanding scenes with multiple enemies or heavy effects should still hold near 60 FPS. Medium and High settings provide higher averages of 127 and 107 FPS respectively, but Ultra delivers the full visual experience without sacrificing playability.