Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
229 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
112 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
72 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
79 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
6.8ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,208

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 61 79
1440p QHD 72 95 113 148
1080p Full HD 112 147 175 229

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 147
1920x1080 Low 229
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 Ultra 112
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 148
2560x1440 Medium 113
2560x1440 Ultra 72
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The data for Minimum shows that the Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination provides a robust experience across most modern resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as settings and pixel counts rise. The measured frame rates indicate that this pairing is particularly well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K requires a more conservative approach to settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher is Medium, which delivers an average of 61 FPS. While the Low preset achieves a higher average of 79 FPS, Medium represents the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance at this resolution. The High preset drops to 51 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS, both below the playable threshold.

For 2560x1440, the system can handle the Ultra preset while staying comfortably above 60 FPS, with an average of 72 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and demonstrates that the combination has significant headroom at this resolution. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable here, with averages ranging from 148 FPS on Low down to 72 FPS on Ultra.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, yielding an average of 112 FPS. This is the most demanding setting and still leaves substantial performance to spare, with the Low preset reaching 229 FPS and Medium at 175 FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the system is not constrained by the GPU, and even the highest quality settings produce frame rates well beyond the 60 FPS threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12600KF sits very close to several other processors in aggregate benchmark scores. The Intel Core i9-10900K is essentially a statistical tie, scoring only 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is also within 0.3% of the i5-12600KF’s average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U round out the group, with the former being 0.3% slower and the latter 0.3% faster. For gaming workloads in Minimum, these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance, meaning users with any of these chips would see very similar frame rates when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which is 0.7% faster in aggregate benchmarks, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which is 1% slower. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M trails by 1.1%, while the NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% ahead. These deltas are small enough that in real-world gaming, the differences would be negligible; swapping the RTX 3070 for any of these would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, though the older cards may lack modern feature support.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured results show a clear hierarchy across settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 79 FPS, with no min or max data recorded. Medium steps down to 61 FPS average, with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 70, indicating some frame time variance but still averaging above the playable threshold. High drops to 51 FPS average, and Ultra falls further to 39 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial—a 40 FPS difference—highlighting how demanding the higher presets are at 4K.

2560x1440 shows much stronger performance. Low produces 148 FPS average, Medium hits 113 FPS with a range of 96 to 130, High reaches 95 FPS, and Ultra still manages 72 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 76 FPS drop, but every setting remains above 60 FPS. The Medium preset’s min of 96 FPS suggests that even during intense scenes, the system never approaches the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system is clearly GPU-limited at the highest settings but still performs admirably. Low averages 229 FPS, Medium has a minimum of 149 and maximum of 201 with an average of 175, High reaches 147 FPS, and Ultra maintains 112 FPS. The Medium preset’s min of 149 FPS is higher than most other systems’ average at this resolution, demonstrating the headroom available.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The most demanding playable preset at this resolution is Medium, which averages 61 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 72 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and is the recommended choice for this resolution, as all four presets exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rival, the RX 7600 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score that is 0.7% higher than the RTX 3070. In practical terms, this difference is minimal, and both cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum.

Q: Is the i5-12600KF a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck at 1920x1080. The system achieves 112 FPS on Ultra settings and 229 FPS on Low, suggesting the GPU is the primary limiter only at the highest settings. The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded across all tests?

A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded is 52 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. This is below the 60 FPS threshold, but the average for that preset is 61 FPS, so it remains playable overall.

Q: How does this combination rank among all tested systems?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF and RTX 3070 combination ranks 1589 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the upper half of all systems tested for Minimum.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU share the workload in Minimum. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 229 FPS. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the GPU is not fully utilized, and the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to feed the graphics card. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 117 FPS, indicating that as settings increase, the GPU becomes more involved.

At 2560x1440, the system still shows strong performance, but the scaling from Low to Ultra narrows to a 76 FPS difference. This indicates that the GPU is starting to become the limiting factor, though the CPU continues to provide enough throughput to maintain high frame rates. The fact that Ultra still averages 72 FPS suggests a balanced workload between the two components.

The situation changes at 3840x2160, where the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. The difference between Low and Ultra is only 40 FPS, and even the Low preset’s 79 FPS is lower than the 148 FPS seen at 1440p. This steep drop from 1440p to 4K—about 47% fewer frames at Low settings—confirms that the RTX 3070’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary limits at this resolution. The CPU’s role diminishes significantly, as even a faster processor would not meaningfully improve 4K performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global ranking of tested combinations, this pairing sits at position 1589 out of 3712, which places it in the 57th percentile of all systems. This is a solid position for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU from the previous generation. The ranking reflects that while the RTX 3070 is a capable card—ranking in the 61st percentile among all GPUs—the i5-12600KF’s 79th percentile standing helps boost the overall combo’s performance. Systems ranked higher likely feature newer GPUs or more powerful CPUs, but for Minimum, this combination delivers frame rates that are competitive with many more expensive builds.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Minimum at all tested resolutions and presets, with the single exception of 4K Ultra. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 112 FPS average and Low reaching 229 FPS. This makes the system ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, including Ultra at 72 FPS, making it a strong choice for 1440p gaming with maximum quality. At 3840x2160, the system maintains playability on Low (79 FPS) and Medium (61 FPS), but High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) fall short of the 60 FPS threshold. For 4K gaming, users should stick with Medium settings or lower to ensure a smooth experience. Overall, the combination offers excellent performance for the vast majority of gaming scenarios, with only the most demanding 4K settings requiring compromise.