Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
155 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
79 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
100 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
9.8ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 37 44 56
1440p QHD 48 63 79 100
1080p Full HD 79 102 119 155

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 102
1920x1080 Low 155
1920x1080 Medium 119
1920x1080 Ultra 79
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Low 100
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 delivers a playable experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. The data shows a clear scaling pattern where the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance keeps frame rates high at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the combination reaches 155.3 FPS on Low settings and 78.7 FPS on Ultra, indicating substantial headroom for high-refresh displays. At 1440p, the best playable preset is High with 63 FPS, while 4K remains out of reach, with even Low settings averaging only 56.2 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded measurements identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 78.7 FPS, which is the highest visual quality that still clears the playable threshold. This is a notable achievement, as Ultra typically imposes the heaviest load on both the CPU and GPU, and the data confirms that this combination has sufficient resources for maximum settings at the most common resolution.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best option that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 63 FPS. The Medium preset also qualifies at 79.1 FPS, but High offers superior visual fidelity while remaining within the playable range. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 48.1 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target, so it is not recommended for a smooth experience.

For 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average recorded is 56.2 FPS on Low settings, which is below the playable threshold. High settings drop to 37.1 FPS, Medium to 44 FPS, and Ultra to 28.5 FPS. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this hardware requires a reduction in resolution or a hardware upgrade, as even the lowest settings cannot reach the target frame rate.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12600KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 becomes evident when examining the frame rate scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the CPU's capabilities are the primary driver, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly. The jump from Low (155.3 FPS) to Ultra (78.7 FPS) shows a 49% reduction in frame rate, which reflects the increased graphical workload, but the absolute numbers remain high, suggesting the CPU is not bottlenecking the system.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert its influence. The Low setting produces 99.7 FPS, while Ultra falls to 48.1 FPS, a 52% drop. Comparing the same preset across resolutions, High at 1080p (101.5 FPS) versus High at 1440p (63 FPS) shows a 38% decrease, which is directly attributable to the higher pixel count demanding more from the RTX 2060's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus. The GPU's 6.451 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for 1440p High, but not for Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The frame rates across all settings are compressed into a narrow range: Low at 56.2 FPS, Medium at 44 FPS, High at 37.1 FPS, and Ultra at 28.5 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU is saturated, and the CPU's performance is no longer relevant. The 10-core, 16-thread i5-12600KF with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz has more than enough computational power for this game, but the RTX 2060 cannot keep pace with the 8.3 million pixels at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database's nearest rival comparisons for the CPU place the Intel Core i5-12600KF in close company with several other processors. The i9-10900K scores 27872 with a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i5-12600KF performs nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D also sits at 27896 with a -0.3% delta, while the Ryzen 7 6800U at 27887 shows a -0.3% delta, and the Ryzen 5 8500GE at 27712 has a +0.3% delta. These results confirm that the i5-12600KF's 23391 Cinebench R23 multi-core score places it in a performance tier where any of these alternatives would yield similar frame rates in Minimum, assuming the GPU remains the same.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060's nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283 with a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270 with a +0.1% delta, the RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199 with a +0.6% delta, and the Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171 with a +0.8% delta. The differences are minimal, meaning a system using any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS numbers in the same CPU and game combination. The RTX 2060's percentile rank of 58 against all GPUs and its Passmark G3D score of 14111 indicate it is a mid-range card, and the rival data suggests that upgrading to any of these alternatives would not meaningfully change the playable settings at each resolution.

The Verdict

The recorded data answers the question of whether this PC can run Minimum with a clear yes, but with important caveats based on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four tested presets: Low (155.3 FPS), Medium (118.5 FPS), High (101.5 FPS), and Ultra (78.7 FPS). This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for this combination, with Ultra settings providing a fully playable experience.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High (63 FPS), Medium (79.1 FPS), and Low (99.7 FPS), but Ultra drops to 48.1 FPS, which is below the threshold. The best visual quality that maintains 60 FPS is High, and the data confirms that this preset is the recommended choice for 1440p gaming.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS on any setting. The best result is Low at 56.2 FPS, which is close but still short of the target. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: 4K is not playable with this hardware. For a smooth experience, users should stick to 1080p Ultra or 1440p High.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra settings achieve an average of 78.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Can this combination handle 2560x1440 at Ultra settings?

A: No, Ultra at 1440p averages 48.1 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. High settings average 63 FPS and are the best playable option.

Q: Is 3840x2160 playable with the RTX 2060?

A: No, even Low settings at 4K only reach 56.2 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target. No preset at this resolution is playable.

Q: How does the i5-12600KF compare to the Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The two CPUs are nearly identical, with the i5-12600KF scoring within -0.3% of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's average benchmark score.

Q: What GPU is closest in performance to the RTX 2060?

A: The GeForce GTX 580 has a 0% delta, meaning it performs almost exactly the same in the database's average benchmark score.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: Low settings average 99.7 FPS, while Ultra averages 48.1 FPS, a difference of 51.6 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 at position 2851 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the lower half of the field, which aligns with the measured FPS data showing that 4K is not playable. The rank reflects the overall capability of the system across all resolutions and settings, and while the CPU is in the 79th percentile for all processors, the GPU's 58th percentile position drags the combo down. The 10-core, 16-thread CPU with a 79th percentile ranking is a strong pairing, but the GPU's end-of-life production status and mid-range performance limit the system's overall ranking.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table summarizes the exact average frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination. Minimum and maximum FPS values were not recorded in the database, so only averages are available.

At 1920x1080, the measurements are:

  • Low: 155.3 FPS
  • Medium: 118.5 FPS
  • High: 101.5 FPS
  • Ultra: 78.7 FPS

At 2560x1440, the measurements are:

  • Low: 99.7 FPS
  • Medium: 79.1 FPS
  • High: 63 FPS
  • Ultra: 48.1 FPS

At 3840x2160, the measurements are:

  • Low: 56.2 FPS
  • Medium: 44 FPS
  • High: 37.1 FPS
  • Ultra: 28.5 FPS

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of roughly 37% across all settings, while the jump to 4K produces an additional 43% reduction, confirming the GPU as the dominant constraint at higher resolutions. The data indicates that the i5-12600KF's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 4.90 GHz boost clock are sufficient to feed the RTX 2060 at 1080p, but the GPU's 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus become limiting factors as pixel count rises. For users seeking a consistent 60 FPS experience, the optimal configuration is 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, with no viable option at 4K.