Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

65%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
179 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
88 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
56 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
62 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
8.7ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 40 48 62
1440p QHD 56 74 88 115
1080p Full HD 88 115 137 179

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 115
1920x1080 Low 179
1920x1080 Medium 137
1920x1080 Ultra 88
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Low 115
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 Ultra 56
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 62
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a combination built for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance. In the 2014 third-person shooter Minimum, this combo delivers playable frame rates across most settings, with the data showing a clear performance ceiling at 4K where only Low settings maintain the 60 FPS target. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares nearby hardware alternatives, and provides concrete settings guidance based on the benchmark data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for this PC in Minimum?*

A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 88 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 74 FPS on average, while at 3840x2160, only the Low preset reaches 62 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, which is only 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also just 0.3% above the i5-12600KF, indicating near-identical synthetic performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and how does it stack against similar cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17083. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, scores 17208, which is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, only 0.3% lower, showing that the RX 7600 XT sits in a competitive mid-range tier.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, but with significant limitations. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 62 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. However, Medium drops to 48 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS, making Low the only viable 4K option.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 115. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average drops to 74 FPS. This represents a 36% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 1440p, indicating the GPU becomes more stressed at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations in this game?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination ranks 2343rd out of 3712 total tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, suggesting that while it handles the game well at 1080p and 1440p, many other hardware pairings deliver higher frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12600KF’s average benchmark score of 27799 places it within a tight cluster of rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, just 0.3% higher, making it a near-identical performer in synthetic tests. The Intel Core i9-10900K also sits close with a score of 27872, a mere 0.3% above the i5-12600KF. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, a mobile chip, scores 27887, again just 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, a 0.3% deficit. In practice, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU, as the game’s CPU demands are modest for a 2014 title.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s average score of 17083 is closely matched by several rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, which is 0.7% higher, representing the closest performance gap. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, just 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a 0.4% deficit. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, which is 0.9% lower. Users transitioning from any of these GPUs would see similar frame rates in Minimum, though the RX 7600 XT’s 16 GB memory buffer provides more headroom for texture-heavy scenarios, a factor not reflected in the average benchmark scores.

For a system builder considering alternatives, swapping the i5-12600KF for an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D would yield virtually identical CPU-bound performance. Similarly, replacing the RX 7600 XT with an RTX 3070 would provide only a marginal uplift of 0.7% in GPU compute. The data suggests that this combo’s performance profile is well represented by these rivals, and users should not expect meaningful differences in Minimum when choosing among them.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary constraint, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra. At Low settings, the average FPS is 179, dropping to 137 at Medium, 115 at High, and 88 at Ultra. This steep decline indicates that the RX 7600 XT is fully utilized, while the i5-12600KF has ample headroom to feed frames.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU load increases further. Low settings yield 115 FPS, Medium drops to 88 FPS, High to 74 FPS, and Ultra to 56 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows compared to 1080p, suggesting the GPU is becoming the limiting factor more uniformly. At this resolution, the CPU’s role diminishes, as the i5-12600KF’s strong single-thread performance (scoring 3302 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is more than sufficient for Minimum’s 2014-era engine.

At 3840x2160, the GPU bottleneck becomes severe. Low settings average 62 FPS, Medium drops to 48 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS. The gap between presets widens again, but the absolute numbers are low across the board. The CPU’s influence is negligible here; the RX 7600 XT’s pixel throughput (176.3 GPixel/s) and memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) are simply inadequate for 4K at higher presets. The data shows that from 1080p to 1440p, the GPU becomes progressively more dominant, and at 4K, it is the sole determinant of playability.

Preset scaling reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces FPS by 51% (179 to 88), while at 1440p, the reduction is 51% (115 to 56). At 4K, the reduction is 52% (62 to 30), showing a consistent GPU-bound pattern. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, along with its 20 MB of shared L3 cache, never become a limiting factor in this game, as even the most demanding preset at 1080p leaves the i5-12600KF with significant idle capacity.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher across most resolution and preset combinations. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra averaging 88 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 74 FPS, Medium delivers 88 FPS, and Low delivers 115 FPS, all exceeding the playable mark. However, Ultra at 1440p drops to 56 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target, making it non-playable under the benchmark’s criteria.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive. Only the Low preset achieves 62 FPS, which narrowly clears the threshold. Medium averages 48 FPS, High 40 FPS, and Ultra 30 FPS, all below the 60 FPS standard. For 4K gaming, users must accept Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p offers full preset flexibility, 1440p offers most presets except Ultra, and 4K is limited to Low.

The measured FPS data includes minimum frame rates for Medium settings at each resolution: 116 FPS at 1080p, 75 FPS at 1440p, and 40 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate that even at Medium 4K, frame pacing suffers, reinforcing the recommendation to stick with Low at that resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination ranks 2343rd out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the system’s mid-range positioning—it outperforms many older or lower-tier pairings but lags behind high-end builds featuring flagship CPUs and GPUs. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking among all graphics cards contribute to this overall standing.

In practical terms, this rank means the combo sits in the lower half of the database, yet it still delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p. The 4K limitation at Low settings is consistent with the GPU’s mid-pack positioning. The data shows that while the i5-12600KF is a strong CPU capable of competing with top-tier chips from its generation, the RX 7600 XT anchors the system’s overall performance. Users seeking higher ranks would need a more powerful GPU, as the CPU is not the bottleneck in Minimum.

The rank of 2343 out of 3712 suggests that a significant number of tested combos achieve higher frame rates, likely due to more capable GPUs. However, for a 2014 game, this combo’s performance is more than adequate for most gaming scenarios, and the rank should be interpreted in the context of the game’s age and the hardware’s mid-range positioning.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 88 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. The measured minimum FPS for Medium at this resolution is 116, indicating that even lower presets offer substantial headroom.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 74 FPS. This exceeds the 60 FPS target by 23% and represents the best visual quality achievable at this resolution. Medium averages 88 FPS, which offers even more headroom, but High provides superior graphics without sacrificing playability. Ultra at 1440p falls short at 56 FPS, so it is not recommended.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 62 FPS. This is a marginal margin of just 3% above the playable standard, meaning frame rate fluctuations could occasionally dip below 60 FPS. Medium averages 48 FPS, High 40 FPS, and Ultra 30 FPS, all of which are unplayable under the benchmark’s criteria. For 4K, Low is the sole viable preset, and users should be prepared for a significant visual downgrade compared to lower resolutions.

The data shows that the optimal settings scale inversely with resolution: Ultra at 1080p, High at 1440p, and Low at 4K. This pattern reflects the GPU’s diminishing ability to handle higher pixel counts, and the i5-12600KF’s consistent performance across all resolutions confirms that the RX 7600 XT is the deciding factor in this configuration.