Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

55%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
170 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
83 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 18,093

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 45 59
1440p QHD 54 71 84 110
1080p Full HD 83 109 130 170

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 170
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 Ultra 83
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers playable performance in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The recorded data shows that the system can run the game smoothly at 1080p on Ultra settings with an average of 83 FPS, and at 1440p on High with 71 FPS. At 4K, even Low settings only reach 59 FPS, leaving no playable preset. This combo ranks 2602 out of 3712 tested configurations in the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database records average, minimum, and maximum frame rates for each resolution and preset combination. For entries where minimum or maximum values were not captured, only the average is listed.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 38 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 59 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45 | 38 | 52 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 71 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 110 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 84 | 71 | 97 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 109 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 170 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 130 | 111 | 150 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 83 | - | - |

At 3840x2160, none of the presets reach the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average is 59 FPS on Low, followed by 45 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 52), 38 FPS on High, and 29 FPS on Ultra. The system is clearly GPU-bound at this resolution, as even the lowest settings cannot lift the frame rate above the target.

At 2560x1440, three presets clear 60 FPS: High averages 71 FPS, Low averages 110 FPS, and Medium averages 84 FPS with a minimum of 71 and a maximum of 97. Ultra drops to 54 FPS, making it the only non-playable setting at this resolution. The gap between Ultra and High is substantial, indicating that the GPU's limits are reached when the most demanding preset is enabled.

At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable. High averages 109 FPS, Low averages 170 FPS, Medium averages 130 FPS (minimum 111, maximum 150), and Ultra averages 83 FPS. Even the most demanding setting stays comfortably above the 60 FPS line, giving the user full freedom to choose visual quality.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 4K, moving from Ultra to Low raises the average from 29 to 59 FPS, but the system still cannot reach 60 FPS. At 1440p, the same pattern appears: Ultra yields 54 FPS, while High and Medium deliver 71 and 84 FPS respectively. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to allow the GPU to push all settings above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 83 FPS.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 19039, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU scores 18093 and sits in the 62nd percentile. This suggests the processor is relatively stronger, which aligns with the observation that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. The CPU launched with an MSRP of $174, and the GPU with an MSRP of 399 USD.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is steep. On Low settings, the average FPS drops from 170 at 1080p to 110 at 1440p and 59 at 4K, a decline of 60 FPS and then 51 FPS respectively. This pattern is consistent across all presets and confirms that the rendering load, not the CPU, dictates performance at higher pixel counts. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough to maintain high frame rates, but once the resolution increases, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the constraining factor.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K?

A: No. The best average at 4K is 59 FPS on Low settings, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra averages 29 FPS, High 38 FPS, and Medium 45 FPS.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?

A: High, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium and Low also exceed 60 FPS, but High is the most demanding preset that stays above the line.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p Ultra?

A: 83 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates at 1080p Medium?

A: The average is 130 FPS, with a minimum of 111 and a maximum of 150.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Minimum?

A: It ranks 2602 out of 3712 combinations, placing it in the lower half of the database.

Q: Which component is more likely to limit performance at 1440p?

A: The GPU, since lowering the preset from Ultra to High raises the average from 54 to 71 FPS, while the CPU sits at the 73rd percentile versus the GPU's 62nd.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (average score 19047, 0% difference), Intel Core 3 201E (19056, -0.1%), Intel Core i5-1335U (18982, +0.3%), and AMD EPYC 7773X (18979, +0.3%). These processors have nearly identical benchmark scores, so they would deliver similar frame rates in Minimum. The small delta percentages, ranging from -0.1% to +0.3%, mean that swapping the i5-12400F for any of these would produce essentially the same gameplay experience.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, -0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, -0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373, -1.5%), and Intel Arc A770M (18383, -1.6%). All of these GPUs are within 1.6% of the RTX 2060 SUPER's average score, so they would behave similarly in this game. Users with any of these graphics cards can expect the same resolution and preset limitations as the RTX 2060 SUPER.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no setting reaches 60 FPS, so there is no playable preset. At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 71 FPS. Low and Medium also qualify, but High offers the best visual quality while maintaining smooth performance. At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best playable preset, averaging 83 FPS, with all other presets also above 60. This gives the user full flexibility to choose the highest quality settings at 1080p.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows that this system can run Minimum at 1080p and 1440p with settings that exceed 60 FPS. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 83 FPS. At 1440p, High delivers 71 FPS. At 4K, the system fails to reach 60 FPS on any preset, with the closest being Low at 59 FPS. Therefore, the answer is yes for 1080p and 1440p, but no for 4K. The combination of an Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a capable pairing for this game, provided the user sticks to resolutions at or below 2560x1440 and avoids the Ultra preset at that resolution.