Minimum

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a performance profile that is notably defined by its extremes in the benchmark database. The CPU sits in the 73rd percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU holds a more modest 51st percentile ranking, a discrepancy that suggests the graphics card is the primary constraint in this pairing. This dynamic is clearly reflected in the measured frame rates for Minimum, where the combination produces results ranging from a highly playable 251.8 FPS at 1080p Low settings down to a demanding 39.3 FPS at 4K Ultra, indicating that the system’s capability scales dramatically with resolution and graphical fidelity.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearestRivals data provides a clear picture of which other hardware would produce a comparable experience. For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400F’s average benchmark score of 19039 is virtually identical to that of the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which scores 19047, a deltaPct of 0. This means that in synthetic tests, these two processors are functionally interchangeable for this game, with performance differences likely falling within run-to-run variance. The Intel Core 3 201E is also extremely close, posting an average score of 19056, which is a negligible -0.1% difference from the i5-12400F. On the other side, the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982, a 0.3% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18979, also a 0.3% delta. In practical terms, any of these four processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minimum, making them all viable alternatives if the i5-12400F were unavailable.

The GPU landscape is more stratified. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has an average benchmark score of 11627, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which scores 11680, a deltaPct of -0.5%. This indicates the RX 7800 XT is actually slightly slower than the GTX 1660 in these specific aggregate benchmarks, a surprising result given their generational gap. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M follows closely with a score of 11528 (0.9% delta), and the NVIDIA Tesla K20c scores 11479 (1.3% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is the only rival that the RX 7800 XT clearly outperforms, posting a score of 11842, which represents a -1.8% delta for the 6500 XT. For Minimum, a system with a GTX 1660 would likely deliver frame rates within a few percentage points of the RX 7800 XT, making it a relevant point of comparison for users considering an alternative build.

FAQ

*Q: Can the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution in Minimum?*

A: Yes, but only up to Medium settings. The data shows an average of 64.6 FPS at 4K Medium, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 4K High, the average drops to 55 FPS, which is below the target.

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that this combo can run at 1440p while staying above 60 FPS?

A: The system can run Minimum at 1440p Ultra settings, achieving an average of 78.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it still provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7800 XT compare to its nearest rival, the GTX 1660, in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 7800 XT’s average benchmark score is 11627, which is 0.5% lower than the GTX 1660’s score of 11680. Despite being a newer generation card, the aggregate benchmark data suggests they perform at a very similar level.

*Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the limiting factor for this system in Minimum?*

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 73rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU only ranks in the 51st percentile. Furthermore, the frame rates scale significantly with resolution and settings, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance.

Q: What is the best 4K setting for this hardware if the goal is to maximize visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS?

A: The best setting is Medium, as it delivers an average of 64.6 FPS. Choosing High would reduce the average to 55 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. Ultra at 4K is not viable, with an average of only 39.3 FPS.

Q: Does the system achieve a higher frame rate at 1080p Low or 1440p High?

A: The frame rate at 1080p Low is significantly higher, at 251.8 FPS, compared to 101.3 FPS at 1440p High. This illustrates the substantial performance cost of increasing resolution, even when stepping down in graphical detail.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS varies by resolution. At 3840x2160, the highest playable setting is Medium, which yields an average of 64.6 FPS. The High preset at this resolution falls short, averaging only 55 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 39.3 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the system can handle the Ultra preset, achieving an average of 78.8 FPS, which is the best visual setting available. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is also the best option, with an impressive average of 121.3 FPS. These results indicate that for users prioritizing visual fidelity, 1440p Ultra represents the sweet spot, while 4K users must compromise with Medium settings.

The Verdict

The benchmark data confirms that the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT can run Minimum, but the experience is heavily dependent on the chosen resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly capable, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at all tested presets, including Ultra with an average of 121.3 FPS. The same is true at 2560x1440, where even the Ultra preset maintains a comfortable average of 78.8 FPS. The situation changes at 3840x2160, where the system becomes more constrained. At 4K, only the Low and Medium presets are playable, with averages of 85 FPS and 64.6 FPS respectively. The High preset dips to 55 FPS, and Ultra drops to 39.3 FPS, both falling below the playable threshold. Therefore, the answer is a qualified yes: this PC can run the game well at 1080p and 1440p at maximum settings, but at 4K, users will need to reduce the preset to Medium to maintain a fluid experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates provide a complete picture of the system’s performance. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are as follows: 251.8 FPS on Low, 188.5 FPS on Medium, 163.9 FPS on High, and 121.3 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, the averages are 161.6 FPS on Low, 123.8 FPS on Medium, 101.3 FPS on High, and 78.8 FPS on Ultra. The most demanding resolution, 3840x2160, shows a significant drop: 85 FPS on Low, 64.6 FPS on Medium, 55 FPS on High, and 39.3 FPS on Ultra. No minimum or maximum frame rate data was provided, so the analysis relies on average FPS. The consistent pattern across all resolutions shows a clear performance hierarchy, with Low settings offering the highest frame rates and Ultra the lowest, as expected.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT holds a rank of 1300 out of 3712 total combinations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of tested systems, indicating that it outperforms a majority of other configurations. The rank of 1300, while not at the top, demonstrates that this is a capable setup for the game. The fact that it is out of the top 1000 suggests that there are many more powerful combinations, but the 1080p and 1440p results show that it is more than sufficient for a smooth gaming experience in Minimum at those resolutions. The 4K performance, while limited, is still playable at medium settings, which reflects the balance of this hardware pairing.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Minimum. The CPU’s high percentile rank (73rd) and strong multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380, suggest it is unlikely to be a bottleneck in this game. The GPU’s lower percentile rank (51st) and the frame rate scaling patterns point to it as the primary performance limiter. When the resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the frame rates at Ultra settings drop dramatically from 121.3 FPS to 39.3 FPS, a reduction of over 67%. This sharp decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card struggles to fill the additional pixels. Conversely, the CPU’s workload changes less with resolution, as the game’s logic and draw calls remain relatively constant. The scaling between settings at the same resolution further supports this. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the frame rate from 251.8 FPS to 121.3 FPS, a significant drop that is again indicative of GPU load. The CPU is clearly capable of feeding the GPU at all tested settings, as even at 1080p Low, the frame rate exceeds 250 FPS, which would require a strong processor to sustain. In summary, for Minimum, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the determining factor for performance at higher resolutions and settings, while the Intel Core i5-12400F provides ample headroom to ensure the GPU is the primary constraint.