Minimum

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a formidable combination for Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014. Benchmark data places this specific pairing at rank 1171 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it comfortably in the top third of all systems evaluated. This is a configuration that consistently delivers high frame rates, though the most demanding settings at 4K resolution will push it to its limits. The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at standard resolutions, with enough headroom for demanding visual presets.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3712 tested CPU and GPU combinations, this pairing ranks 1171st for Minimum. This places it in the upper portion of the performance distribution, indicating that it is a strong contender for playing this title. The rank reflects the combined capability of the Intel Core i5-12400F and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, which together provide a substantial amount of processing power for both the game's logic and its rendering demands.

The CPU itself holds the 73rd percentile against all tested CPUs, underscoring its strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. Its average benchmark score of 19039 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which scores 19047, a 0% difference. The i5-12400F also edges out the Intel Core 3 201E by 0.1% and the Intel Core i5-1335U by 0.3%, while being 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7773X. This suggests that the processor's performance is a known quantity, sitting at a performance plateau shared by several other modern CPUs.

On the graphics side, the RX 6800 XT performs even more strongly. It sits in the 85th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48477. This places it notably ahead of its nearest listed rival, the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, which scores 47743, meaning the RX 6800 XT is 1.5% faster. It also outperforms the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 3%, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 3%. This GPU is a significant performance driver in this combo, and its high percentile ranking is a key reason the overall system sits where it does in the rankings.

Best Settings per Resolution

For a smooth 60 FPS experience, the data provides clear guidance on the best settings for each resolution. The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS varies with resolution.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system is most constrained. The High preset averages 57 FPS, which falls just short of the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset is the most demanding option that clears the threshold, achieving an average of 66.3 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K play, as it provides a comfortable margin above the playable threshold while still offering improved fidelity over Low.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system has ample headroom. Every preset, from Low to Ultra, averages above 60 FPS. The best-looking option that remains playable is the Ultra preset, which delivers an average of 83.4 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality at 1440p with performance to spare.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the experience is exceptional. All presets achieve very high frame rates. The Ultra preset is again the best choice, delivering an average of 125.6 FPS. This makes the pairing ideal for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, as it can push well beyond the standard 60 FPS target even at the highest settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The balance of responsibility between the CPU and GPU shifts as resolution and settings change. The data shows how the workload scales across the different configurations.

At 1080p, the game becomes increasingly CPU-bound at lower settings. The jump from High (166.4 FPS) to Low (258.5 FPS) is massive, representing a 92.1 FPS increase. This indicates that at Low settings, the GPU is rendering frames so quickly that the CPU's ability to issue draw calls and process game logic becomes the limiting factor. The RX 6800 XT is powerful enough to render the scene in well under 4 milliseconds at these settings, so the i5-12400F's performance is what caps the frame rate.

As the resolution increases to 1440p, the balance shifts. The GPU has to work harder to fill more pixels, which reduces the frame rate ceiling. The difference between Low (169 FPS) and Ultra (83.4 FPS) is still substantial, but the overall frame rates are lower. The GPU is becoming a more significant factor, though the CPU still has a role to play in maintaining high frame rates.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The Low preset averages 91.2 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 46.8 FPS. This significant drop is almost entirely due to the increased pixel fill rate demand on the RX 6800 XT. The CPU is no longer the bottleneck, as even the most demanding GPU workload at 4K Low is not enough to saturate the i5-12400F's processing capabilities. The scaling between Low and Ultra at 4K shows a 44.4 FPS difference, highlighting the GPU's heavy lifting.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For builders considering this combination, the nearest rivals for each component provide a sense of what other hardware would behave similarly in this game.

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a performance twin of the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, with a benchmark score difference of only 8 points (19039 vs 19047), showing a 0% delta. Other close alternatives include the Intel Core 3 201E, which is 0.1% slower, and the Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X, which are both 0.3% faster. These processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU, so choosing between them would likely come down to platform features or pricing rather than gaming performance.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile. The Intel Arc A550M is 2.5% slower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 are 3% slower. These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in this game, with the RX 6800 XT holding a slight edge. A system with any of these alternative GPUs paired with the i5-12400F would land in the same general performance tier, though the small deltas could affect whether a specific setting at 4K stays above the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average frame rates measured for this combination across all tested resolutions and settings.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ |

| 3840x2160 | High | 57.0 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 91.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46.8 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 105.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 169.0 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 127.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 83.4 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 166.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 258.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 200.0 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 125.6 |

The data shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern. At each resolution, the frame rate decreases as visual fidelity increases, with the largest single drop occurring between Low and Medium settings at 1080p, a 58.5 FPS difference. At 4K, the gap between Medium and High is 9.3 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 10.2 FPS, showing that the GPU is increasingly taxed at higher settings.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Minimum, and it does so with exceptional performance at all but the most extreme settings.

At 1920x1080, the system is a powerhouse. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the Ultra preset providing an average of 125.6 FPS. This is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold and is suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent. Again, all presets are playable, and the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 83.4 FPS. This gives you a high level of visual detail with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the system is still capable, but you must be selective with settings. The Medium preset is the best-looking option that maintains an average above 60 FPS, hitting 66.3 FPS. The High preset dips to 57 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. For 4K gaming, you will need to stick to Medium or Low to ensure a smooth experience.

The verdict is clear: this is a very capable gaming system for Minimum. The only compromise is at 4K resolution, where the highest settings will require a reduction to Medium to maintain a consistent 60 FPS. For 1080p and 1440p gamers, this combination offers an outstanding experience with no performance compromises.