Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
215 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
106 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
70 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 26,011

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 46 59 77
1440p QHD 70 88 108 136
1080p Full HD 106 135 162 215

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 135
1920x1080 Low 215
1920x1080 Medium 162
1920x1080 Ultra 106
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 108
2560x1440 Ultra 70
3840x2160 High 46
3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a capable combination for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. Benchmark data indicates that this setup delivers smooth gameplay across the most common resolutions, with the primary limitation appearing only at 4K with higher presets. The CPU's six Performance cores and 12 threads, clocked up to 4.40 GHz, provide a solid foundation, while the GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle the game's rendering demands effectively.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy of playable settings for each resolution, based on a 60 FPS playable threshold.

  • 1920x1080 (1080p): The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 106.4 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the hardware has ample headroom, as even the demanding Ultra preset is well above the playable threshold. Lower presets like High (135.3 FPS), Medium (161.7 FPS), and Low (214.9 FPS) all exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra is the optimal choice for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
  • 2560x1440 (1440p): The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 69.6 FPS. This is a significant result, as it means the combo can run the game at maximum settings on a 1440p monitor. The data shows a clear progression from High (87.9 FPS) to Medium (108.1 FPS) to Low (136.3 FPS), but Ultra remains the best pick for those prioritizing image quality, as it is the only preset that offers the full visual experience while still clearing the 60 FPS bar.
  • 3840x2160 (4K): The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which achieves an average of 77 FPS. This is the only playable preset at this resolution. The High preset falls below the threshold at 46.4 FPS, and Medium (58.7 FPS) also misses the 60 FPS target. Ultra is not viable, with an average of 33.8 FPS. For 4K, users must compromise on visual quality to achieve smooth gameplay.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with high settings?*

A: No. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the High preset averages 46.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable setting at 4K is Low, which averages 77 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The best preset is Ultra, which averages 69.6 FPS. This is the highest quality option that maintains an average above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the ideal choice for a balance of visual fidelity and performance.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 214.9 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 106.4 FPS. This represents a performance increase of roughly 108.5 FPS, or over double the frame rate, for users who prefer maximum responsiveness over visual detail.

Q: Is the RX 6750 XT a bottleneck for the Core i5-12400F in this game?

A: The data suggests the pairing is well-balanced. The combo ranks 1716 out of 3712 tested combinations. Benchmark results indicate that the GPU's performance, at the 71st percentile of all GPUs, aligns well with the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking, suggesting neither component severely limits the other in this title.

Q: What frame rate can I expect with Medium settings at 1080p?

A: The measured average FPS for Medium settings at 1920x1080 is 161.7 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a very smooth experience with a good balance between quality and speed.

Q: Does the game support the latest graphics APIs with this hardware?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern rendering techniques, though Minimum's 2014 release date means it may not fully utilize these features.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the benchmark data, several other CPUs and GPUs offer performance very close to this combo, which can be useful for comparison or potential substitutions.

  • CPU Rivals: The Intel Core i5-12400F's average benchmark score is 19039. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 and a delta of 0%, indicating virtually identical performance. The Intel Core 3 201E is also a close match with a score of 19056 and a delta of -0.1%, meaning it is marginally slower. The Intel Core i5-1335U (score 18982, delta 0.3%) and AMD EPYC 7773X (score 18979, delta 0.3%) are also within a negligible performance range. In gaming, these differences would be imperceptible.
  • GPU Rivals: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (score 25891, delta 0.5%), the AMD FirePro W7100 (score 25856, delta 0.6%), and the AMD FirePro D700 (score 25842, delta 0.7%). These are all within 1% of the RX 6750 XT's performance. Notably, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (score 25740, delta 1.1%) is also a close rival, suggesting that a high-end mobile GPU can match this desktop card's performance in this context.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Minimum effectively, but the experience varies significantly by resolution.

For 1920x1080, the verdict is an unqualified yes. The system achieves an average of 106.4 FPS at Ultra settings, which is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, providing a high-quality, high-frame-rate experience.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is also positive. The system runs Ultra settings at an average of 69.6 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS bar. This makes 1440p a very viable option for gamers who own a QHD monitor, offering a substantial upgrade in visual clarity over 1080p while maintaining smooth performance.

For 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. The system can run the game, but only at Low settings, which average 77 FPS. The High and Medium presets both fall below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra is not playable. This resolution is only recommended if the user is willing to significantly reduce visual quality for the sake of resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measured for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106.4 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 135.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 161.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 214.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 69.6 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 87.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 108.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 136.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.8 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 46.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 77.0 |

The data shows a predictable scaling of performance across resolutions and settings. The jump from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 30-40%, while the jump to 4K is even more demanding. Notably, at 4K, the performance drop from Low to Medium is only 19.6 FPS (from 77 to 58.7), but the drop from Medium to High is 12.3 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 12.6 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding. At 1440p and 1080p, the scaling is more linear, with each step up in settings costing a proportional amount of performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT holds a rank of 1716 out of 3712 total combos. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, indicating that it is a solid performer for this game. The percentile ranking of the CPU (73rd percentile of all CPUs) and GPU (71st percentile of all GPUs) are closely aligned, which supports the conclusion that this is a well-matched pairing. While it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, its rank suggests that it will deliver a consistently playable experience at high settings for the majority of users, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The data confirms that this combo is a dependable choice for running Minimum smoothly, with the only significant caveat being the inability to use high visual presets at 4K resolution.