Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 76 | 87 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 105 | 136 | 160 | 214 |
| 1080p Full HD | 162 | 213 | 251 | 329 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a formidable combination for Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014. This pairing ranks 437th out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 12% of all systems evaluated for this title. With the playable threshold set at 60 FPS, the data shows this system clears that bar at every resolution and preset tested, with only one notable exception at 4K Ultra settings. This is a system that delivers high refresh-rate performance at 1080p and 1440p, while still maintaining smooth gameplay at 4K with adjusted settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 437 out of 3712 combos indicates it is solidly in the upper tier of systems for Minimum. This is not a top-100 contender, but it sits comfortably ahead of the vast majority of configurations. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU's strong single-threaded performance and the GPU's immense rasterization power. The i5-12400's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2257 and multi-core score of 15989 show a capable processor that can feed the GPU effectively. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's Passmark G3D score of 31811, which places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, is the primary driver of this high ranking. The data implies that this combo is built for high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions, and its rank confirms that it delivers on that promise. The gap between this combo and the very top of the leaderboard is likely due to CPUs with higher multi-threaded scores, but for a game like Minimum, the single-thread performance and GPU muscle are what matter most.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily GPU-bound, but the CPU's headroom is still crucial for achieving the highest frame rates. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p shows a drop from 329 FPS to 162.1 FPS, a 50.7% reduction. This massive scaling is almost entirely due to the GPU's workload increasing with graphical fidelity. However, the fact that the system can push 329 FPS at Low settings indicates the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution. The i5-12400's 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and 2-thread score of 1692 provide the necessary instruction throughput to sustain such high frame rates.
As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more dominant. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings shows a drop from 162.1 FPS to 105.2 FPS, a 35.1% decrease. This is a significant drop, but it still leaves the game highly playable. At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 drops to 55.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. This indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 672.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth are simply not enough to maintain 60 FPS at 4K with the most demanding settings. The CPU's influence at 4K is minimal, as the workload is dominated by pixel pushing, a task that falls entirely on the GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers outstanding performance across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 329 FPS, which is extraordinarily high and ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset drops to 250.5 FPS, still well above any high-refresh-rate display's capability. High settings yield 213.2 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains an impressive 162.1 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system has significant headroom at 1080p, and users can crank every setting to maximum without worrying about frame rate drops.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains excellent. The Low preset averages 214.1 FPS, a minor reduction from 1080p but still astronomically high. Medium settings produce 159.6 FPS, while High settings deliver 136.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p achieves 105.2 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a perfect balance between visual fidelity and frame rate. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with an average drop of roughly 35-40% across presets, which is expected given the increase in pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. The Low preset still performs admirably, averaging 115.4 FPS. Medium settings produce 86.9 FPS, and High settings achieve 75.5 FPS. All three of these presets are playable at 4K. However, the Ultra preset drops to 55.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to reach 60 FPS. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is too demanding for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, but 4K High is a viable option for users who prefer resolution over maximum settings.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with the highest settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 55.8, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which achieves an average of 75.5 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maximize frame rate?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset delivers 162.1 FPS, making it the highest frame rate at the highest settings. For a balance between visual quality and performance, 2560x1440 at Ultra provides 105.2 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The scaling from Low to Ultra presets shows a 50.7% drop in FPS, from 329 to 162.1, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark is sufficient to keep up.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in this game?
A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, scores 31206, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676, which is 1.9% higher. These differences are minimal and would not result in a perceptible FPS difference in Minimum.
Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?
A: Based on the data, no. The CPU's average benchmark score of 18683 is only 0.9% lower than the Intel Core i3-14100F, which is its nearest rival. The i5-12400's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2257 is strong, and the measured FPS at 1080p (329 FPS on Low) suggests the CPU is not holding back the GPU.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400's nearest rivals are incredibly close in performance. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18697, a mere 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519, which is 0.9% lower. These differences are within the margin of error and would result in virtually identical frame rates in Minimum. Users with any of these CPUs would experience the same level of performance, assuming the same GPU is used.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals are also remarkably close. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 scores 31206, just 0.4% higher, while the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, 1.4% higher, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676, 1.9% higher. These GPUs would deliver near-identical performance in Minimum. The TITAN RTX might offer a slight edge at 4K Ultra, potentially pushing it over the 60 FPS threshold, but the difference is marginal based on the data.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 162.1 FPS. This is the optimal choice for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, as it provides a massive frame rate buffer.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, delivering an average of 105.2 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a great balance between visual quality and performance. The system has enough headroom to maintain smooth gameplay even in intense firefights.
At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 75.5 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 55.8 FPS, so users at 4K should stick to High settings to ensure a consistent 60+ FPS experience. Medium settings at 4K also work, averaging 86.9 FPS, but High provides the best visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can absolutely run Minimum. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 162.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra achieving 105.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system can run Low, Medium, and High presets above 60 FPS, with High being the best playable option at 75.5 FPS. The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold is 4K with the Ultra preset, which averages 55.8 FPS. This is a minor caveat for a system that otherwise excels. The data shows this combo is a high-performance solution for Minimum, capable of delivering excellent frame rates at all mainstream resolutions. Users targeting 1080p or 1440p will have an exceptional experience, and even 4K gaming is viable with a modest reduction in settings.