Minimum

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER occupies the 2723rd position out of 3712 tested combinations for Minimum, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database’s ranking table. This percentile standing reflects a configuration that is far from the top of the charts, yet the recorded frame rates tell a more nuanced story than the raw rank suggests. The combo’s positioning is heavily influenced by the sheer diversity of hardware tested, which includes far more powerful modern components. However, when isolated to the actual gameplay metrics, this pairing demonstrates a clear capability to handle the title at mainstream resolutions with high visual quality, even if it falls short of the demands of 4K Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The database records this combination at rank 2723 out of 3712 total configurations, which translates to roughly the 73rd percentile of all tested systems. In practical terms, this means a substantial portion of tested rigs outperform it, but the rank itself does not indicate failure. The average benchmark scores for the individual components reinforce this middle-tier position: the CPU achieves an average score of 18683, while the GPU posts an average of 18093. These figures are closely matched, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

The CPU’s percentile versus all processors is 72, and the GPU’s percentile versus all graphics cards is 62. This slight discrepancy indicates the processor is relatively stronger in the broader market context than the graphics card. For Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014, the combination’s rank is more than adequate for the game’s age and engine demands. The data shows that while this setup will not compete with top-tier builds, it does not need to, as the measured frame rates at lower resolutions demonstrate performance that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the primary driver of performance scaling across resolutions, while the i5-12400 provides ample headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. At 1920x1080, the GPU delivers an average of 169.4 FPS on Low settings, 127.3 FPS on Medium, 106.6 FPS on High, and 81.6 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, these figures drop to 107 FPS on Low, 84.3 FPS on Medium, 68.9 FPS on High, and 56.1 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the averages fall further to 59.1 FPS on Low, 45.9 FPS on Medium, 37.3 FPS on High, and 29.9 FPS on Ultra.

The scaling pattern between 1080p and 1440p shows an average reduction of roughly 37% across all settings, which is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where the increased pixel count directly impacts the render load. The jump from 1440p to 4K produces an even steeper decline, with the Ultra preset dropping from 56.1 FPS to 29.9 FPS, a 47% loss. This indicates that at 4K, the graphics card is decisively the limiting factor. The CPU’s role remains largely static, as its 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz are sufficient to feed the GPU at all tested settings. The data does not show any resolution where the processor becomes the constraint, as the frame rate drops align almost perfectly with the GPU’s pixel throughput capabilities.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database’s nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-12400 include the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores an average of 18697, a negligible 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-1355U sits at 18730, 0.3% above, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 reaches 18811, 0.7% higher. On the lower side, the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519, which is 0.9% below the i5-12400. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame pacing in Minimum when paired with the same GPU.

For the graphics card, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159, a 0.4% difference, the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18189, a 0.5% difference, and the AMD Radeon RX 460 at 18373, a 1.5% difference. The Intel Arc A770M posts 18383, 1.6% higher. A system builder swapping the RTX 2060 SUPER for any of these alternatives would see virtually indistinguishable average frame rates in this title, as the performance gaps are well within measurement noise. The practical takeaway is that this configuration sits in a dense cluster of similarly performing hardware, and users with any of these components should expect comparable results.

The Verdict

The recorded data answers the core question directly: yes, this PC can run Minimum, but with important caveats tied to resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unambiguous. All four settings, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the best playable setting being Ultra at an average of 81.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system remains largely playable, with High, Low, and Medium all exceeding 60 FPS. The best setting at this resolution is High at 68.9 FPS, which provides a solid experience with room to spare.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes completely. The verdict lists no playable settings, meaning every preset fails to reach the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest recorded average at 4K is 59.1 FPS on Low, which is just shy of the mark. The data indicates that 4K gaming is not viable with this hardware combination for this title, at least not without significant compromises that still fall short. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, the configuration delivers a smooth experience, and the Ultra preset at 1080p offers the best combination of visual fidelity and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the lowest settings produce an average of 169.4 FPS, which is a very high refresh rate suitable for competitive play. Medium settings drop to 127.3 FPS, still far above the playability threshold. High settings yield 106.6 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 81.6 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a roughly 52% reduction in frame rate, a typical cost for the visual enhancements offered by the higher presets.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 107 FPS, Medium averages 84.3 FPS, High averages 68.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 56.1 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is 12.8 FPS, which is the largest single-step drop at this resolution. Users who wish to maintain a locked 60 FPS experience should stay at High or below. At 3840x2160, Low averages 59.1 FPS, Medium averages 45.9 FPS, High averages 37.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 29.9 FPS. None of these reach the 60 FPS threshold, and the Ultra preset at 4K delivers less than half the required frame rate. The data does not include minimum or maximum frame rate values, so the analysis relies solely on average performance, which still provides a clear picture of the system’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with the highest settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the system averages 81.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is the best playable option at 2560x1440, averaging 68.9 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below 60 FPS at 56.1 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this configuration?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average is 59.1 FPS on Low settings, which does not meet the 60 FPS playable threshold. No settings are listed as playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 scores 18683 on average. Its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 7643, scores 18697, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-1355U is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i3-14100F is 0.9% lower.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER scores 18093 on average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, 1.5% higher, and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, 1.6% higher.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p on Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with the Medium preset, the system averages 84.3 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.