Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

48%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
171 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
84 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
9.1ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 17,177
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 45 59
1440p QHD 54 71 84 110
1080p Full HD 84 110 131 171

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 110
1920x1080 Low 171
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 Ultra 84
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination in Minimum shows a clear performance gradient across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 171 FPS, while High settings drop to 110 FPS. Medium settings land at 131 FPS with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. Ultra settings still hold well above the playable threshold at 84 FPS average.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Low settings average 110 FPS, High settings average 71 FPS, and Medium settings average 84 FPS with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution fall to 54 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops more sharply. Low settings average 59 FPS, just shy of the playable mark. Medium settings average 45 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS. High settings average 38 FPS, and Ultra settings average 29 FPS. None of the 4K presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution unsuitable for smooth gameplay with this hardware.

The pattern across resolutions shows that the jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35-40% of average FPS at equivalent settings, while the jump from 1440p to 4K costs another 45-50%. This scaling is consistent with the GPU being the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU has less impact when pixel throughput dominates.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database, this specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 2549 out of 3712 tested combinations for Minimum. That places it in the lower third of all combos, which is consistent with the measured results: the system handles 1080p and 1440p well, but struggles at 4K. The rank reflects that while this combo can run the game smoothly at mainstream resolutions, it does not compete with higher-end pairings that can sustain 4K performance.

The percentile positioning for the individual components tells a similar story. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all tested processors, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of CPUs in the database. The GPU, however, sits at the 57th percentile among all tested graphics cards. This gap suggests that the graphics card is the limiting factor for demanding resolutions and presets, while the processor has more headroom.

The combo rank of 2549 out of 3712 indicates that many other pairings deliver better overall performance in this game. However, the rank also shows that this combo is not near the bottom either. It outperforms roughly 31% of tested combinations, which aligns with its ability to handle 1080p Ultra and 1440p High without issue.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F is closely matched by several other processors. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores within 0.3% of the i5-11400F, making it effectively identical in raw benchmark performance. The Intel Core i5-12450H is 0.4% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.6% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is 0.6% ahead. None of these differences are meaningful in real-world gaming, so any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has three close rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is within 0.2% of the RX 7600's average score, making it a direct alternative. The AMD Radeon 680M is 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X is 0.6% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 0.7% ahead. These deltas are small enough that users would not notice a difference in Minimum's frame rates. The RX 7600 and its nearest rivals all sit in the same performance band, so swapping between them would produce nearly identical results at every resolution and preset tested.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, this PC can run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160. At 1080p, every preset including Ultra clears the threshold, with Ultra averaging 84 FPS. At 1440p, High settings average 71 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS, and Low averages 110 FPS, all above the playable mark. Ultra at 1440p averages 54 FPS, which falls short.

At 4K, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings come closest at 59 FPS average, but that is still below the threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all average below 50 FPS. For users with a 4K display, the system would require either a resolution reduction or a significant settings compromise to reach playable frame rates. For 1080p and 1440p users, the verdict is clear: this combo delivers smooth performance across most settings, with only 1440p Ultra being marginal.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 84 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High settings provide the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS, with an average of 71 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 54 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: Does this combo work at 3840x2160?

A: No. The highest average FPS at 4K is 59 FPS on Low settings, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F is within 0.6% of its closest rivals in average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC 7H12 is 0.3% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-12450H is 0.4% behind. These differences are negligible for gaming.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is within 0.7% of its closest competitors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 0.2% behind, the AMD Radeon 680M is 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X is 0.6% ahead.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at Medium settings?

A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum FPS is 111. At 1440p Medium, it is 72. At 4K Medium, it is 39. These values represent the worst-case frame dips during the recorded session.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 84 FPS. This is the highest quality option available at this resolution that maintains smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is High, which averages 71 FPS. Medium also clears the threshold at 84 FPS, but High provides better visual fidelity while still staying above 60 FPS. Ultra at this resolution averages 54 FPS, so it is not recommended.

At 3840x2160, there is no preset that reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 59 FPS average, which is technically below the playable threshold. Users at this resolution should either lower the resolution or accept frame rates below 60 FPS, as none of the tested presets meet the standard.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combination delivers 171 FPS on Low settings and 84 FPS on Ultra, a drop of roughly 51%. This large gap between presets indicates that the GPU is already being exercised heavily even at 1080p, but the CPU has enough headroom to feed it effectively. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking supports this, as it is clearly not the bottleneck at this resolution.

At 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 35-38% compared to 1080p at equivalent settings. This scaling is typical of GPU-limited scenarios, where pixel count directly impacts rendering load. The CPU's role diminishes further, as the frame rate differences between Low and Ultra at 1440p (110 FPS vs 54 FPS) are driven almost entirely by GPU workload.

At 4K, the GPU is firmly the limiting factor. Low settings average 59 FPS, which is just below the threshold, while Ultra drops to 29 FPS. The CPU's contribution is minimal here, as even the lowest settings cannot push the GPU past the 60 FPS mark. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking among all graphics cards becomes the decisive factor at this resolution.

The scaling between resolutions and presets shows that the Intel Core i5-11400F provides ample processing power for Minimum at all tested resolutions, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 determines the ceiling. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, the CPU and GPU are well balanced. For 4K, only the GPU matters, and it does not have enough throughput to maintain 60 FPS at any preset.