Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
161 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
82 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
107 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 36 43 56
1440p QHD 51 68 78 107
1080p Full HD 82 106 123 161

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 161
1920x1080 Medium 123
1920x1080 Ultra 82
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 107
2560x1440 Medium 78
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a playable experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. Benchmark results show a clear performance ceiling at 3840x2160, where even the Low preset averages only 55.6 FPS. The data indicates this combination is best suited for 1440p High settings, where it achieves a 68 FPS average, or 1080p Ultra at 81.8 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a wide range of performance across the four presets. The Low preset averages 161.3 FPS, which is the highest score recorded for this configuration. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 122.8 FPS, still well above the playable threshold. The High preset averages 106.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 81.8 FPS. All four presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS mark, with the Ultra preset retaining a comfortable margin of 21.8 FPS over the threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably but remains playable on three of the four presets. The Low preset averages 107.3 FPS, which is the highest 1440p result. Medium follows with 78.3 FPS, and High averages 68 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 51.3 FPS. This makes High the most demanding playable preset at 1440p, with a 8 FPS cushion above the playability line.

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset averages 55.6 FPS, just 4.4 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 43.4 FPS, High averages 36.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 27.3 FPS. No preset at 4K reaches the playable threshold, and the gap widens significantly as settings increase. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 28.3 FPS, indicating a strong dependence on graphics settings at this resolution.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minimum?*

A: The highest average FPS is 161.3, recorded at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

*Q: Is this PC capable of running Minimum at 4K?*

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best result is 55.6 FPS on the Low preset, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Which preset at 1440p maintains at least 60 FPS?

A: The High, Medium, and Low presets all average above 60 FPS at 2560x1440. The High preset averages 68 FPS, Medium averages 78.3 FPS, and Low averages 107.3 FPS.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 81.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a playable experience.

Q: What is the performance gap between 1080p and 1440p on the High preset?

A: The High preset averages 106.2 FPS at 1080p and 68 FPS at 1440p, a difference of 38.2 FPS.

Q: Does the Ultra preset ever become playable?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080, where it averages 81.8 FPS. At 2560x1440 it averages 51.3 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it averages 27.3 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2834 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, meaning a majority of tested configurations outperform it in this specific game. The rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU is a top-tier part. Given the 68th percentile standing of the Arc B580 among all GPUs, the combo's ranking is consistent with a mid-range graphics card paired with a high-end processor.

The data shows that the combo's ranking is heavily influenced by resolution. At 1080p, the configuration performs strongly, with all presets exceeding 60 FPS. At 1440p, it remains competitive but drops out of the top tier at Ultra settings. At 4K, the combo falls below playable thresholds entirely, which likely contributes significantly to its overall rank of 2834. The 3712 total combos tested means this pairing sits in the 76th percentile of all configurations, a modest standing for a system with a 95th percentile CPU.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, AMD EPYC 8224P, and Intel Core Ultra 9 285. The Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 has an average benchmark score of 75738, a 0.1% delta from the 9950X3D's 75779. The Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75716, also a 0.1% delta. The EPYC 8224P scores 75582, a 0.3% delta, and the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, a 0.4% delta. These CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU, as the performance difference is within one percent.

For the Intel Arc B580, the closest GPU rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and NVIDIA P106-100. The RX 580 2048SP has an average score of 23061, a -0.2% delta from the B580's 23021. The RTX 2080 scores 22895, a 0.6% delta. The RTX 3080 scores 23172, a -0.7% delta, and the P106-100 scores 23249, a -1.0% delta. Substituting any of these GPUs for the B580 would produce similar measured FPS in Minimum, with the RTX 3080 being marginally faster and the RX 580 2048SP being nearly identical.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 81.8 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate, with a 21.8 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, averaging 68 FPS. This is 8 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 51.3 FPS and is therefore not recommended for sustained play.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS. The Low preset comes closest at 55.6 FPS, but it still falls short of the playable threshold. The data shows no viable settings for 4K with this configuration.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160. At 1080p, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset averaging 81.8 FPS. This makes 1080p the only resolution where the maximum settings are playable. At 1440p, the High preset averages 68 FPS, providing a playable experience with high visual fidelity. The Medium preset averages 78.3 FPS and Low averages 107.3 FPS, both also playable.

At 4K, the verdict is clear: this combination cannot maintain 60 FPS on any preset. The Low preset averages 55.6 FPS, which is the closest result but still below the threshold. The Medium preset averages 43.4 FPS, High averages 36.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 27.3 FPS. Users targeting 4K would need to accept frame rates well below the playable standard or consider a different GPU. For the majority of gaming scenarios, the data supports 1440p High as the optimal balance of quality and performance, with 1080p Ultra as an alternative for those prioritizing visual settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 128 MB L3 cache, place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 0.4% of its average benchmark score, indicating that CPU performance is not a limiting factor in this game. The Arc B580, in contrast, sits in the 68th percentile of GPUs, with nearest rivals spanning a 1.7% range in average scores.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this dynamic. At 1080p, the average FPS across presets ranges from 81.8 to 161.3, a spread of 79.5 FPS. At 1440p, the range narrows to 51.3 to 107.3 FPS, a spread of 56 FPS. At 4K, the range tightens further to 27.3 to 55.6 FPS, a spread of 28.3 FPS. This diminishing spread as resolution increases indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The CPU's role is consistent across all resolutions, while the GPU's workload scales with pixel count.

The preset scaling within each resolution further illustrates the GPU's influence. At 4K, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS by 28.3 FPS, a 51% decrease. At 1440p, the same move reduces the average by 56 FPS, a 52% decrease. At 1080p, the reduction is 79.5 FPS, a 49% decrease. The relative impact of settings is similar across resolutions, but the absolute frame rates at 4K are too low to reach the playable threshold. This indicates that the GPU's raw throughput is insufficient for 4K in Minimum, regardless of CPU capability.