Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 67 | 78 | 101 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 126 | 151 | 195 |
| 1080p Full HD | 147 | 191 | 228 | 302 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers a robust performance profile in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. Benchmark data shows the system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at most settings and resolutions, with the only exception being the Ultra preset at 4K. The measured results indicate a strong pairing where the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's substantial multithreaded capabilities ensure headroom at lower settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 302 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 227.9 FPS, while High yields 191.2 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a high average of 146.5 FPS. This represents a performance delta of 155.5 FPS between the lowest and highest settings, indicating the GPU is not heavily taxed at this resolution and the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high but show a more pronounced impact from settings changes. Low preset averages 195.1 FPS, Medium drops to 151 FPS, and High reaches 125.5 FPS. Ultra falls to an average of 96.1 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a reduction of 99 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU begins to take on a more significant role as pixel count increases.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture shifts considerably. The Low preset still delivers an average of 101.4 FPS, and Medium maintains 77.9 FPS. High drops to 67.4 FPS, which remains playable but with less margin. The Ultra preset falls below the playability threshold with an average of 50.2 FPS. This is the only configuration in the measured data that fails to hit 60 FPS, representing a 51.2 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K. The data shows that resolution scaling has a stronger effect on performance than settings changes at the higher end of the resolution spectrum.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD EPYC 9015 with a score of 57555 and a delta of -0.1%, placing it essentially at parity with the Ryzen 9 9900X. The AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57399, a 0.2% delta, also showing nearly identical performance. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, which is 1.1% higher, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, 1.4% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow 2.5% band, meaning systems built with any of these CPUs would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Minimum, assuming the same GPU is used.
On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RX 7900 XT are notably different in class. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13812 with a -0.5% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821 with a -0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871 at -0.9%, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543 at 1.5% higher. Despite the RX 7900 XT's 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs, these rival comparisons suggest that in this specific title, the integrated and mobile graphics solutions listed are close in average benchmark terms. However, the measured FPS data shows the RX 7900 XT delivers 4K Ultra at 50.2 FPS, which indicates that benchmark scores alone do not fully capture the gaming performance in Minimum.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high that the CPU's role becomes more prominent, as the GPU can process frames quickly enough to be limited by the processor's ability to issue draw calls and manage game logic. The difference between Low (302 FPS) and Ultra (146.5 FPS) at this resolution is 155.5 FPS, showing that settings changes have a large impact, but even the lowest preset does not bottleneck the system.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to exert more influence. The scaling from Low (195.1 FPS) to Ultra (96.1 FPS) shows a 99 FPS reduction, which is a smaller absolute drop than at 1080p but still substantial. The CPU remains capable of maintaining high frame rates, as evidenced by the 195.1 FPS Low preset figure, but the GPU's workload increases with pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The Low preset still achieves 101.4 FPS, indicating the CPU can handle the game logic at that frame rate, but the Ultra preset drops to 50.2 FPS. This 51.2 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is proportionally larger than at lower resolutions, confirming that the GPU's rendering load is the primary constraint. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, along with its high boost clock of 5.60 GHz, provide sufficient processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck in any of the tested configurations, as evidenced by the consistent performance at lower settings across all resolutions.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher in most scenarios. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 146.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same holds true, with Ultra reaching 96.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding playable option, averaging 67.4 FPS, while Low and Medium also exceed the threshold at 101.4 FPS and 77.9 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset at 4K is the sole exception, falling to 50.2 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
The verdict by resolution confirms the system's capability for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and for high-settings gaming at 4K. The data shows that players seeking 4K Ultra settings would need to adjust expectations, but the combination of the Ryzen 9 9900X and RX 7900 XT is otherwise well-suited for this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 146.5 FPS. This provides a substantial margin over the playability threshold, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, delivering an average of 96.1 FPS. This leaves a comfortable 36.1 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for consistent performance even in demanding scenes.
At 3840x2160, the best setting is High, which achieves an average of 67.4 FPS. While this is above 60 FPS, the margin is smaller, around 7.4 FPS. The Medium preset offers a larger buffer at 77.9 FPS, but High provides the best visual fidelity among the playable options at this resolution.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with maximum settings?*
A: No. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 50.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The High preset at this resolution averages 67.4 FPS and is the best playable option.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average is 302 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the peak performance point in the measured data.
Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 9 9900X has an average benchmark score of 57498. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9015 at 57555 (-0.1% delta) and the AMD EPYC 7313 at 57399 (0.2% delta). The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, which is 1.1% higher.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 2560x1440?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 96.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the best recommended setting at that resolution.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 302 FPS, while Ultra averages 146.5 FPS. This represents a difference of 155.5 FPS between the two settings.
*Q: What rank does this combo hold among all tested combinations in Minimum?*
A: This combination of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 737th out of 3712 tested combos in the game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 737th out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum, placing it in the top 20% of all tested hardware pairs. This ranking reflects the system's ability to deliver high frame rates across most resolutions and settings, as detailed in the measured FPS data. The 4K Ultra shortfall prevents a higher ranking, but the overall performance profile is strong, with the system capable of exceeding 60 FPS in 11 out of 12 tested configurations. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs contribute to this balanced result, where the CPU provides significant headroom and the GPU handles the rendering load effectively at most settings.