Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
187 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
59 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
65 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 53,288
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 42 50 65
1440p QHD 59 78 92 121
1080p Full HD 92 120 143 187

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 120
1920x1080 Low 187
1920x1080 Medium 143
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Low 121
2560x1440 Medium 92
2560x1440 Ultra 59
3840x2160 High 42
3840x2160 Low 65
3840x2160 Medium 50
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a modern desktop combination aimed squarely at high-refresh gaming. In the 2014 third-person shooter Minimum, this pairing delivers a wide spread of performance depending on resolution and quality preset. The data shows a system that is thoroughly capable at 1080p, comfortably playable at 1440p, and only at 4K does it require a compromise in settings to maintain a smooth frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold across every tested preset. The Low preset averages 187 FPS, while stepping up to High yields 120 FPS. The Medium preset posts an average of 143 FPS, with a minimum of 122 FPS and a maximum of 165 FPS. Ultra is still exceptionally fast at an average of 92 FPS. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot, with headroom for high refresh rate monitors even at the most demanding settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the scaling from 1080p is evident. The Low preset drops to an average of 121 FPS. High settings produce an average of 78 FPS, while Medium averages 92 FPS (min 79 FPS, max 106 FPS). The Ultra preset lands exactly at the edge of playability with an average of 59 FPS, just one frame below the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that at 1440p, players must choose between Ultra and a High preset that offers a comfortable margin above the minimum target.

At 3840x2160, the load shifts decisively toward the GPU. The Low preset is the only setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS, coming in at 65 FPS. Medium averages 50 FPS (min 42 FPS, max 57 FPS), High drops to 42 FPS, and Ultra falls to 32 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is a massive 33 FPS, indicating that the RX 9060's 8 GB memory buffer and compute resources are stretched thin at 4K with higher-quality assets.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 2179 out of 3712 tested combinations for Minimum. This percentile position, roughly in the 41st percentile, tells an important story. While the absolute FPS numbers at 1080p are very high, this rank considers the entire field of tested hardware. The top of the leaderboard is likely occupied by combinations with significantly more powerful GPUs, meaning that for this particular title, the RX 9060 is the limiting factor relative to the top tier. The Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-end CPU (91st percentile among all CPUs), but the GPU's 59th percentile standing pulls the combined rank down. This suggests that in Minimum, the pairing is solidly mid-pack overall, despite delivering excellent playable results at mainstream resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 9 7900X and the Radeon RX 9060. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the dominant factor. The 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor provides ample headroom, as evidenced by the massive frame rates across all presets. The scaling from Low (187 FPS) to Ultra (92 FPS) is roughly a 50% reduction, which is primarily driven by increased GPU work, but the absolute numbers show the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The frame rate drop from 1080p is proportionally larger, indicating that the GPU is becoming a more significant constraint. For instance, High settings drop from 120 FPS at 1080p to 78 FPS at 1440p, a 35% reduction. This is a steeper decline than the resolution pixel count alone would suggest, pointing to the GPU's memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) and 128-bit bus being taxed by the higher pixel output.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unquestionably the bottleneck. The performance collapse from 1440p to 4K is dramatic. The High preset falls from 78 FPS to 42 FPS, a 46% loss. The Ultra preset's 32 FPS result indicates that the RX 9060 lacks the raw fillrate and memory capacity for 4K Ultra in this title. The CPU's role is minimized here; even a faster GPU would be constrained by the game's engine at this resolution, but the current data shows the RX 9060 cannot maintain 60 FPS at High or above.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with the Ultra preset?*

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 32 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is Low, with an average of 65 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality setting at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The High preset is the best option, with an average of 78 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 59 FPS, just missing the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060's average benchmark score is 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129. This indicates nearly identical overall performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7900X a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No. The CPU scores in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and the FPS results at 1080p (e.g., 187 FPS on Low) show no sign of CPU limitation. The processor's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2617) is more than sufficient.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The Low preset averages 187 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 92 FPS. This represents a 95 FPS difference, showing the significant GPU workload increase from the Ultra preset.

Q: Does the game run better at 1440p Low than at 1080p Ultra?

A: Yes. The 1440p Low preset averages 121 FPS, which is 29 FPS higher than the 1080p Ultra preset's 92 FPS. This shows that resolution scaling has less impact than the quality preset at these settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Ryzen 9 7900X sits very close to several other processors in benchmark scores. The AMD EPYC 7313P is a near-match with a score of 53206, a mere 0.2% lower. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620 (0.6% higher). In gaming, these would all provide similar CPU-side performance, though the consumer i7-14700F is the most likely alternative for a desktop gaming build.

On the GPU side, the RX 9060's average score of 16014 is bracketed by several familiar cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, just 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852 (1% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679 (2.1% lower). In practice, the RTX 3060 Ti would be the closest direct competitor, offering essentially identical performance in Minimum.

Best Settings per Resolution

For a target of at least 60 FPS average, the optimal settings are as follows.

At 3840x2160, the only preset that clears the threshold is Low, with an average of 65 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K.

At 2560x1440, the High preset provides the best visual quality while staying above the target, with an average of 78 FPS. The Medium preset also works (92 FPS), but High offers better visuals for a still-comfortable frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, averaging 92 FPS. This delivers the maximum visual fidelity while maintaining a frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high refresh rate displays.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Minimum? Yes, decisively. The verdict by resolution shows a clear pattern of capability.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four presets, including Ultra at 92 FPS. This is a fully playable and highly enjoyable experience.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High (78 FPS), Medium (92 FPS), and Low (121 FPS). Only the Ultra preset falls just short at 59 FPS, which is still borderline playable but technically one frame below the standard.

At 3840x2160, the system is playable only on Low settings (65 FPS). Medium (50 FPS), High (42 FPS), and Ultra (32 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. For 4K gaming, the user must accept a significant reduction in visual quality to maintain smooth performance.

The data indicates that this CPU-GPU combination is an excellent choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Minimum. The 4K experience is limited by the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity, but the system remains functional at lower settings. The Ryzen 9 7900X provides ample CPU power for this title, ensuring that the RX 9060 is the primary performance variable across all resolutions.