Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
230 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
110 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
149 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
72 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
79 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
40 FPS
6.9ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,208

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 51 59 79
1440p QHD 72 96 114 149
1080p Full HD 110 144 174 230

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 144
1920x1080 Low 230
1920x1080 Medium 174
1920x1080 Ultra 110
2560x1440 High 96
2560x1440 Low 149
2560x1440 Medium 114
2560x1440 Ultra 72
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 40

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers a strong, but not flawless, experience in Minimum. At 1080p and 1440p, this pairing is unequivocally capable of maxing out the game’s Ultra preset with average frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. However, at 4K, the system falls short of that target on the most demanding settings, requiring a drop to Low for a smooth experience. The data shows a clear performance ceiling that is tied directly to resolution scaling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo reveal a predictable pattern: performance scales down as resolution increases, with the gap between settings widening at higher pixel counts. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast, with even the most demanding preset producing an average of 109.8 FPS. The Low preset at this resolution hits 229.6 FPS on average, while Medium and High land at 173.9 FPS and 144.4 FPS, respectively. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are not the limiting factor; the headroom available is substantial, making the Ultra preset the clear choice for fluid gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates remain high, though the scaling is more pronounced. The Ultra preset averages 72.4 FPS, which is still comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings produce an average of 96.1 FPS, Medium reaches 114.3 FPS, and Low peaks at 149.3 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this hardware, as it can maintain high visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 34% on the Ultra preset, but the absolute numbers remain strong.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limits become apparent. The Ultra preset averages just 39.6 FPS, which is well below the playable threshold and would result in a stuttering or sluggish experience. High settings fare better at 51.4 FPS, but this still misses the 60 FPS mark. Medium settings average 59.2 FPS, narrowly missing the target. The Low preset is the only option that clears the threshold, with an average of 79 FPS. This represents a 50% performance drop from the 1440p Ultra result, illustrating how taxing 4K is on the RTX 3070. The absence of min and max FPS data in the measured results means we can only speak to average performance, but the averages alone are decisive in showing the 4K limitations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The hardware closest to this combo’s performance profile provides useful context. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51947, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.2% lower), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301 (0.7% lower). In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, meaning the game’s performance is unlikely to differ meaningfully if one of these CPUs were swapped in.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (score 17083, 0.7% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (score 17037, 1% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (score 17019, 1.1% higher), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (score 17468, 1.5% lower). The delta percentages are all within a couple of points, meaning that in a game like Minimum, a user with an RX 7600 XT would see virtually the same frame rates as this RTX 3070 setup. The differences are within the margin of error for real-world testing, so these alternatives represent a near-identical experience.

Best Settings per Resolution

Determining the best settings requires balancing visual quality against the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the obvious choice, as it delivers an average of 109.8 FPS. Since this is far above the threshold, there is no reason to reduce settings for performance; the Ultra preset provides the highest fidelity while maintaining a very smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again wins. With an average of 72.4 FPS, it clears the 60 FPS requirement by a healthy margin. While High and Medium offer higher frame rates (96.1 and 114.3 FPS, respectively), the Ultra preset’s visual improvements come at a cost that is still acceptable. The data suggests that the extra visual detail is worth the performance trade-off, as the frame rate remains in the playable range.

At 3840x2160, the situation is different. The Low preset is the only one that meets the playability threshold, with an average of 79 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall short at 59.2, 51.4, and 39.6 FPS, respectively. Therefore, the best settings for a playable 4K experience are Low. While this sacrifices graphical fidelity, it is the only way to achieve a smooth frame rate at this resolution. The step down from Medium (59.2 FPS) to Low (79 FPS) represents a 33% performance increase, making the trade-off necessary.

The Verdict

The central question is whether this PC can run Minimum effectively. The data from the verdictByResolution field provides a definitive answer. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on all presets, with the best being Ultra at 109.8 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra at 72.4 FPS being the best. This means that for the vast majority of gamers using 1080p or 1440p monitors, this combo is not just playable—it is excellent, offering high visual quality with a large performance buffer.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The only playable setting is Low, which averages 79 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fail to reach 60 FPS, with averages of 59.2, 51.4, and 39.6 FPS, respectively. Therefore, the system can run Minimum at 4K, but only with significant visual compromises. A user seeking a native 4K experience with high settings would be disappointed, as the RTX 3070’s 8 GB of memory and overall compute power are not sufficient for this title at that resolution. The conclusion is that this PC is a strong performer, but its 4K capabilities are strictly limited to the lowest settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with Ultra settings?*

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 39.6, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 72.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to the RX 7600 XT in this game?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, while the RX 7600 XT scores 17083, a 0.7% difference. This suggests near-identical performance in Minimum.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 3070?

A: The data does not indicate a bottleneck. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51947, placing it in the 91st percentile, and its performance is closely matched by rivals like the Core i9-13900F.

Q: What average FPS can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 173.9, which is far above the playable threshold.

Q: Which 4K preset is the only one that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The Low preset at 3840x2160 is the only one that averages above 60 FPS, with a result of 79 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is positioned at rank 1633 out of 3712 total combos. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, specifically within the 44th percentile of performance. While it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms the majority of setups that have been benchmarked for this game. This ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data: the system is very strong at 1080p and 1440p, but its 4K performance drags down its overall standing. The rank reflects a capable gaming machine that is held back from the top echelons solely by its inability to handle 4K Ultra settings, which is a common limitation for hardware of this generation. For a game like Minimum, this combo sits in a respectable mid-to-upper tier, offering a great experience for most users but not the absolute highest level of performance.