Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
173 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
84 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
113 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 41 47 59
1440p QHD 54 70 87 113
1080p Full HD 84 109 130 173

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 173
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 Ultra 84
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Low 113
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination delivers a wide range of frame rates in Minimum, depending on resolution and preset. The data shows a clear pattern: 1080p is fully playable at every tested setting, 1440p is playable up to High, and 4K does not maintain 60 FPS at any preset. The measured results provide exact figures for twelve configurations, allowing a precise breakdown of where this hardware excels and where it falls short.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results. The Low preset reaches an average of 172.5 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded across all configurations. Medium drops to 130.2 FPS, still far above the 60 FPS threshold. High averages 108.9 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset holds at 84.1 FPS. Every 1080p setting clears the playable threshold by a substantial margin, with the gap ranging from 24.1 FPS at Ultra to 112.5 FPS at Low.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably but remain competitive. Low averages 112.7 FPS, which is a 35% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium produces 86.6 FPS, and High comes in at 69.8 FPS. Ultra is the only 1440p setting that falls below 60 FPS, averaging 54.4 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a steady decline of roughly 26 FPS between adjacent settings, with the steepest drop occurring between High and Ultra (15.4 FPS).

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low averages 58.5 FPS, just 1.5 FPS short of the playable threshold. Medium drops to 46.9 FPS, High falls to 41.2 FPS, and Ultra averages only 26.5 FPS. The 4K results show a different scaling pattern than lower resolutions: the gap between Low and Medium is 11.6 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 14.7 FPS. This suggests that the most demanding preset at 4K imposes a disproportionately heavy load on the RTX 3060 Ti, likely due to memory bandwidth limitations at higher pixel counts. None of the 4K settings reach 60 FPS, and the best result at this resolution is within 2.5% of the target.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU both have nearby performance equivalents based on average benchmark scores. The Ryzen 9 5950X sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,947. Its closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, which scores 52,073, a difference of 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730 (0.4% lower). The Intel Core i7-14700 is the furthest of the four listed rivals, scoring 52,301, which is 0.7% above the 5950X. In practical terms, all four alternatives would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minimum.

The RTX 3060 Ti ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,129. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scoring 16,014, which is 0.7% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16,351, coming in 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT also scores 16,351, also 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is the low scorer among these rivals at 15,862, which is 1.7% below the 3060 Ti. These small deltas mean that swapping the GPU for any of these alternatives would shift frame rates by only a few FPS in most scenarios. For a game like Minimum, which is not particularly demanding at 1080p, the differences would be most noticeable at 4K Ultra, where a 1.7% slower GPU would likely drop the average from 26.5 FPS to roughly 26 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 84.1, which is 24.1 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 69.8 FPS. Ultra falls short at 54.4 FPS.

Q: Is there any 4K preset that reaches 60 FPS?

A: No. The highest 4K result is Low at 58.5 FPS, followed by Medium at 46.9 FPS, High at 41.2 FPS, and Ultra at 26.5 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs between 1080p and 1440p at the same settings?

A: At Low, the drop is from 172.5 FPS to 112.7 FPS (59.8 FPS lower). At High, the drop is from 108.9 FPS to 69.8 FPS (39.1 FPS lower). At Ultra, the drop is from 84.1 FPS to 54.4 FPS (29.7 FPS lower).

Q: Which component is more likely to limit performance at 4K?

A: The GPU, based on the data. At 4K, the frame rates fall consistently below the 60 FPS threshold even at Low settings, while the CPU's performance rank (91st percentile) suggests it is not the bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested combinations for this game?

A: The combo ranks 2,512th out of 3,712 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of all configurations tested for Minimum.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Minimum at 1080p and 1440p with specific settings, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold: Low (172.5 FPS), Medium (130.2 FPS), High (108.9 FPS), and Ultra (84.1 FPS). At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: Low (112.7 FPS), Medium (86.6 FPS), and High (69.8 FPS). Ultra at 1440p averages 54.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 58.5 FPS, which is 1.5 FPS short. The verdict is clear: for a consistent 60 FPS experience, the maximum resolution is 1440p with High settings, or 1080p with Ultra settings. For players prioritizing higher resolutions, the 4K Low preset is the only option worth attempting, and it still falls short of the playable threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strong multithreaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017) helps maintain high frame rates across all presets, with even the Ultra preset holding above 84 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 51% performance reduction (from 172.5 FPS to 84.1 FPS), which reflects the GPU's workload increasing with graphical fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p is larger at lower presets: Low drops by 59.8 FPS (35%), while Ultra drops by 29.7 FPS (35%). This consistent percentage reduction suggests that the GPU is scaling linearly with pixel count, and the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck at these settings. The 1440p results at High (69.8 FPS) and Ultra (54.4 FPS) show that the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most settings but not for the highest preset at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting component. The frame rates drop below 60 FPS even at Low settings, and the gap between Low and Ultra (58.5 FPS vs. 26.5 FPS) shows a 55% reduction. The CPU's performance at this resolution is unlikely to matter, as the GPU is fully saturated by the pixel count. The 4K results suggest that the RTX 3060 Ti's memory bandwidth and compute throughput are insufficient for this game at this resolution, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 9 5950X and RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 2,512th out of 3,712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the 32nd percentile of all configurations tested. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-tier position (59th percentile among all GPUs) combined with a high-end CPU (91st percentile among all CPUs). The GPU's lower standing drags the overall combo rank down, as the game is likely GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The rank suggests that while the CPU is overqualified for this game, the GPU limits the overall experience, particularly at 4K. For comparison, the GPU's nearest rivals (RX 9060, Pro 5600M, RX 5700 XT, R9 370X) would all likely produce similar combo ranks, as their performance deltas are within 1.7% of the 3060 Ti.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 84.1 FPS. This is the best possible setting at this resolution, and the frame rate headroom of 24.1 FPS provides a buffer for demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, with an average of 69.8 FPS. This leaves 9.8 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 1440p averages 54.4 FPS, which is 5.6 FPS below the target, so it is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best option is Low, which averages 58.5 FPS, but this is still 1.5 FPS short of the threshold. Players at 4K would need to accept frame rates below 60 FPS or reduce resolution. The data shows that the 1080p Ultra and 1440p High presets are the optimal configurations for this hardware, offering the best balance of visual quality and performance.