Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a strong 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, with 4K requiring a settings reduction. This combination of a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 processor and a 12 GB RDNA 2 graphics card produces frame rates that are smooth across most of the tested configurations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the benchmark database, the CPU and GPU in this combo each sit near specific rivals that would produce broadly comparable in-game behavior.

For the processor, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X posts an average benchmark score of 51,947, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its closest competitors are within a fraction of a percent in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730, which is 0.4% lower, making it effectively a peer in multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52,073) and AMD EPYC 8124P (52,121) are 0.2% and 0.3% higher, respectively, while the Intel Core i7-14700 leads this group by 0.7% with a score of 52,301. In practice, any of these chips would not be the limiting factor in Minimum; the GPU will dictate the frame rate, and swapping between these CPUs would yield imperceptible differences in game performance.

On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26,011, which lands it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mix of older workstation and mobile parts that score slightly lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25,891) is 0.5% behind, the AMD FirePro W7100 (25,856) is 0.6% behind, and the AMD FirePro D700 (25,842) trails by 0.7%. The most interesting comparison is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which scores 25,740, putting it 1.1% behind the desktop RX 6750 XT. While these alternatives would not be a direct drop-in replacement for a modern desktop build, the benchmark data suggests that systems with these GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Minimum at the same settings and resolution.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 76.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At Medium settings, the average drops to 58.7 FPS, which falls below that threshold.

Q: What is the best graphics preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is playable with an average of 67.7 FPS. This is the highest settings option available and it still maintains a frame rate above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X scores 26,017 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,614 in single-core. This indicates a very high multi-threaded capability, appropriate for its 16-core and 32-thread configuration, while single-thread performance is also solid for gaming.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This is ample for the textures and assets in Minimum at the tested resolutions.

Q: Is the frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings significantly higher than at 1440p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 103.5 FPS, which is substantially higher than the 67.7 FPS average seen at 2560x1440 with the same preset. The performance headroom at 1080p is considerable.

Q: Does this combo's performance ranking place it in the top half of tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 1,786 out of 3,712 tested combos for this game. This places it just inside the top 48% of all tested system configurations, indicating a mid-to-upper tier standing for playing Minimum.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides a target preset for each resolution that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

• 3840x2160: Low settings yield an average of 76.7 FPS. This is the only playable option at 4K, as Medium falls to 58.7 FPS and High to 45.7 FPS.
• 2560x1440: Ultra settings are achievable with an average of 67.7 FPS. All four presets—Low (139.4 FPS), Medium (103.7 FPS), High (86.4 FPS), and Ultra (67.7 FPS)—exceed the 60 FPS threshold.
• 1920x1080: Ultra settings provide an average of 103.5 FPS. The lower presets offer even higher headroom: High (136.3 FPS), Medium (162.7 FPS), and Low (215.6 FPS).

The Verdict

The data confirms that this system is fully capable of running Minimum above the 60 FPS playable threshold in most scenarios.

At 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal. Every settings preset, from Low to Ultra, clears the 60 FPS bar with significant margin. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 103.5 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a high-refresh-rate monitor.

At 2560x1440, all four presets also remain playable. The most demanding option, Ultra, holds an average of 67.7 FPS, which is above the threshold but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. High settings at 86.4 FPS would provide a more consistent buffer.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, which produce an average of 76.7 FPS. Medium settings drop to 58.7 FPS, just under the playable threshold, and High and Ultra are not viable at 45.7 FPS and 38.8 FPS, respectively. For 4K gaming, users should expect to run on the lowest preset for a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table presents the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 45.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.8 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 86.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 139.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 103.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67.7 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 136.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 215.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 162.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.5 |

The scaling across resolutions is consistent with expectations. The 1080p results show a wide gap between Low and Ultra, with the Ultra preset roughly halving the frame rate of Low. The 1440p results follow a similar pattern, with Low at 139.4 FPS and Ultra at 67.7 FPS. At 4K, the performance drop is steep, with Ultra falling to 38.8 FPS while Low maintains 76.7 FPS. The data shows no minimum or maximum FPS values recorded for any of these tests, so the average is the sole metric for comparison.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is ranked 1,786 out of 3,712 total combos. This places it in the upper-middle portion of all tested systems, with approximately 48% of configurations performing better and 52% performing worse.

Given that the CPU sits in the 91st percentile of all processors, the ranking is clearly constrained by the GPU, which is in the 71st percentile of all graphics cards. The combination's overall standing reflects the balance of these two components. While the CPU has substantial headroom for compute-heavy tasks, the RX 6750 XT is the component that determines the frame rates in Minimum. The rank demonstrates that this system is a competent performer for this title, but not at the top tier of configurations. The measured results show it is more than capable of delivering a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, which is the practical takeaway for most users.