Minimum

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X sits within a tightly clustered group of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 41,376 places it just 0.3% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, which averages 41,263. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H trails by 0.4% with 41,215, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also sits 0.4% behind with 41,208. The only rival that edges ahead is the Intel Core i7-14650HX, which posts 41,576, a 0.5% advantage over the Ryzen 9 5900X. For gaming workloads, swapping between these processors would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, as the performance deltas are all under a single percentage point.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER shows a similar pattern among graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 18,093 is within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which scores 18,159. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 comes in at 18,189, a 0.5% gap, while the AMD Radeon RX 460 reaches 18,373, putting it 1.5% ahead. The Intel Arc A770M closes the group at 18,383, also 1.6% ahead. These margins are small enough that in practice, any of these GPUs would deliver comparable frame rates in most titles, including this third-person shooter.

The Ryzen 9 5900X ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs tested, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The RTX 2060 SUPER, by contrast, sits in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, a more mid-pack position. This asymmetry matters for understanding where bottlenecks may appear: the processor has considerable headroom, while the graphics card defines the practical ceiling for this pairing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 5900X and the RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2,685 out of 3,712 tested combos for this game. That places it in the lower third of all system pairings, which is a useful reality check. The CPU is a high-end part by percentile rank, but the GPU's mid-tier standing pulls the overall combo down relative to systems built around faster graphics cards.

In practical terms, this ranking means the pairing is not among the top configurations for Minimum, but it is far from the bottom. The database shows 1,027 combos ranking below this one, so there is a substantial group of systems that would perform worse. The rank reflects the GPU-bound nature of the game at higher settings: the processor can feed the graphics card easily, but the frame rate ultimately depends on what the RTX 2060 SUPER can render.

For a game released in 2014, this pairing is more than adequate at standard resolutions. The ranking is dragged down by comparisons to modern flagship GPUs, not by any fundamental weakness in this particular setup. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable performance across every preset, which is the resolution most users of this hardware generation would target.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 1920x1080 monitor?

A: Yes. The database shows average frame rates of 111.9 FPS on High, 127.5 FPS on Medium, 173 FPS on Low, and 84.1 FPS on Ultra at 1920x1080. Every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440?

A: High is the most demanding preset that remains playable, with an average of 69.2 FPS. Ultra drops to 51.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 57.4 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold. High averages 37.7 FPS, Medium 43.4 FPS, and Ultra 29.6 FPS. The verdict by resolution lists no playable settings at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER averages 18,093 in benchmark scores. The RTX 3060 Mobile is 0.4% faster, the Radeon Pro 5700 is 0.5% faster, and the Radeon RX 460 is 1.5% faster. The Intel Arc A770M leads the group at 1.6% faster. All differences are minor.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5900X compare to similar CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41,376 on average. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is 0.5% faster, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is 0.3% slower, and both the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 are 0.4% slower. Performance is nearly identical across this group.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking?

A: This pairing ranks 2,685 out of 3,712 tested combinations for Minimum, placing it in the lower third of systems in the database.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum, but the answer depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset. The best playable setting is Ultra, which averages 84.1 FPS, comfortably above the threshold. High reaches 111.9 FPS, Medium 127.5 FPS, and Low 173 FPS. Any of these presets delivers a smooth experience on a 1080p display.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on three presets: High at 69.2 FPS, Medium at 84.7 FPS, and Low at 109 FPS. The High preset is the most demanding option that still holds above 60 FPS. Ultra falls short at 51.5 FPS, so users who want maximum visual quality at this resolution would need to accept a frame rate below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: no preset achieves 60 FPS. Low comes closest at 57.4 FPS, but that is still 2.6 FPS short. Medium averages 43.4 FPS, High 37.7 FPS, and Ultra 29.6 FPS. The database records no playable settings for this resolution, so 4K gaming is not viable with this hardware.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a system that becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 SUPER has enough headroom to push frame rates above 100 FPS on most presets, and the Ryzen 9 5900X's strong single-thread performance ensures the CPU does not become a limiting factor. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 88.9 FPS, which indicates that graphics settings have a substantial impact on the workload.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling shows the GPU starting to feel the pressure. Ultra drops to 51.5 FPS, a 32.6 FPS reduction from 1080p Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 57.5 FPS, compared to 88.9 FPS at 1080p, suggesting that pixel throughput is becoming a larger share of the total cost.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. The difference between Low and Ultra shrinks further to 27.8 FPS, and even the lowest settings cannot reach the playable threshold. The CPU's role at this resolution is minimal: the Ryzen 9 5900X can feed frames far faster than the RTX 2060 SUPER can render them. Upgrading the processor would yield no measurable benefit at 4K, while upgrading the graphics card would directly improve frame rates.

The percentile data reinforces this interpretation. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile means the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing. For users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU still has room to spare, but for 1440p and above, the GPU dictates performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, which delivers 84.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, and it still leaves a 24.1 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is High, averaging 69.2 FPS. This preset provides a 9.2 FPS cushion over the playable threshold while offering higher visual quality than Medium or Low.

At 3840x2160, there is no best setting because no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest option is Low at 57.4 FPS, but it falls short of the playable threshold, so the database assigns no playable settings for this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded measurements cover three resolutions and four quality presets each, for a total of twelve data points. All values are average frame rates; minimum and maximum frames were not recorded in the database.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows: Low averages 57.4 FPS, Medium 43.4 FPS, High 37.7 FPS, and Ultra 29.6 FPS. The progression shows a steady decline as quality increases, with Ultra delivering roughly half the frame rate of Low.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 109 FPS, Medium 84.7 FPS, High 69.2 FPS, and Ultra 51.5 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance for this hardware: three presets remain playable, and the top playable preset, High, keeps a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the numbers are strongest: Low hits 173 FPS, Medium 127.5 FPS, High 111.9 FPS, and Ultra 84.1 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at the lowest resolution outperforms every 1440p result except Low. The 1080p data confirms that this pairing is well suited for gamers who prioritize frame rate over resolution, with all presets offering a smooth experience and the lowest settings approaching high refresh rate territory.