Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 19 | 23 | 30 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 35 | 42 | 55 |
| 1080p Full HD | 42 | 55 | 65 | 85 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for this AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Arc B370 combination in Minimum shows a clear performance ceiling that varies dramatically by resolution. At 3840x2160, every preset fails to reach playable territory. The best result at 4K comes from the Low preset, which averages 30 FPS. Medium follows at 23 FPS with a recorded range between 19 and 26 FPS. High drops to 19 FPS, while Ultra bottoms out at 15 FPS. None of these figures approach the 60 FPS playability threshold, and the data indicates that 4K is simply outside this combo's capability for this title.
Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains sub-60 across the board. Low settings deliver an average of 55 FPS, which is tantalizingly close to the 60 FPS target but still short. Medium averages 42 FPS with a min-max spread of 36 to 48 FPS, showing noticeable frame pacing variation. High settings drop to 35 FPS, and Ultra falls to 27 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 13 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 8 FPS. Even at the lowest preset, 1440p cannot sustain a stable 60 FPS experience.
At 1920x1080, the picture changes significantly. Low settings deliver a solid 85 FPS average, which is 42% above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings still clear the bar with 65 FPS average, though the min-max range of 56 to 75 FPS indicates occasional dips below 60. High settings average 55 FPS, just missing the target, while Ultra falls to 42 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium costs 20 FPS, from Medium to High costs 10 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs another 13 FPS. For 1080p gaming, the data shows that Low and Medium are the only presets that maintain an average above 60 FPS.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with playable performance?*
A: No. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 30 FPS on Low settings, which is half of the 60 FPS playability threshold. Ultra settings average only 15 FPS at this resolution.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 65 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 85 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that remains playable.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its closest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370's average benchmark score of 1184 places it within a narrow band of older mobile and desktop parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher). The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower.
Q: Does the Ryzen 9 5900X bottleneck the Arc B370 in this game?
A: The CPU is not the limiting factor here. The Ryzen 9 5900X ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41376. The GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that graphics processing is the primary constraint in this pairing.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 42, with a recorded range of 36 to 48 FPS. This falls short of the 60 FPS threshold by 18 FPS.
Q: Is the Arc B370 a discrete GPU or an integrated solution?
A: The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W TDP and no dedicated memory. It uses system shared memory, meaning performance is dependent on the host system's RAM configuration.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 30 FPS, but that is still 30 FPS below the playability threshold. The database records no playable settings for 4K resolution.
At 2560x1440, the same situation applies. Low settings average 55 FPS, which is 5 FPS short of the target. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind. There are no playable settings at 1440p.
At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Medium, which averages 65 FPS. This is the most demanding settings configuration that maintains an average above 60 FPS. Low settings average 85 FPS and provide a larger margin, but Medium offers better visual quality while still clearing the threshold. The min-max range for Medium at 1080p is 56 to 75 FPS, meaning some scenes will dip slightly below 60 FPS, but the average remains playable.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have close rivals in the database that would produce nearly identical results in this game.
For the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, the nearest rivals are separated by less than 1% in average benchmark score. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41263, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen's 41376 average. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41215, a 0.4% deficit. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also scores 41208, another 0.4% gap. On the higher side, the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, which is 0.5% higher. Any of these processors paired with the same GPU would deliver effectively indistinguishable frame rates in Minimum.
For the Intel Arc B370, the rival landscape is equally tight. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, just 0.2% above the Arc's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a 0.5% advantage. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. These GPUs would all produce nearly identical performance, meaning users with any of these older graphics solutions can expect the same FPS ranges recorded for the Arc B370.
The performance delta between the CPU and GPU rivals is minimal, so swapping any of these components for their nearest rivals would not meaningfully change the gaming experience in Minimum.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Minimum depends entirely on resolution and settings. The data shows a clear split: 1080p is playable with the right settings, while 1440p and 4K are not.
At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with Low settings (85 FPS average) and Medium settings (65 FPS average). High settings at 55 FPS and Ultra at 42 FPS fall short. The best playable configuration is Medium at 1080p, which delivers 65 FPS average. This is the recommended setup for a smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings come closest at 55 FPS, but that is still below the playability threshold. The recorded data shows no playable settings at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system is far from playable. The best result is 30 FPS on Low, which is half the required frame rate. Ultra settings produce only 15 FPS.
The verdict is conditional: this combination can run Minimum at 1080p with Medium or Low settings, but it cannot sustain playable frame rates at 1440p or 4K. Users targeting higher resolutions would need a more powerful GPU, as the Arc B370's integrated nature and 5th percentile GPU ranking make it the primary bottleneck.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database's rankings for Minimum, this AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 3425 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all system configurations tested for this game. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe limitations rather than the CPU's capabilities, as the Ryzen 9 5900X sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs while the Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs.
The combination's rank is consistent with the measured FPS data: it can handle 1080p at medium settings, but cannot cope with higher resolutions. The wide disparity between CPU and GPU performance tiers means that the system is heavily imbalanced for this title. Upgrading the graphics solution would be the most effective path to improving the rank, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a much stronger GPU. In the context of the database, this combo represents a system where a high-end processor is paired with a low-end integrated GPU, resulting in performance that is constrained almost entirely by the graphics side.