Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
202 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
99 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
70 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
7.7ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 58,386
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 45 54 70
1440p QHD 64 84 100 130
1080p Full HD 99 130 155 202

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 130
1920x1080 Low 202
1920x1080 Medium 155
1920x1080 Ultra 99
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 130
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a combination that handles the Third-Person Shooter Minimum with clear headroom at lower resolutions, but it hits a hard ceiling at 4K. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly capable at 1080p and 1440p, delivering well above the 60 FPS playable threshold across all tested presets. However, at 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and only the Low preset maintains a playable average. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, the role of each component, and how this combo stacks up against the broader benchmark database.

Best Settings per Resolution

The playable threshold for Minimum is 60 FPS average. Benchmark results indicate the most demanding preset that stays at or above this level varies significantly by resolution.

1920x1080: The RTX 4060 has ample performance here. The Ultra preset, the most demanding tested, delivers an average of 99 FPS. This is the clear best choice for a 1080p monitor, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a frame rate nearly 65% above the playable threshold. All tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.

2560x1440: At 1440p, the Ultra preset still holds at an average of 64 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best setting for a 1440p display. The data shows a smooth progression: Low averages 130 FPS, Medium 100 FPS, High 84 FPS, and Ultra 64 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is 20 FPS, but the Ultra preset remains playable, so there is no need to compromise on visual fidelity.

3840x2160: This is where the RTX 4060's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus begin to struggle. The only playable setting is Low, which averages 70 FPS. Medium falls to 54 FPS, High drops to 45 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 34 FPS. If you are targeting 4K, you must accept Low settings to stay above 60 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is a steep 16 FPS, indicating a major performance cliff.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets reveals a distinct shift in system bottleneck. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength is evident. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, ensures that even the Low preset (202 FPS) and Ultra preset (99 FPS) are never constrained by the processor. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 103 FPS drop, which is almost entirely attributed to the GPU's increased workload.

At 2560x1440, the balance begins to tilt toward the GPU. The average FPS at every preset drops from the 1080p figures (e.g., High goes from 130 to 84 FPS), showing that the rendering load is now more significant. The CPU is still providing enough headroom to keep the Ultra preset at 64 FPS, but the GPU is the primary driver of the differences between presets.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU's high single-core performance (evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228) cannot compensate for the GPU's raw throughput limits at this pixel count. The scaling from Low (70 FPS) to Ultra (34 FPS) is a 36 FPS drop, and the fact that Medium cannot hold 60 FPS shows that the RTX 4060's compute and memory bandwidth are saturated. The CPU is effectively waiting on the GPU at 4K, rendering its additional headroom irrelevant for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the exact measured average FPS for the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination. Min and max values are only available for the Medium preset at each resolution.

1920x1080:

  • Low: Average 202 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 155 FPS, with a minimum of 131 FPS and a maximum of 178 FPS.
  • High: Average 130 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 99 FPS. Min and max not recorded.

2560x1440:

  • Low: Average 130 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS.
  • High: Average 84 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 64 FPS. Min and max not recorded.

3840x2160:

  • Low: Average 70 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. This is the only instance where the minimum FPS dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating stutter potential even on Medium.
  • High: Average 45 FPS. Min and max not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 34 FPS. Min and max not recorded.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Minimum, this specific combo holds rank 2000 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 46% of other CPU/GPU pairings performed better in this game. Given the RTX 4060's GPU percentile vs all GPUs is 61, the combo rank is slightly lower, which suggests that the CPU's high performance (92nd percentile vs all CPUs) is not fully utilized at the resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

The rank implies that while this is a solid mid-range setup for Minimum, it is not a top-tier performer. The data suggests that other combinations with a more powerful GPU would rank significantly higher, especially at 4K. The combo's strength is its consistency; it delivers playable frame rates at all settings for 1080p and 1440p, but its 4K performance pulls its overall rank down.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are a mix of Intel and AMD processors. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M has an average score of 58323, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's average of 58386. This means they are virtually identical in overall compute performance. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, a 0.5% deficit, while the Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, a 0.2% advantage. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is 0.7% ahead. In-game, any of these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical FPS in Minimum, as the game is not heavily multi-threaded based on the data.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all AMD products, which is notable. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average score of 17666, a 0.2% advantage over the RTX 4060's 17639. This is a much older card, but the benchmark data places it on par, indicating that the RTX 4060's newer architecture does not provide a decisive lead in raw compute for this title. The AMD Radeon 780M (integrated graphics) is 0.3% behind, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% behind, respectively. In practice, you would expect these alternatives to deliver very similar frame rates in Minimum, with the RTX 4060's advantages in features like ray tracing being irrelevant for a 2014 title.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: No. The measured data shows the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages only 34 FPS, which is far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset is playable at 4K, with an average of 70 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice. It maintains an average of 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold, and provides the highest visual quality. The High preset is also playable at 84 FPS, but Ultra offers a better experience without sacrificing performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The GPU is more important for determining frame rate differences between presets. For example, the drop from Low (202 FPS) to Ultra (99 FPS) is a 103 FPS reduction. The CPU provides sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking, as indicated by its high benchmark scores, but the GPU's workload scaling drives the FPS changes.

Q: Why does the Medium preset at 4K have a minimum FPS below 60?

A: The data records a minimum of 46 FPS for Medium at 3840x2160, despite an average of 54 FPS. This indicates that while the average is below the playable threshold, there are moments of more severe frame drops, which could cause noticeable stuttering.

*Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested systems in Minimum?*

A: It ranks 2000 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places it in the 54th percentile, meaning just over half of the other tested systems performed better. The rank is dragged down by the GPU's limitations at 4K.

Q: Are there any AMD GPUs that would perform similarly to the RTX 4060 in this game?

A: Yes. According to the nearest rivals data, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average benchmark score that is 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060. The AMD Radeon 780M, Radeon Pro 560, and Radeon Pro 460 are all within 0.7% of the RTX 4060's score, suggesting they would produce very similar frame rates in Minimum.