Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
42 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
27 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
30 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
15 FPS
18.2ms Frame Time
27ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 58,386
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 15 19 23 30
1440p QHD 27 35 42 55
1080p Full HD 42 55 65 85

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 55
1920x1080 Low 85
1920x1080 Medium 65
1920x1080 Ultra 42
2560x1440 High 35
2560x1440 Low 55
2560x1440 Medium 42
2560x1440 Ultra 27
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Low 30
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 15

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a highly constrained gaming experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter released in June 2014. The recorded data shows that this combination struggles significantly at higher resolutions, with performance only becoming acceptable at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across all tested settings and resolutions, identifies the primary performance bottleneck, and provides clear guidance on what this hardware can actually run.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the baseline for most modern gaming, the results range from 42 FPS to 85 FPS depending on the preset. At Low settings, the average is 85 FPS. Medium settings deliver 65 FPS on average, with a recorded minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 75 FPS. High settings drop to 55 FPS on average. Ultra settings are the weakest at this resolution, producing only 42 FPS on average.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance degrades substantially across the board. The Low preset averages 55 FPS. Medium settings yield 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. The High preset drops to 35 FPS on average, while Ultra settings manage only 27 FPS. None of these averages reach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the results are largely unplayable. The Low preset averages 30 FPS. Medium settings produce 23 FPS on average, with a minimum of 19 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. High settings fall to 19 FPS on average. Ultra settings are the worst, delivering just 15 FPS on average. The data shows a steep falloff from 1080p to 1440p, and an even steeper collapse at 4K.

The only settings that clear the 60 FPS playable threshold are at 1920x1080: Low at 85 FPS and Medium at 65 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also shows the only recorded min/max range that stays mostly within a playable envelope, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 75 FPS. Every other resolution and preset combination either falls short of 60 FPS or sits far below it.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, with 1280 shading units and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Its performance percentile versus all GPUs is 5, which places it in the bottom tier of the database. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D, by contrast, is a high-end desktop CPU with 8 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and a 96 MB shared L3 cache. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 92, indicating a very strong processor.

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D is more than capable of feeding frames, but the Arc B370 cannot translate that CPU performance into high FPS. The scaling between resolutions confirms this: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 85 FPS, which drops to 55 FPS at 1440p Low, and then to 30 FPS at 4K Low. This steep resolution scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering workload increases with pixel count and the CPU has ample headroom.

The settings scaling further reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 85 to 42, a drop of more than half. This is a classic GPU-bound response to increased graphical load. The CPU, with its 92nd percentile standing, is not the bottleneck in any of these configurations. The data suggests that even at 4K, where the CPU should be less stressed, the frame rates remain extremely low because the GPU is overwhelmed.

The Arc B370's memory configuration is "System Shared" with "System Dependent" bandwidth, meaning it relies on the host system's memory. This design further compounds the GPU limitation, as shared memory bandwidth is typically far lower than dedicated VRAM. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, which places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, corroborates the FPS data: this is a low-end graphics solution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Arc B370, based on average benchmark scores, include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186 and is 0.2% faster, and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which scores 1190 and is 0.5% faster. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 and is 0.7% faster, while the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 and is 1.4% slower. These comparisons indicate that the Arc B370 is operating in the same performance tier as decade-old entry-level GPUs. A user experiencing 19 FPS at 4K High or 55 FPS at 1080p High would see nearly identical results with any of these rival cards, as the delta between them is less than 1.5%.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's nearest rivals are all high-end server or desktop processors. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, which is 0.1% slower. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, which is 0.2% faster. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, which is 0.5% slower. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 58826, which is 0.7% faster. These deltas are negligible in gaming terms. Swapping the Ryzen 7 9850X3D for any of these CPUs would not change the FPS in Minimum, because the Arc B370 is the bottleneck. The CPU's performance class is so far above the GPU's that the pairing is fundamentally unbalanced.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Minimum? The verdict is conditional on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the answer is yes for two presets. The Low preset averages 85 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 65 FPS, both clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 55 FPS and Ultra at 42 FPS do not meet the threshold.

At 2560x1440, no settings are playable. The best result is Low at 55 FPS, which is 5 FPS short of the threshold. Medium averages 42 FPS, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra averages 27 FPS. The data shows no playable settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the situation is worse. The best result is Low at 30 FPS, which is half the threshold. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 15 FPS. There are no playable settings at 4K.

The recorded data indicates that this combo is only viable for 1080p gaming on lower presets. Users targeting 1440p or 4K will need to significantly reduce expectations or upgrade the GPU. The playable settings list confirms this: only Low and Medium at 1080p are viable, with Medium being the best preset at 65 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Minimum, this pairing ranks 3425 out of 3712 combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested configurations. The low rank is primarily driven by the GPU's 5th percentile standing. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a top-tier CPU, but it cannot compensate for the Arc B370's limited graphics throughput.

The rank reflects the overall experience: only two settings at one resolution are playable. Many other combos in the database, even those with weaker CPUs, would outperform this pairing if they had a stronger GPU. The data suggests that the Arc B370 is the sole reason for the low rank, and that the CPU's contribution is largely wasted in this configuration.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Minimum?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 85 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Are there any playable settings at 2560x1440?

A: No. The best result at 1440p is Low settings at 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 23, with a minimum of 19 and a maximum of 26.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% faster. The AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower.

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p that stays above 60 FPS?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080, which averages 65 FPS with a minimum of 56 and a maximum of 75.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this pairing?

A: No. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D ranks in the 92nd percentile among CPUs, while the Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile among GPUs. The GPU is the limiting factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium. The recorded average FPS at this setting is 65, with a minimum of 56 and a maximum of 75. Low settings also clear the threshold at 85 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while maintaining playability.

At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 55 FPS, which is below the threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind, so no setting can be recommended for a 60 FPS target at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best average is Low at 30 FPS, which is half the threshold. The data shows that 4K gaming is not viable with this hardware combination.