Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
42 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
27 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
30 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
15 FPS
18.2ms Frame Time
27ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 15 19 23 30
1440p QHD 27 35 42 55
1080p Full HD 42 55 65 85

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 55
1920x1080 Low 85
1920x1080 Medium 65
1920x1080 Ultra 42
2560x1440 High 35
2560x1440 Low 55
2560x1440 Medium 42
2560x1440 Ultra 27
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Low 30
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 15

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

This PC combination, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B370, delivers a highly constrained experience in Minimum. The benchmark data shows a clear ceiling imposed by the graphics processor, and the results vary dramatically depending on the resolution and quality preset selected. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance to determine exactly what this system can achieve.

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data indicates that achieving a stable 60 FPS or higher is only possible at the 1920x1080 resolution. At higher resolutions, the frame rates fall below the playable threshold across all tested settings.

At 3840x2160, none of the four tested presets reach 60 FPS. The highest average frame rate recorded at this resolution is 30 FPS on the Low preset. The High preset delivers an average of 19 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS, and Ultra averages only 15 FPS. Since every setting fails to clear the 60 FPS threshold, no preset can be recommended as a "best" playable option here.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but remains below the playable mark. The Low preset produces an average of 55 FPS, which is the closest this resolution gets to the target. High averages 35 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 27 FPS. All of these remain under 60 FPS, so again, no settings qualify as playable.

At 1920x1080, the system finally crosses the threshold. The Low preset runs at an average of 85 FPS, comfortably above the target. The Medium preset averages 65 FPS, with a minimum recorded of 56 FPS and a maximum of 75 FPS. The High preset drops to an average of 55 FPS, just short of 60 FPS, and Ultra averages 42 FPS. The database indicates the best playable settings at this resolution are Medium, with an average of 65 FPS, as it is the most demanding preset that still maintains an average at or above the 60 FPS threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a stark division of labor between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a high-end desktop processor with a strong benchmark profile, but the Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with a very low performance percentile. The measured frame rates indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at every resolution tested.

This is evident from the scaling between presets. At 1920x1080, dropping from Ultra to Low raises the average frame rate from 42 FPS to 85 FPS, a difference of 43 FPS. Similarly, at 2560x1440, the difference between Ultra and Low is 28 FPS (27 to 55 FPS). At 3840x2160, the difference between Ultra and Low is 15 FPS (15 to 30 FPS). These substantial swings in performance based solely on graphics settings confirm that the workload is heavily bound by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Resolution scaling reinforces this conclusion. Comparing the Low preset across resolutions, the system goes from 85 FPS at 1920x1080 to 55 FPS at 2560x1440 to 30 FPS at 3840x2160. This pattern of halving performance with each step up in resolution is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU's role is largely static; it is not the limiting factor here. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's processing power is sufficient to feed the Arc B370 at all tested settings, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate scales consistently with the GPU's workload rather than plateauing at a CPU-bound ceiling. For this game, the Intel Arc B370 is the component that dictates playability, and the CPU choice has minimal impact on the final frame rate.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*

A: No. The benchmark data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average frame rate recorded is 30 FPS on the Low preset, which falls well below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gameplay?

A: The best playable preset at 1920x1080 is Medium, which delivers an average of 65 FPS. It is the most demanding preset that maintains an average at or above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system averages 42 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold, so it is not considered playable according to the database's criteria.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The GPU is the dominant factor. The frame rates change dramatically with graphics settings and resolution, indicating a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's performance is sufficient to keep up, and its role is minimal in determining the final FPS.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with Low settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the system averages 55 FPS. This is still below the 60 FPS playable threshold, so it does not qualify as a playable configuration.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Medium presets at 1080p?

A: The Low preset averages 85 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 65 FPS. Both are above the 60 FPS threshold, but Medium offers higher visual quality at the cost of 20 FPS on average.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Arc B370 is positioned at rank 3425 out of 3712 total combos. This places it in the bottom portion of all tested systems, which is consistent with the measured performance data. The percentile ranking for the GPU alone is 5, indicating it performs worse than the vast majority of other graphics cards in the database. The CPU, in contrast, sits at the 87th percentile, showing it is a high-performing processor. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a bottom-tier GPU results in a system that is severely limited by its graphics solution. The low overall rank reflects that, in practice, this system performs at a level far below what the CPU alone would suggest, and it is only suitable for the least demanding graphical configurations at 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D's nearest rivals in the database are all very close in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 0.4% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 0.7% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 0.7% higher and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 scores 0.8% lower. These differences are minimal, meaning any of these processors would likely behave nearly identically in this specific game scenario, as the GPU is the limiting factor.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B370's nearest rivals are similarly clustered. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 0.2% lower, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 0.5% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1.4% higher. These are all older or lower-tier graphics solutions that fall within a very narrow performance band of the Arc B370. A user with any of these GPUs paired with a similar CPU would expect nearly the same frame rates in Minimum.

The Verdict

The data provides a clear answer: this PC can run Minimum, but only at 1920x1080 resolution and with specific quality settings. The verdict by resolution shows that 3840x2160 and 2560x1440 have no playable settings, meaning the system cannot maintain an average of 60 FPS at any preset on those resolutions. At 1920x1080, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with the best playable configuration being Medium at an average of 65 FPS. The High preset at 1080p falls just short at 55 FPS, and Ultra is not viable at 42 FPS. This system is suitable for 1080p gaming on lowered settings, but it is not capable of delivering a smooth experience at higher resolutions. The combination is heavily skewed toward the CPU, and the integrated GPU is the definitive constraint on performance.