Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
171 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
84 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
9.1ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 45 59
1440p QHD 54 71 84 110
1080p Full HD 84 110 131 171

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 110
1920x1080 Low 171
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 Ultra 84
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a clear performance profile for Minimum across the three tested resolutions. The data set includes measured average, minimum, and maximum frame rates for each resolution and preset, allowing for a detailed assessment of where this combination excels and where it falls short. The benchmark results indicate a system that is highly capable at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but which struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 3840x2160.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination shows strong performance across all four presets. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 171 FPS. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 131 FPS, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. At High settings, the average is 110 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still produces an average of 84 FPS. This progression shows a smooth scaling of performance as graphical load increases, with the system maintaining a substantial cushion above the 60 FPS threshold even at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain solid but show a noticeable step down from 1080p. The Low preset averages 110 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 84 FPS, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. The High preset averages 71 FPS, which is still comfortably playable. However, the Ultra preset falls to an average of 54 FPS, dipping below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data suggests that the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p imposes a significant cost, particularly on the higher-end presets.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop considerably, and the system struggles to maintain playability. The Low preset is the only one that approaches the 60 FPS mark, averaging 59 FPS. Medium settings average 45 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS. The High preset averages 38 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages just 29 FPS. The benchmark results indicate that 4K resolution is beyond the comfortable reach of this GPU and CPU combination for Minimum.

Best Settings per Resolution

The "best settings" are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, with an average frame rate of 84 FPS. This demonstrates that the system has enough headroom to run the game at maximum graphical quality without compromising smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best option, achieving an average of 71 FPS. While the Medium preset also clears the threshold, High offers a better visual experience while still maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, with its 54 FPS average, is not suitable for playable performance at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings available. The Low preset, with an average of 59 FPS, is the closest to the threshold but still falls short. The verdict data for this resolution lists no playable settings, confirming that the system cannot maintain 60 FPS average at 4K with any preset.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with the highest settings?*

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average frame rate of 84 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four presets at this resolution are listed as playable.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 71 FPS. While Low and Medium are also playable, High provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a solid average above 60 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the presets reach an average of 60 FPS. The Low preset comes closest with 59 FPS, but the verdict data indicates there are no playable settings at this resolution.

Q: How does the frame rate scale from Medium to High settings?

A: The performance cost varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate drops from 131 FPS on Medium to 110 FPS on High. At 2560x1440, the drop is from 84 FPS to 71 FPS. At 3840x2160, the drop is from 45 FPS to 38 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for the Medium preset?

A: The minimum frame rates for the Medium preset are 111 FPS at 1920x1080, 72 FPS at 2560x1440, and 39 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding scenarios?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average is 84 FPS. At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average drops to 54 FPS, which is below the threshold. The system maintains 60 FPS average at 1440p only up to the High preset.

The Verdict

The benchmark data makes the capabilities of this system clear. At 1920x1080, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination can run Minimum with every preset, including Ultra, at an average frame rate above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset achieves 84 FPS, providing a fully smooth experience with maximum graphical settings.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but with restrictions. The High, Medium, and Low presets all clear the 60 FPS threshold, with High being the most demanding playable option at 71 FPS average. The Ultra preset, with an average of 54 FPS, is not recommended for playable performance.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain a playable frame rate. No preset achieves an average of 60 FPS, with the Low preset falling just short at 59 FPS. The verdict is that this PC is not suitable for 4K gaming in Minimum. In summary, this combination is excellent for 1080p and good for 1440p, but it is not a 4K-capable configuration for this title.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high across all presets, with the Low preset reaching 171 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card at lower resolutions.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, indicating that the GPU is becoming more heavily loaded. The drop from 171 FPS at 1080p Low to 110 FPS at 1440p Low shows a significant performance cost from the increased pixel count. This trend continues at 3840x2160, where the Low preset drops further to 59 FPS.

The scaling between presets also points to the GPU's role. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 87 FPS (171 to 84). At 1440p, that difference is 56 FPS (110 to 54). At 4K, the difference narrows to 30 FPS (59 to 29). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is becoming the dominant bottleneck, as the additional pixel workload consumes more of its resources.

The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is a high-performance processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, and it scores in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its benchmark scores, such as a single-thread score of 4691 and a multithread score of 36470, suggest it has more than enough processing power for this game. The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor for achieving higher frame rates, especially at resolutions above 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested combinations in the benchmark database for Minimum, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2549 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the overall distribution, which is consistent with its performance profile: excellent for 1080p, good for 1440p, and insufficient for 4K.

The rank is influenced by the GPU's performance ceiling. The Radeon RX 7600 scores in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, which is a mid-range position. The CPU, in contrast, is much more highly ranked at the 94th percentile. This mismatch suggests that many combos with a more powerful GPU would achieve higher frame rates in Minimum, especially at higher resolutions, and would thus rank higher in the database.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 69996, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 15171. These figures reinforce the idea that the GPU is the less dominant component in this pairing. The combo's rank is a reflection of the overall system's ability to run the game, with the GPU's mid-range standing being the primary factor in its placement.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data provides context for how this hardware compares to other components. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, has an average benchmark score of 69996 and sits very close to several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.2% faster, with an average score of 69875. The Intel Core i7-14700KF is 0.2% slower, with a score of 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.7% faster, with a score of 69515, and the Intel Core i7-14700K is 0.9% faster, with a score of 69355. These deltas are minimal, indicating that any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical performance in Minimum.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, has an average benchmark score of 15171. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which is 0.2% faster with a score of 15199, and the AMD Radeon 680M, which is 0.7% slower with a score of 15270. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X is 0.6% slower with a score of 15082, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 0.7% slower with a score of 15063. These small differences suggest that swapping to any of these GPUs would result in a nearly identical gaming experience in Minimum.

The performance of this system is therefore highly predictable. Users with any of the listed rival CPUs or GPUs can expect frame rates that are statistically indistinguishable from those measured for the Ryzen 7 9700F and RX 7600 combination.