Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 51 | 66 | 79 | 103 |
| 1440p QHD | 94 | 123 | 147 | 192 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 191 | 228 | 297 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 786th out of 3,712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the top 21% of all possible pairings. This is a strong result for a game that launched in 2014, as the combination sits comfortably above the median performer. The percentile data reinforces this, with the CPU ranking in the 85th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, indicating that both components are well above average for their respective categories. The combination’s high rank suggests it will not be the limiting factor in achieving a smooth experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 786 out of 3,712 tested configurations places it in the upper echelon of tested hardware pairings. This ranking is driven by the individual strengths of both components: the Ryzen 7 7700X posts an average benchmark score of 35,909, while the RTX 5070 achieves an average score of 40,377. These scores indicate a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture, provide strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,088 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12,451. Meanwhile, the GPU’s 6,144 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory deliver substantial graphics processing power, reflected in its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077.
What makes this rank particularly notable is that Minimum is not a graphically demanding title by modern standards. The game’s release date of 2014-06-25 means it was designed for hardware from that era, so this modern combination is significantly overqualified. The data confirms this: even at 4K Ultra settings, the combo maintains an average FPS of 51, which is just below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The rank of 786 suggests that while many combinations are faster, the overwhelming majority of tested combos (2,926 out of 3,712) are slower, making this a top-tier setup for this specific game.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals that the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling in Minimum, particularly at higher resolutions. Comparing the 1920x1080 Low preset to the 3840x2160 Low preset, the average FPS drops from 297 to 103, a reduction of 194 FPS. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed as resolution increases. In contrast, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and higher preset levels. At 1920x1080, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 297 to 146, a 51% drop. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU can feed the GPU enough frames to reach very high rates, but the GPU still handles the graphical load.
The scaling between presets at each resolution provides further insight. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 192 (Low) to 94 (Ultra), a 98 FPS spread. At 3840x2160, the range is from 103 (Low) to 51 (Ultra), a 52 FPS spread. The narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes the bottleneck more quickly, as it cannot maintain the same frame rates when pixel count increases. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, are more than sufficient for Minimum’s workload, which is likely single-threaded or lightly threaded given its age. The single-thread performance, as measured by 3DMark’s single-thread score of 1,090 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,987, ensures that the CPU will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers outstanding performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 297 FPS, while Medium yields 228 FPS with a minimum of 193 and maximum of 262. High settings drop to 191 FPS average, and Ultra still maintains a robust 146 FPS. All presets at this resolution are far above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with even the most demanding Ultra preset providing more than double the required frame rate.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains excellent but shows expected scaling. Low settings average 192 FPS, Medium averages 147 FPS (with a minimum of 125 and maximum of 169), High averages 123 FPS, and Ultra averages 94 FPS. The minimum FPS at Medium (125) is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating consistent frame delivery. At 3840x2160, the combo begins to show its limits. Low settings average 103 FPS, Medium averages 79 FPS (with a minimum of 67 and maximum of 91), High averages 66 FPS, and Ultra drops to 51 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 67 FPS confirms that even at 4K, the combo can maintain playable frame rates, but Ultra falls short of the 60 FPS target.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 with an average score of 35,802 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core 7 250H at 35,728 (0.5% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at 35,719 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35,670 (0.7% lower). These processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minimum, with differences of less than 1% in overall benchmark scores. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 at 40,318 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40,063 (0.8% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40,870 (1.2% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at 39,568 (2.0% lower). These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Minimum, with the largest deviation being the RTX A500 Mobile’s 2% lower score.
For a game like Minimum, these rival components would be indistinguishable in practice. The 0.1% to 2% differences in benchmark scores translate to frame rate variations of a few FPS at most, which would not be perceptible to a user. This suggests that users with any of these alternative components would have a nearly identical experience, and the choice between them would come down to other factors such as platform features or availability.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 146 FPS. This is the best visual quality available while maintaining a frame rate more than double the playability threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, delivering 94 FPS average, which provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: High is the most demanding preset that remains playable, with an average of 66 FPS. While this clears the 60 FPS threshold, it does so with only a 6 FPS margin, meaning users should expect occasional dips below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The Medium preset offers more headroom at 79 FPS average, but High provides better visual fidelity while still technically meeting the playability requirement.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo averages 51 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest playable preset at 4K is High, which averages 66 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 2560x1440?
A: Ultra is the best setting at 2560x1440, providing an average of 94 FPS. This is the most demanding preset while still maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35,802) and 0.5% higher than both the Intel Core 7 250H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (35,728 and 35,719 respectively).
Q: Is the GPU more important than the CPU for this game?
A: Yes, the data suggests the GPU is the primary performance driver. At 3840x2160, lowering settings from Ultra to Low increases average FPS from 51 to 103, a 52 FPS gain. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient for Minimum, as even at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 297 FPS.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1920x1080 Medium?
A: The minimum FPS at 1920x1080 Medium is 193, with a maximum of 262 and an average of 228. This indicates very consistent frame delivery.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 786th out of 3,712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 21% of all tested hardware pairings for Minimum.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 can absolutely run Minimum, and do so with exceptional performance. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 146 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra averaging 94 FPS. At 3840x2160, the combo can run High settings at an average of 66 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, although Ultra falls short at 51 FPS. The verdict is clear: this is a powerful combination for Minimum, capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and remaining playable at 4K with High settings. The 8-core CPU and 12 GB GPU provide ample headroom for this 2014 title, ensuring a smooth experience across all standard gaming resolutions.