Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 79 | 95 | 124 |
| 1440p QHD | 112 | 148 | 176 | 230 |
| 1080p Full HD | 174 | 229 | 273 | 356 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a dominant performance profile for Minimum, a third-person shooter released on 2014-06-25. Benchmark data, measured rather than estimated, shows this combination exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The hardware demonstrates exceptional headroom, with the most demanding settings at 4K still clearing the playability bar, while lower resolutions produce frame rates that approach or exceed the refresh rate limits of typical high-refresh displays.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which produces an average frame rate of 61 FPS. This is a marginal clearance of the playable threshold, with only 1 FPS of headroom, indicating that 4K Ultra is technically playable but leaves little buffer for scene complexity spikes. The data shows High settings at this resolution deliver 79 FPS average, offering a more comfortable margin while still maintaining high visual fidelity.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 112 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is substantial, representing an 84% performance increase at the same Ultra settings. This resolution proves to be the sweet spot for this hardware, combining high visual quality with frame rates well above what is needed for smooth gameplay.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings reach 174 FPS average, which is nearly three times the playable threshold. The performance hierarchy across resolutions is consistent: the RTX 4080 paired with the Ryzen 7 7700 has sufficient compute to push even the heaviest preset to high frame rates at 1080p. Medium settings at 1080p reach 273 FPS, while Low settings peak at 356 FPS, showing the scaling potential when visual fidelity is reduced.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario across all resolutions, but the degree of GPU dominance shifts significantly with resolution. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 182 FPS (356 to 174), indicating that the graphics card has substantial headroom even at lower resolutions. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, provides sufficient single-thread performance to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 4080 at 1080p.
Moving to 2560x1440, the spread between Low (230 FPS) and Ultra (112 FPS) narrows to 118 FPS. This compression suggests that as resolution increases, the GPU's pixel throughput becomes more critical while the CPU's role in feeding draw calls becomes relatively less impactful. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum of 149 FPS and maximum of 202 FPS, demonstrating frame time consistency that indicates neither component is creating stutter or bottleneck conditions.
At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes most pronounced. Low settings drop to 124 FPS, while Ultra falls to 61 FPS — a 63 FPS spread. The 4K resolution places the heaviest load on the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 9728 shading units. The data shows that between 1440p and 4K at Ultra settings, performance drops by 51 FPS (112 to 61), which is a 46% reduction. This indicates the GPU is the primary determinant of performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU's 3.80 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost clocks remain sufficient across all tested configurations.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 246th out of 3712 tested combos in this game, placing it in the top 6.6% of all configurations in the database. This percentile position is consistent with the component-level rankings: the CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards.
The combo rank reflects the synergy between these two components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40081 and the GPU's average of 54247 combine to produce frame rates that are substantially higher than the median tested configuration. The ranking suggests that this combo outperforms approximately 93.4% of all recorded systems in Minimum, which is notable for a game released in 2014 that may not fully utilize the multi-threading capabilities of a 16-thread processor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals show remarkably close aggregate scores, indicating that the Ryzen 7 7700 sits in a tightly contested performance band. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313 (0.6% lower). These delta percentages are negligible for gaming performance, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match with a score of 54209 (0.1% higher), which is effectively a performance parity. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% higher), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% higher) and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% higher). These deltas suggest that swapping to any of these GPUs would result in frame rate differences of less than 3%, which is well within run-to-run variance for most games.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a complete frame rate hierarchy across all four presets. Low settings produce 356 FPS average, Medium settings yield 273 FPS with a minimum of 232 FPS and maximum of 313 FPS, High settings reach 229 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 174 FPS. The Medium preset's min/max range of 81 FPS indicates some frame time variance, but even the minimum exceeds the playable threshold by 172 FPS.
For 2560x1440, the measured results show Low at 230 FPS, Medium at 176 FPS (minimum 149 FPS, maximum 202 FPS), High at 148 FPS, and Ultra at 112 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 51% reduction in average frame rate, demonstrating the performance cost of higher graphical fidelity at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates compress significantly. Low settings average 124 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS (minimum 80 FPS, maximum 109 FPS), High averages 79 FPS, and Ultra averages 61 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 80 FPS is particularly notable — even the worst-case frame time at 4K Medium remains well above the playable threshold. The Ultra preset's 61 FPS average is the only configuration that approaches the 60 FPS boundary, but it does not cross it.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes, the data shows Ultra settings at 3840x2160 produce an average of 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, the margin is minimal, so players seeking consistent performance may prefer High settings at 79 FPS for additional headroom.
Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Minimum?
A: The benchmark data indicates 2560x1440 at Ultra settings delivers 112 FPS average, offering the best balance of visual quality and performance. This represents an 84% improvement over 4K Ultra while still maintaining high graphical fidelity.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?
A: This combination ranks 246th out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.6% of all systems in the database. Both the CPU and GPU sit in the 86-87th percentile among their respective component categories.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 the bottleneck at any resolution?
A: The frame rate scaling across resolutions suggests the GPU is the primary performance determinant. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 1049 in 3DMark allow it to feed the RTX 4080 adequately at all tested settings.
Q: What GPU alternatives would provide similar performance?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match with a benchmark score 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (1.1% higher), RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (2.6% higher), and Radeon 8060S (2.7% higher) would all yield nearly identical frame rates within run-to-run variance.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured data shows 273 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 232 FPS and maximum of 313 FPS. This configuration provides substantial performance headroom for high refresh rate displays.
The Verdict
This PC configuration unequivocally runs Minimum at playable frame rates across all tested scenarios. The verdict by resolution confirms that every resolution and preset combination clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Ultra at 61 FPS average, with all four presets — Low (124 FPS), Medium (95 FPS), High (79 FPS), and Ultra (61 FPS) — exceeding the playability bar. The 2560x1440 resolution shows even greater headroom, with Ultra reaching 112 FPS and all settings maintaining frame rates above 148 FPS. At 1920x1080, performance is exceptional, with Ultra at 174 FPS and Low at 356 FPS. The data demonstrates that this combo is not merely capable of running the game, but does so with enough performance margin to support high-refresh displays and demanding visual configurations. The only consideration is 4K Ultra's slim 1 FPS buffer above the threshold, which could occasionally dip below 60 FPS during heavy scenes, but every other configuration provides substantial safety margin. This system ranks in the top 6.6% of tested combos, confirming its position as a high-performance pairing for this title.