Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 44 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 68 | 81 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 106 | 126 | 165 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
# AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + Intel Arc B580: Minimum Performance Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B580 pairing presents a fascinating case study in mid-range PC gaming performance. This combination represents a modern, multi-generation leap in architecture for both CPU and GPU, targeting high-refresh-rate 1440p and smooth 4K experiences in Minimum. The data reveals a system that is capable, but one where the CPU and GPU roles shift dramatically depending on resolution and preset.
Similar Performance Alternatives
When examining what nearby hardware would deliver comparable experiences, the data points to several interesting candidates. The CPU's closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, posts a nearly identical average benchmark score (40048 vs. our 40081, a mere 0.1% difference). This suggests that for CPU-bound tasks, users would see virtually indistinguishable performance. The Intel Core 5 221E is similarly close, with an average score of 40144, sitting just 0.2% below our chip. These negligible deltas mean that in CPU-heavy scenes at lower resolutions, the choice between these processors would come down to platform features rather than raw throughput.
On the GPU side, the data becomes more interesting due to the variance between vendors. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP is the nearest rival at -0.2% (23061 avg vs. our 23021). This is a much older architecture, yet it lands almost exactly on the Arc B580's average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 are also close, at +0.6% and -0.7% respectively, indicating a cluster of GPUs around this performance tier. The NVIDIA P106-100 is the last of the near group, at -1%. This tells us the B580 competes in a well-populated GPU segment where generational leaps in NVIDIA cards (20-series to 30-series) have not massively disrupted the average.
CPU and GPU Roles
The dynamic in Minimum is split cleanly between CPU and GPU, but the line shifts depending on target resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU holds a commanding lead. At Low settings, the CPU is practically the only component working, producing 165 FPS. This is a scenario where the Ryzen 7 7700's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi: 18760) and high memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) let the game fly. But as we move to Medium, FPS drops to 126 (min 107, max 145), still far above the 60 FPS threshold, and the CPU remains the primary driver. It is only at Ultra settings that the GPU begins to show its part: FPS settles to 81, a figure that is still 35% above the playable threshold. The B580's relatively modest compute and shading power does not need to flex much here.
At 2560x1440, the balance tips. The CPU still pushes the average to 106 FPS at Low, and 68 FPS at High. However, this is the first resolution where the GPU starts dictating terms at Medium, where the average sits at 81 FPS with a floor of 69 FPS and a ceiling of 93. The B580's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) are enough for Medium, but the 2,560 shading units and 20 RT cores are the limiting factor at High where the GPU's work is visible. The CPU scaling is also clear: 3dmark single-thread and multi-thread scores (1049 and 8484) show the 7700's headroom over the 13905H, but the GPU is the wall at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the story inverts. The CPU is no longer the show. At Low, the B580 can manage 57 FPS — a solidly playable result. Medium drops to 44 avg (min 37, max 50), and High is 28. The 4K resolution is purely GPU-bound; the B580's 456 GB/s bandwidth and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are ordinary for this class, and it shows. This is a 4K-capable card, but it is not a 4K comfortable card when pitted against the CPU's relative strength at 1080p.
The data asks an interesting question: at 1080p High, the CPU is still doing the heavy lifting. At 1440p Medium, the GPU starts to bargain. At 4K Low, the GPU is alone. The CPU's task is essentially done above 1440p, and the GPU becomes the sole determinant.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data offers a detailed picture across settings and resolutions. We see a clear pattern: the better the visual quality, the lower the framerate, but the shape of that curve changes with resolution.
1920x1080: This is the sweet spot. The CPU keeps the game at 165 FPS on Low. This is an outlier `min` and `max` can swing widely (and no data point for min/max given). Medium is a highly playable 126 FPS (min 107, max 145). High drops to 106 avg. Ultra is the first "stress" setting at 81 FPS, still 35% above the 60 FPS threshold. The spread is wide: 74 FPS between Low and Ultra.
2560x1440: Here the curve is steeper. Low pushes to 106 FPS, and High is at 68. The Medium setting is interesting because it shows a min of 69 and max of 93, meaning the game is not a locked 60 at this setting; it has headroom but is not GPU-limited. Ultra is 52 FPS. The High setting is the only one at this resolution that is GPU-heavy.
3840x2160: This is where the card must be honest. Low gives 57 FPS, which is a passing score, but not by much. Medium gives 44 avg (min 37, max 50), and High sits at 28. The 4K numbers show a GPU that is not out of breath, but is definitely not at its happy place. The 456 GB/s bandwidth and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate read as a card that was designed for 1440p gameplay, and can do 4K on modest settings.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Minimum? The answer is nuanced but ultimately positive. At 1920x1080, yes, with all settings. The 7700's strong single-thread (1049) and multi-thread (1683) scores support the CPU's ability to maintain 165 FPS at Low, and still stay above 60 at Ultra (81 FPS). This is a definitive yes at 1080p. The Ultra result of 81 FPS is the standout number — it shows the combination is stronger at 1080p than many would expect, and it is 35% above the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440, the data says yes, but with a caveat. The High preset (68 FPS) clears the 60 FPS threshold, and Medium (81 FPS) does as well. The 1440p verdict: playable on High and Medium, with Medium offering a 35% FPS buffer over the playable floor. Low is even better at 106.
At 3840x2160, the system hits a wall. The verdict is No for Ultra (28 FPS) and Low (57 FPS) is not enough. Medium (44 FPS) is also below the line. The B580 cannot hold 60 FPS at 4K) on any preset. This is a card for 1440p and 1080p high-refresh high, not a 4K60 card for this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
Given the data, the most demanding preset that still holds 60 FPS is as follows:
- 1920x1080: Ultra — 81 FPS average. This is the peak experience, and the data says the card has headroom to spare.
- 2560x1440: High — 68 FPS average. This is the highest preset that stays above 60 with a comfortable margin.
- 3840x2160: No preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 57 FPS, but it falls short. Do not use 4K with this hardware.
How This Combo Ranks
This combo ranks #2790 out of 3712 tested combinations. The data suggests this is a top-25% pairing. In a game like Minimum, which is a third-person shooter, the combination of the 7700's powerful x86 cores and the B580's architectural efficiencies in DX11/DX12 is extremely competitive. The CPU's 3dmark 16-thread score of 8484 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 indicate they are well-matched in the 1080p and 1440p arenas. The 1440p High result, the 1080p Ultra result, are the two killer numbers. The 4K data is the proof this is not a 4K-capable pairing for Minimum, but it is an excellent 1440p high-refresh pairing.
FAQ
Q: Can AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + Intel Arc B580 run Minimum at 1920x1080 Ultra?
A: Yes. The measured average is 81 FPS, which is 35% above the 60 FPS threshold. The GPU is not the bottleneck here; the CPU's strong single-thread (1049) and multi-thread (1683) scores carry it.
Q: What about 2560x1440?
A: Yes, on High. The average is 68 FPS. It's a 13% margin above 60. Medium also works at 81 FPS (min 69, max 93). Ultra drops to 52 FPS, just below the line.
Q: Can it do 3840x2160?
A: No. The best is Low at 57 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target by 5%. The Medium (44 FPS) and High (28 FPS) are not playable. The data suggests this card is not designed for 4K at 60 FPS in this game.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B580 a good pairing for the Ryzen 7 7700?
A: The benchmark data says yes for 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU's lead over the nearest rivals (AMD RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA RTX 2080, RTX 3080) is effectively zero. The combo's CPU strength shows at lower resolutions; the 7700's 24-thread data at 1080p Low (165 FPS) and the 1440p Low (106 FPS) shows the CPU is the primary driver. At 4K, the GPU becomes the sole limit, and it's just short of the 60 FPS goal.