Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
82 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
40 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
25 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
27 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
16 FPS
17.9ms Frame Time
27ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 40,081
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 28,766

Recommendations

Optimize Settings

Try lowering shadows and anti-aliasing for better FPS.

GPU Upgrade

A better graphics card would significantly improve performance.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 16 19 22 27
1440p QHD 25 35 38 55
1080p Full HD 40 56 65 82

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 56
1920x1080 Low 82
1920x1080 Medium 65
1920x1080 Ultra 40
2560x1440 High 35
2560x1440 Low 55
2560x1440 Medium 38
2560x1440 Ultra 25
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Low 27
3840x2160 Medium 22
3840x2160 Ultra 16

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 sits in a tightly contested performance band. The database shows its average benchmark score at 40,081, which places it within 0.6% of several nearby processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40,048, a mere 0.1% behind, making it effectively identical in overall compute performance. The Intel Core 5 221E is 0.2% ahead at 40,144, while the AMD Ryzen 9 270 leads by 0.4% with 40,246. The Intel Core i9-13905H tops this immediate group at 40,313, 0.6% above the Ryzen 7 7700. For a builder considering the Ryzen 7 7700, any of these four chips would deliver indistinguishable application performance in most real-world scenarios, assuming platform compatibility is not a concern.

On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon RX 570 posts an average benchmark score of 28,766. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, scores 28,874, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M295X trails by 0.7% at 28,580, while the AMD Radeon RX 470 sits 0.8% ahead at 28,996. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is 1.2% behind at 28,421. The RX 570 and RX 470 are particularly close, unsurprising given their shared architectural lineage. The RX 6800M being in this band is notable; despite being a mobile part, its aggregate benchmark score lands within a rounding error of the RX 570. In practice, the RX 570's nearest rivals would behave nearly identically in a game like Minimum, meaning users upgrading from any of these cards should expect similar frame rates before considering other system changes.

CPU and GPU Roles

For this pairing, the recorded measurements show a clear pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution and preset combination. The Ryzen 7 7700, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has ample headroom in single-thread and multithread workloads, as indicated by its 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The RX 570, by contrast, sits at the 74th percentile among GPUs, and the frame rate data reflects that gap.

Looking at the scaling from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop sharply. At High settings, the system falls from 56 FPS at 1080p to 34.7 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 38%. At Low settings, the drop is from 82.2 FPS to 55.4 FPS, a 33% decline. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at High settings, the frame rate collapses from 34.7 FPS to 19.1 FPS, another 45% loss. This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-bound configuration: the CPU is not changing between these runs, so the entire performance delta comes from the graphics card's inability to feed pixels fast enough at higher resolutions.

The preset scaling reinforces this. At 1920x1080, moving from Low to Medium costs 17.2 FPS (82.2 to 65), and from Medium to High costs another 9 FPS (65 to 56). At 3840x2160, the same preset progression yields 27, 21.8, 19.1, and 16.2 FPS for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra respectively. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 10.8 FPS, showing that the GPU is saturated even at the lowest settings. The CPU's role here is minimal; a weaker processor would likely produce similar results at 4K, while at 1080p the data suggests the RX 570 is still the bottleneck given the steep preset scaling.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 7700 and RX 570 ranks 3,510 out of 3,712 tested combos in Minimum. That places it in the bottom 5.4% of all configurations in the database. This low rank is driven almost entirely by the GPU. The Ryzen 7 7700 is a high-end modern processor, but the RX 570 is an end-of-life graphics card from 2017, and the benchmark results reflect this mismatch.

In practical terms, this combo performs well below the median tested system. The rank indicates that the vast majority of pairings tested by the database deliver higher average frame rates in Minimum. The data shows no resolution or preset where this combo reaches the upper half of tested configurations. The 3,510th position out of 3,712 means only 202 tested combos performed worse. This is not a configuration that will impress in aggregate rankings, though the specific playability picture at 1080p is more nuanced, as the verdict section will detail.

The Verdict

The recorded data answers the core question directly. At 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches 60 FPS. The best average at 4K is 27 FPS on Low, which is less than half of the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 2560x1440, the situation improves but still falls short. The best average at 1440p is 55.4 FPS on Low, just under the 60 FPS line. No preset at 1440p is marked as playable in the database.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low and Medium presets. Low averages 82.2 FPS, and Medium averages 65 FPS. Both are above 60. High settings drop to 56 FPS, which misses the threshold, and Ultra falls to 40.1 FPS. The database designates Low and Medium as playable at 1080p, with Medium being the best playable setting at 65 FPS average. For a user targeting 60 FPS, the answer is yes, this PC can run Minimum, but only at 1080p and only with settings at Medium or below. At 1440p and 4K, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at any preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains measured average frame rates for twelve combinations of resolution and settings. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not recorded for any configuration, so the analysis relies on averages.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows. Low settings produce 27 FPS average. Medium produces 21.8 FPS. High produces 19.1 FPS. Ultra produces 16.2 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra costs 10.8 FPS, and even the best case at 4K is far below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the averages are higher but still constrained. Low settings deliver 55.4 FPS, which is the closest any 1440p preset comes to 60. Medium delivers 37.7 FPS. High delivers 34.7 FPS. Ultra delivers 25.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 17.7 FPS, the largest preset-to-preset jump in this resolution class.

At 1920x1080, the system performs best. Low settings average 82.2 FPS, the highest recorded figure for this combo. Medium averages 65 FPS, still above the playability threshold. High averages 56 FPS, just below 60. Ultra averages 40.1 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 42.1 FPS, showing that the preset choice has a massive impact on playability at this resolution. The data indicates that Medium is the optimal playable setting, offering a 65 FPS average while maintaining higher visual quality than Low.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate is 27 FPS on Low settings. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 21.8, 19.1, and 16.2 FPS respectively. No 4K preset is marked as playable in the database.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1080p for this combo?

A: Medium is the best playable setting at 1920x1080, with an average of 65 FPS. Low also clears 60 FPS at 82.2 FPS average, but Medium offers higher visual quality while staying above the threshold. High and Ultra fall to 56 and 40.1 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the RX 570 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 570 has an average benchmark score of 28,766. The AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 0.4% ahead at 28,874, the AMD Radeon R9 M295X is 0.7% behind at 28,580, the AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.8% ahead at 28,996, and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is 1.2% behind at 28,421. These deltas are small enough that real-world gaming differences would be minimal.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system for Minimum?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 7700 ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 570 ranks in the 74th percentile among GPUs. Frame rate scaling across resolutions shows steep drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance.

Q: What is this combo's overall rank among tested systems in Minimum?

A: The combination ranks 3,510 out of 3,712 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 5.4% of all configurations in the database for this game.

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1440p?

A: No. At 2560x1440, the best average is 55.4 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 37.7, 34.7, and 25.3 FPS respectively. No 1440p preset is marked as playable.