Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 75 | 89 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 106 | 139 | 166 | 216 |
| 1080p Full HD | 164 | 215 | 257 | 335 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti combination delivers a performance profile that is decisively above the playability threshold for Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The data confirms that this pairing is not merely capable, but overwhelmingly so, with benchmark results indicating that the system will handle the game with substantial headroom at nearly every setting. Across all tested resolutions, from 1080p to 4K, the measured frame rates establish this combo as a high-end performer that will likely leave users seeking more demanding titles or higher refresh rate displays.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear and consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system produces extraordinary frame rates that are far beyond the needs of any standard display. With Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 335 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 257 FPS, with a minimum of 218 FPS and a maximum of 295 FPS. High settings produce an average of 215 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a robust 164 FPS average. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the GPU is rarely the limiting factor, and the frame rates are more than sufficient for even the fastest high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high, though the scaling between presets becomes more pronounced. Low settings deliver an average of 216 FPS, which is a minimal drop from the 1080p result. The Medium preset averages 166 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 141 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS. High settings produce an average of 139 FPS, and the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration, still achieves a strong 106 FPS average. The data shows that even at this higher resolution, the system easily clears the 60 FPS threshold with the most demanding settings, leaving considerable performance in reserve.
The 4K results at 3840x2160 are where the system begins to show some strain, though it remains highly playable. At Low settings, the average frame rate is 116 FPS, which is still a very smooth experience. The Medium preset averages 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS, demonstrating consistent frame pacing. High settings lower the average to 75 FPS, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Ultra preset, however, is the first configuration to fall below the threshold, with an average of 57 FPS. This is the only tested setting where the system does not maintain a 60 FPS average, marking the boundary of its performance envelope.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data indicates that for each resolution, the system can handle a specific maximum preset while maintaining an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays above the threshold is Ultra, which achieves an average of 164 FPS. This is a significant margin over the playability threshold, suggesting that users can enable all visual enhancements without concern for performance.
At 2560x1440, the best settings that maintain a 60 FPS average are also Ultra, with a measured average of 106 FPS. This result shows that the system is well-balanced for this resolution, as the most demanding preset still provides a frame rate that is nearly double the playability threshold. The performance at this resolution is strong enough that users could even consider enabling additional features, such as higher-quality shadows or anti-aliasing, without dropping below the target.
For 3840x2160, the analysis changes. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 75 FPS. This provides a 15 FPS buffer over the threshold, which is adequate for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset falls short, with an average of 57 FPS, just below the playable threshold. As such, users seeking a 4K experience should stick to High settings to ensure a consistently smooth frame rate, or they may need to accept the minor compromise of the Ultra preset's slightly sub-60 FPS average.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a complex interplay between the CPU and GPU across different resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the extremely high frame rates, particularly at Low and Medium settings, suggest that the CPU is playing a more significant role in determining performance. The Ryzen 7 5800XT, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is well-equipped for this task, and the data shows that the system is capable of pushing frame rates well beyond 200 FPS at this resolution. The minimal difference between the Low and High presets at 1080p, from 335 FPS to 215 FPS, indicates that the GPU is not the primary bottleneck at these settings.
As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more prominent. The frame rates at this resolution are still very high, but the scaling between presets is more pronounced, with the Ultra preset dropping to 106 FPS from the Low preset's 216 FPS. This suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti is becoming the limiting factor as the pixel count increases, though the CPU still has enough headroom to avoid being a bottleneck at these frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The frame rates drop significantly across all presets, with the Ultra preset falling below the 60 FPS threshold. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K, from 116 FPS to 57 FPS, is substantial, indicating that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint. The CPU's role is diminished at this resolution, as the system is no longer able to generate frame rates high enough to expose any potential CPU limitations. The data shows a clear shift in bottleneck from the CPU at lower resolutions to the GPU at higher resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rival data, the Ryzen 7 5800XT sits in a performance class with several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H has an average score of 29868, which is a 0% delta from the 5800XT's average of 29879. This indicates that these two CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in this game. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both have an average score of 29955, representing a -0.3% delta, meaning they are fractionally slower. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with an average score of 29713, shows a 0.6% delta, making it slightly faster. In practice, any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 5070 Ti would yield very similar frame rates in Minimum, as the performance differences are within a fraction of a percent.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals present an interesting comparison. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has an average score of 50001, a -0.1% delta from the RTX 5070 Ti's 49957, making them effectively performance equals. The Intel Arc A550M, with a score of 49737, shows a 0.4% delta, indicating it is slightly slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is faster, with a score of 50951 and a -2% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is slower, with a score of 48477 and a 3.1% delta. For this game, a system with an RX Vega 64 or Arc A550M would behave almost identically to the RTX 5070 Ti, while an RX 6900 XT would offer a modest performance improvement and an RX 6800 XT would be slightly less capable.
The Verdict
The verdict is unequivocal: this PC can run Minimum exceptionally well. The data shows that at 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra maintains an average frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest recorded average being 164 FPS at Ultra settings. This means users can enable all visual features and still enjoy a buttery-smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the system also clears the threshold with every preset, with the Ultra settings averaging 106 FPS. This provides a high-fidelity experience at a popular gaming resolution without any performance compromises.
At 3840x2160, the system is still highly capable, but users must make a choice. The High preset delivers an average of 75 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a great 4K experience. The Ultra preset, however, falls just short with an average of 57 FPS. This is a minor miss, and users may find the experience acceptable depending on their sensitivity to frame rate fluctuations. Overall, the system is a strong performer for Minimum, with the only caveat being the Ultra preset at 4K, which is a marginal miss of the playability threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti combination ranks 403rd out of 3712 tested combos for this game. This places the system in the top 11% of all tested configurations, a strong showing that reflects its high-end components. The percentile rankings of the individual parts support this position, with the CPU at the 81st percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The high rank indicates that this combo is significantly more capable than the vast majority of systems tested for Minimum, and it is well-positioned to handle the game's demands with ease. The data confirms that this is a high-tier configuration that will provide an excellent experience for most users, with the only limitation being the Ultra preset at 4K.