Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 45 | 56 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 70 | 89 | 104 | 137 |
| 1080p Full HD | 107 | 138 | 166 | 216 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a wide performance spread across the three tested resolutions in Minimum, with the data showing a clear pattern: 1080p is thoroughly dominated, 1440p offers a comfortable margin at maximum settings, and 4K requires a significant settings reduction to maintain playability. The measured frame rates indicate this combination is heavily influenced by resolution scaling, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of 75.3 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 56.2 FPS, falling below the playable threshold, while High (45.4 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) are progressively further from playable. This makes Low the only viable 4K option for a smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, the situation reverses dramatically. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 69.9 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS bar with a modest 9.9 FPS headroom. High (88.5 FPS), Medium (103.5 FPS), and Low (137.4 FPS) all exceed the threshold by substantial margins, but Ultra is the recommended choice since it delivers the highest visual quality while remaining playable.
At 1920x1080, every preset is far above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset leads with an average of 106.6 FPS, while High (137.7 FPS), Medium (166.1 FPS), and Low (216 FPS) all provide even greater headroom. For the best visual experience, Ultra is the clear pick, offering nearly double the playable threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a stark shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 1080p, the CPU’s role is prominent: the gap between Low (216 FPS) and Ultra (106.6 FPS) is 109.4 FPS, a 50.6% reduction in frame rate purely from settings changes. This suggests the Ryzen 7 5800XT’s 8-core, 16-thread design (with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz) is capable of feeding the RTX 5060 enough data to reach very high frame rates, but the GPU’s workload at Ultra settings becomes the limiting factor.
Moving to 1440p, the scaling pattern shifts. The difference between Low (137.4 FPS) and Ultra (69.9 FPS) is 67.5 FPS, a smaller absolute gap but a similar proportional drop (49.2%). The average frame rate at Low drops from 216 FPS at 1080p to 137.4 FPS at 1440p, a 36.4% reduction, indicating that resolution is now exerting more influence on performance. The GPU’s pixel throughput (rated at 119.9 GPixel/s) and memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s) are being taxed more heavily.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Ultra preset falls to 35 FPS, a 67.2% drop from the 1080p Ultra figure (106.6 FPS). Even Low settings at 4K (75.3 FPS) are slower than Ultra at 1440p (69.9 FPS is the only comparable data point, but the 4K Low figure is only 5.4 FPS higher). The RTX 5060’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus appears to be a limiting factor at this resolution, as the settings scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K produces a 40.3 FPS spread (from 75.3 to 35), which is the largest absolute drop across all resolutions. The CPU’s influence wanes here, as even the highest single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359) cannot compensate for the GPU’s pixel rendering limits.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160:
- Low: avg 75.3 FPS
- Medium: avg 56.2 FPS
- High: avg 45.4 FPS
- Ultra: avg 35 FPS
The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent degradation: each step up in settings costs roughly 19-20 FPS on average. The step from Low to Medium is the largest single drop (19.1 FPS), while the Medium to High step (10.8 FPS) and High to Ultra step (10.4 FPS) are more moderate. This suggests the Low preset is the only one that comfortably avoids the GPU’s performance cliff at this resolution.
2560x1440:
- Low: avg 137.4 FPS
- Medium: avg 103.5 FPS
- High: avg 88.5 FPS
- Ultra: avg 69.9 FPS
At 1440p, the settings scaling is more linear. The Low to Medium drop is 33.9 FPS, Medium to High is 15 FPS, and High to Ultra is 18.6 FPS. The average frame rate at Ultra (69.9 FPS) is still 9.9 FPS above the playable threshold, indicating that the RTX 5060 has enough headroom for maximum settings at this resolution.
1920x1080:
- Low: avg 216 FPS
- Medium: avg 166.1 FPS
- High: avg 137.7 FPS
- Ultra: avg 106.6 FPS
The 1080p results show the largest absolute frame rates in the entire dataset. The Low preset approaches the 240 Hz territory, while Ultra remains well above 100 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 109.4 FPS reduction, but every preset is playable by a wide margin. The step from Low to Medium (49.9 FPS) is the most punishing, while Medium to High (28.4 FPS) and High to Ultra (31.1 FPS) are less severe.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1683 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the 54.6th percentile of all configurations, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of tested systems. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing: the CPU’s 81st percentile standing among all processors (with an average benchmark score of 29879) is notably higher than the GPU’s 72nd percentile (average benchmark score of 26331). This suggests the Ryzen 7 5800XT has more headroom than the RTX 5060 can fully utilize, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU’s 3DMark multi-threaded scores (7683 for 16 threads, 7680 for max threads) are less likely to bottleneck.
The combo’s mid-pack ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data. At 1080p, it delivers frame rates that would satisfy most gamers, but at 4K, the performance drops below the playable threshold for all but the lowest settings. The ranking indicates that while this is not a top-tier configuration for Minimum, it is far from the bottom, with 2029 tested combos ranking below it.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals for each component, several alternative configurations would likely produce similar frame rates in Minimum.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29868, a 0% delta from the Ryzen 7 5800XT’s score. This mobile processor would behave nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, a -0.3% delta, meaning they are marginally slower (by about 87 points). The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, a 0.6% delta, indicating it is slightly faster (by about 166 points). Any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 5060 would yield frame rates within a few percentage points of the tested configuration.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, a -0.3% delta from the RTX 5060’s 26331. This integrated GPU is surprisingly close in synthetic benchmarks, though real-world gaming performance may differ. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (-0.3% delta), while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (-0.8% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, a 1.2% delta, meaning the RTX 5060 is slightly faster. Swapping the RTX 5060 for any of these would produce similar FPS figures, with the RX 6750 XT being the closest match in terms of raw performance.
A full alternative combo could pair the Ryzen 7 5800XT with an RX 6750 XT, which would likely produce nearly identical results given the 1.2% GPU score delta. Alternatively, pairing a Ryzen 7 7840HS with the RTX 5060 would maintain similar CPU performance while keeping the same GPU.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with playable frame rates?*
A: Only at Low settings, which produce an average of 75.3 FPS. Medium (56.2 FPS), High (45.4 FPS), and Ultra (35 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p?
A: Ultra, which achieves an average of 69.9 FPS. This is the highest quality preset that remains above 60 FPS at this resolution.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate drops from 106.6 FPS at 1080p to 35 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 71.6 FPS or 67.2%.
Q: Which component is more important at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU has more influence at 1080p, as the frame rate at Low (216 FPS) is far above what the GPU can sustain at higher settings, indicating the RTX 5060 becomes the bottleneck when settings are increased.
Q: Is the RTX 5060 a bottleneck for the Ryzen 7 5800XT in this game?
A: At 4K, yes. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking (average score 26331) is lower than the CPU’s 81st percentile (average score 29879), and the large FPS drops at higher settings and resolutions point to GPU limitations.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: It ranks 1683 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the upper half of all tested systems.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Minimum at playable frame rates, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 106.6 FPS and Low reaching 216 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra at 69.9 FPS providing the best visual experience. At 3840x2160, only Low settings (75.3 FPS) maintain playability; Medium (56.2 FPS), High (45.4 FPS), and Ultra (35 FPS) all fall short.
The data indicates that this configuration is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, where the RTX 5060’s performance is sufficient for maximum settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and users must compromise on visual quality to maintain smooth frame rates. The combo’s mid-pack ranking (1683 of 3712) underscores that while it is not a top-tier setup, it delivers solid performance for the majority of gaming scenarios in Minimum.