Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a robust performance profile for Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014. Benchmark data shows this combination handles the game with considerable headroom across most settings and resolutions, with the primary limitation appearing only at 4K with the Ultra preset. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares the hardware to its nearest alternatives, and provides specific guidance on optimal settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this combo each have closely matched rivals that would produce near-identical in-game results. For the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, the nearest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, which scores an average of 24728 in synthetic benchmarks—a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-12450HX and Intel Core i5-11600 are also within a fraction of a percent, with deltas of 0.5% and 0.6% respectively. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX trails by 0.5%. Given these margins, any of these processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Minimum, as the game is not likely to be CPU-bound at the tested settings.

On the graphics side, the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in a tight cluster of comparable GPUs. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is essentially a tie, with a delta of -0.1%, while the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile matches that same -0.1% difference. The Quadro M6000 (non-24GB version) is 0.2% behind, and the RTX 4090 Mobile is 1% lower in average benchmark score. This suggests that swapping the RTX 4070 SUPER for any of these alternatives would result in nearly identical FPS figures—well within measurement error—meaning the overall gaming experience would be unchanged.

Because both components have such close rivals, users upgrading from one of these near-identical parts to another would see no meaningful performance shift in Minimum. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicate both are strong performers, but their specific positions within the benchmark hierarchy are what matter for this game.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset delivers an average of 67.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 54.7 FPS, which is below playable thresholds, so High is the maximum playable setting at 4K.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p with the Ultra preset?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 101.2 FPS, providing a substantial 41.2 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS target. This makes 1440p Ultra a comfortable choice for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Is the game playable at 1080p on all settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, even the most demanding Ultra preset reaches 149.5 FPS average, while Low, Medium, and High produce 307.9, 237.3, and 199.4 FPS respectively. Every preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 4K?

A: The gap is substantial. Low settings at 3840x2160 yield 105.7 FPS, while Ultra drops to 54.7 FPS—a difference of 51 FPS. Medium sits between at 80.9 FPS, and High is close behind at 67.2 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested hardware configurations?

A: This specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 681st out of 3712 total combinations tested for Minimum, placing it in the top 18.4% of all systems in the database.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: Benchmark data shows the CPU is never the limiting factor. At 1080p, the GPU produces 307.9 FPS on Low settings, and the CPU's multi-threaded score of 22366 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed the GPU adequately. The consistent scaling from 1080p to 4K suggests GPU-bound performance throughout.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality presets, revealing a clear performance hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 307.9 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the dataset. Moving up through Medium and High yields 237.3 and 199.4 FPS respectively, while Ultra still maintains a very high 149.5 FPS. These numbers indicate the RTX 4070 SUPER is barely taxed at 1080p, with even the hardest preset leaving more than double the 60 FPS requirement.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down proportionally but remains excellent. Low settings produce 196.6 FPS, Medium drops to 154.1, and High reaches 125.4. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration, still delivers 101.2 FPS—comfortably above the playable threshold and suitable for smooth high-refresh gaming.

The 3840x2160 results show the first signs of strain. Low settings manage 105.7 FPS, Medium follows with 80.9, and High drops to 67.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 54.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. This is the only instance across all tested combinations where the system fails to meet the playability criterion. The progression from 1080p Ultra (149.5 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (101.2 FPS) to 4K Ultra (54.7 FPS) shows a consistent 32-35% drop per resolution step, which is typical for GPU-bound workloads.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher in nearly every scenario. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the threshold, with the lowest performer (Ultra at 149.5 FPS) providing over 89 FPS of headroom. The 2560x1440 resolution is equally capable, as even the Ultra preset averages 101.2 FPS, leaving a 41.2 FPS buffer. For 3840x2160, the High preset achieves 67.2 FPS and is the best playable option, while Low and Medium also pass at 105.7 and 80.9 FPS respectively. The only configuration that fails is 4K Ultra at 54.7 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold by 5.3 FPS.

For users targeting 60 FPS as the minimum acceptable performance, the system offers complete flexibility at 1080p and 1440p, allowing any preset without compromise. At 4K, users must avoid the Ultra preset but can otherwise choose freely. The data confirms the hardware is well-matched to this game, with the GPU serving as the primary performance driver across all resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which averages 67.2 FPS. This provides a modest 7.2 FPS margin, so users who prefer visual fidelity over headroom can select High, but should monitor for dips below 60 FPS in heavy scenes. Medium is a safer alternative at 80.9 FPS, and Low reaches 105.7 FPS for maximum smoothness.

For 2560x1440, Ultra is the best choice, delivering 101.2 FPS. This preset includes the highest quality textures, shadows, and effects while still maintaining a 41.2 FPS buffer above the playable threshold. Users with 144Hz monitors can comfortably run Ultra and expect near-maximum refresh rates in most situations.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is again the optimal preset, with an average of 149.5 FPS. This means the system can drive high-refresh 144Hz or even 165Hz displays at maximum settings. The 89.5 FPS margin over the 60 FPS threshold provides ample headroom for any transient performance dips, and the 307.9 FPS Low setting exists for users with 240Hz+ monitors seeking maximum frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

This AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and RTX 4070 SUPER combination ranks 681st out of 3712 tested configurations for Minimum, placing it in the top 18.4% of all systems. This is a strong showing, especially considering the game's age and the high-end nature of the GPU. The rank reflects the GPU's 83rd percentile standing among all graphics cards, while the CPU's 77th percentile helps ensure no bottlenecking occurs.

The ranking position is more indicative of the GPU's performance than the CPU's, as Minimum appears to be GPU-limited at all tested settings. The RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 43223 is notably higher than its nearest rivals, and this translates directly to the high FPS figures observed. The CPU's 77th percentile is sufficient to avoid limiting the GPU, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates across different resolutions and the lack of any CPU-related stuttering in the data.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant factor in Minimum's performance, while the CPU provides ample headroom. This is evident from the scaling behavior. At 1080p Low, the system hits 307.9 FPS, but this drops to 196.6 FPS at 1440p and 105.7 FPS at 4K—a 66% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads, where pixel count directly impacts frame rate.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings, where the GPU is less saturated. At 1080p Low, the 307.9 FPS figure suggests the CPU can feed the GPU at very high rates, and the Ryzen 7 5700X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads with 96 MB of L3 cache are more than sufficient. The CPU's single-thread score of 3157 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, which is crucial for game logic and draw calls.

However, the data shows that even at 1080p, the GPU remains the limiting factor. The difference between Low (307.9 FPS) and Ultra (149.5 FPS) at 1080p is a 51% reduction, which is entirely attributable to GPU workload—the CPU's workload does not change significantly between presets. At 4K, the same preset change (105.7 to 54.7 FPS) represents a 48% drop, further confirming that the GPU governs performance. The CPU's impact is minimal, and users should focus on GPU settings when optimizing for Minimum.

For higher resolutions, the GPU's dominance grows. At 4K, the pixel count quadruples compared to 1080p, and the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are pushed harder. The CPU's architecture, while capable, is not the bottleneck at any resolution. This means that for users seeking higher frame rates, reducing GPU settings (especially at 4K) is the most effective lever, while CPU choice matters little for this specific game.