Minimum

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 sits in a tight cluster of comparable processors according to the database's aggregate scoring. Its average benchmark score of 25517 places it within fractions of a percent of several rivals. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER trails by just 0.1% with a score of 25530, while the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H also sits 0.1% behind at 25550. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is 0.1% ahead at 25485, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U leads by 0.3% with 25446. These deltas are so small that in practical gaming workloads, the choice between them would rarely produce a perceptible difference. The Ryzen 7 5700's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs reinforces this picture: it is a solidly mid-to-upper tier part, not a flagship, but well clear of entry-level territory.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 posts an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, is effectively tied with a 0% delta at 15283. The AMD Radeon 680M comes 0.1% ahead at 15270, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 0.6% at 15199, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8% ahead at 15171. The pattern here is notable: the RTX 2060 is bracketed by a much older flagship, an integrated graphics solution, and two newer discrete cards. This suggests the RTX 2060 occupies a performance plateau where generational improvements have not translated into dramatic score differences. For a game like Minimum, a user swapping between these cards would likely see comparable frame rates, assuming other system components remain constant.

The implication for this specific combination is that neither component is an outlier relative to its peers. Both are near the middle of their respective performance distributions, and both have close rivals that could substitute without materially changing the experience. The CPU's multi-threaded strength, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655, and the GPU's 6.451 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, position this pair as a balanced, mainstream setup.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K resolution?

A: No, not at a playable level. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 55.5 on Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High, Medium, and Ultra settings produce 37.9, 38.8, and 27.5 FPS respectively, all well under the threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 deliver 66.3 FPS on average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution. Low and Medium also work, at 101.5 and 75 FPS, but Ultra drops to 48.2 FPS and is not playable.

Q: Is 1080p Ultra settings achievable?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system averages 75.5 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the best settings preset available at 1080p.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517. It is within 0.3% of four rivals: the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25530, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25550, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25485, +0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25446, +0.3%). Performance differences are negligible.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 averages 15290 in benchmarks. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 is exactly tied (15283, 0%), the AMD Radeon 680M is 0.1% ahead (15270), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 0.6% ahead (15199), and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8% ahead (15171). All are effectively equivalent.

Q: What percentage of all CPUs does the Ryzen 7 5700 outperform?

A: The processor ranks in the 78th percentile among all CPUs. For the GPU, the RTX 2060 ranks in the 58th percentile among all GPUs.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 155.1 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 117.5 on Medium and 100.8 on High. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 79.6 FPS (155.1 down to 75.5). This large spread indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor: as settings increase, the render load grows and frame rates fall proportionally. The CPU has enough headroom at 1080p to feed the GPU at all settings, since even the Ultra preset stays above 75 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern intensifies. Low settings produce 101.5 FPS, Medium 75, High 66.3, and Ultra 48.2. The drop from Low to Ultra is 53.3 FPS. The GPU is clearly under more strain here, as the higher pixel count increases the cost of every effect. The CPU's role diminishes further: at 1440p, the bottleneck is almost entirely the GPU's fill rate and shading throughput.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. Low settings yield 55.5 FPS, but Medium falls to 38.8, High to 37.9, and Ultra to 27.5. The difference between Low and Medium is 16.7 FPS, a steep penalty for a single preset step. The CPU is largely idle at this resolution relative to the GPU's workload. The data shows that the Ryzen 7 5700's eight cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for Minimum at any resolution; the RTX 2060's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth determine the ceiling.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 53.6 FPS (155.1 to 101.5), and moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 46 FPS (101.5 to 55.5). At Ultra settings, the same progression goes from 75.5 to 48.2 to 27.5, a consistent halving at each step. This is textbook GPU-bound behavior. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need a stronger GPU, not a stronger CPU.

The Verdict

The verdict data is unambiguous. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset: Low (155.1 FPS), Medium (117.5), High (100.8), and Ultra (75.5). The best playable setting at this resolution is Ultra, with an average of 75.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system is playable on Low (101.5), Medium (75), and High (66.3), but not on Ultra (48.2). The best playable setting at 1440p is High at 66.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, no setting reaches 60 FPS. The highest average is 55.5 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. The verdict is therefore: this PC runs Minimum well at 1080p across all settings, runs it acceptably at 1440p up to High settings, and cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K under any preset.

The 60 FPS threshold is the key reference. At 1080p, the system has substantial headroom: even the most demanding preset exceeds the threshold by 15.5 FPS. At 1440p, High settings clear the threshold by only 6.3 FPS, leaving little margin for demanding scenes. At 4K, the system falls short by at least 4.5 FPS even at Low settings. For users with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this is a capable configuration. For 4K displays, it is not.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database includes average FPS measurements for three resolutions and four settings presets, with no minimum or maximum frame time data recorded.

At 1920x1080, the results are: Low settings average 155.1 FPS, Medium 117.5, High 100.8, and Ultra 75.5. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline of roughly 20 to 25 FPS per preset step, with the largest single drop being 37.6 FPS from Low to Medium.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 101.5, Medium 75, High 66.3, and Ultra 48.2. The drop from Medium to High is only 8.7 FPS, but the drop from High to Ultra is 18.1 FPS, indicating that Ultra settings impose a disproportionate cost at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 55.5, Medium 38.8, High 37.9, and Ultra 27.5. Notably, Medium and High are nearly identical, with a difference of just 0.9 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, certain settings have minimal impact on performance, likely because the GPU is already saturated by the pixel count. The gap between Low and Medium is 16.7 FPS, while the gap between Medium and Ultra is 11.3 FPS.

No minimum or maximum FPS values are available in the recorded data, so frame pacing and stutter behavior cannot be assessed. The averages alone indicate a generally smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, with the 4K results falling below the playable threshold across the board.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested CPU and GPU combinations for Minimum, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2878th out of 3712 total combinations. This places it in the lower portion of the distribution, around the 22.5th percentile of tested combos. The rank reflects the GPU's modest position relative to the full range of tested hardware: the RTX 2060's 58th percentile among all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 78th percentile, does not produce a high combo ranking because the game's performance ceiling is set by the GPU at most settings.

The ranking implies that a substantial majority of tested combinations deliver higher average frame rates in Minimum. However, the rank is not a measure of playability. As the measured FPS data shows, this combo is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p. The low rank is explained by the fact that many tested systems use more powerful GPUs, which push frame rates far beyond the 60 FPS threshold. For a user with a standard 1080p display, the rank is largely irrelevant; the system meets the playability criterion with room to spare.

The gap between this combo and higher-ranked ones is not necessarily linear. Because the game is GPU-bound at higher resolutions and settings, the difference between the 2878th and, say, the 1000th combo could be substantial at 4K but minimal at 1080p Low. The recorded data shows that this combo's 1080p Low average of 155.1 FPS is already high in absolute terms, so the ranking likely reflects performance at more demanding settings where the RTX 2060's limitations become apparent.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 75.5 FPS. This is the clear recommendation for 1080p users: all four presets are playable, and Ultra provides the highest visual quality without sacrificing the 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, with an average of 66.3 FPS. Ultra falls to 48.2 FPS and is not playable. Users at 1440p should select High for the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. Low and Medium also remain playable, at 101.5 and 75 FPS respectively, but High is the best option that still meets the threshold.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings come closest at 55.5 FPS, but this is below the playable threshold. The database's verdict list for 4K is empty, confirming that no playable setting exists at this resolution. Users with 4K displays would need to lower the resolution to 1440p or 1080p, or accept sub-60 FPS performance at 4K. The best settings per resolution are therefore: Ultra at 1080p (75.5 FPS), High at 1440p (66.3 FPS), and no playable option at 4K.