Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 36 | 42 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 68 | 81 | 105 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 106 | 128 | 165 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The data shows a clear performance ceiling at Ultra settings on higher resolutions, while lower presets provide significant headroom. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, ranking, and component roles based strictly on the benchmark data.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Ultra, achieving 82.3 FPS on average. This indicates the combo has enough headroom to run the game at maximum visual quality without dipping below the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, which delivers 67.7 FPS on average. While Medium (80.5 FPS) and Low (105.1 FPS) also clear the 60 FPS bar, High is the most visually demanding option that remains playable. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 52 FPS, which is below the target.
At 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The closest option is Low at 58.8 FPS, which is still just under the playable mark. The verdict data confirms that no playable settings exist at 4K for this combo, with High, Medium, and Ultra all falling progressively further behind at 35.9 FPS, 41.5 FPS, and 29.5 FPS respectively.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3,712 tested combinations, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2,788th in Minimum. This places it in the lower third of all tested combos, which is notable given the hardware’s individual specifications. The rank suggests that while the combo handles 1080p and 1440p well, its overall standing is dragged down by its inability to sustain playable frame rates at 4K.
The CPU’s percentile ranking versus all processors is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of tested CPUs. The GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 68, indicating it is a mid-to-upper tier graphics card. Despite these respectable individual standings, the combo rank of 2,788 out of 3,712 illustrates that Minimum is a demanding title that punishes this pairing at higher resolutions, especially when compared to other systems that may have more balanced or higher-end components.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The performance scaling across presets is substantial. Low settings yield 164.7 FPS on average, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Moving to Medium drops the average to 128 FPS, a decrease of 36.7 FPS from Low. High settings produce 106.1 FPS, and Ultra comes in at 82.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 82.4 FPS, showing that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution, but the cost of Ultra is a 50% reduction in frame rate compared to Low.
2560x1440: The trend continues with a tighter spread. Low delivers 105.1 FPS, while Medium achieves 80.5 FPS. High is the last playable tier at 67.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 52 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 53.1 FPS, indicating that resolution scaling has a more pronounced effect on the higher presets. The jump from High to Ultra costs 15.7 FPS, which is the largest single-preset drop at this resolution.
3840x2160: Performance falls off sharply. Low manages 58.8 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS target. Medium drops to 41.5 FPS, and High falls to 35.9 FPS. Ultra is the least playable at 29.5 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 29.3 FPS, showing that even the lowest preset cannot cross the playable threshold. The data indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s and 12 GB VRAM are insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700’s average benchmark score of 25,517 is closely matched by several processors. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25,530, a -0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25,485, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25,550, a -0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25,446, a 0.3% difference. These CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the 5700’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provides a strong foundation.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580’s average score of 23,021 is flanked by several comparable cards. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23,061, a -0.2% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22,895, a 0.6% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23,172, a -0.7% difference. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249, a -1% difference. These GPUs would offer very similar rasterization performance in Minimum, meaning users with any of these cards should expect comparable frame rates at the same settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU remains capable throughout. At 1920x1080, the frame rate scales dramatically with preset changes: Low hits 164.7 FPS, but Ultra drops to 82.3 FPS. This 82.4 FPS swing indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor when increasing visual fidelity, as the CPU’s 16 threads are ample for the game’s logic at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern persists but with a narrower range. Low achieves 105.1 FPS, while Ultra falls to 52 FPS. The 53.1 FPS difference shows that the GPU’s workload scales with resolution, but the CPU still keeps pace. The fact that High remains playable at 67.7 FPS suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at this resolution, but Ultra demands more shading and texture throughput than the Arc B580 can provide.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become stark. Low barely misses the target at 58.8 FPS, and every other preset falls below 41.5 FPS. The CPU’s role diminishes here, as the GPU’s pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s are insufficient for 4K rendering in this title. The data confirms that upgrading the GPU would yield the largest frame rate gains at 4K, while the CPU’s 3dmark 16-thread score of 6,628 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,655 indicate it is not the constraint.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K?*
A: No. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 3840x2160. The closest preset, Low, averages 58.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets fall further behind.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: High is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 67.7 FPS. Medium and Low also clear the threshold, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining playable.
Q: How much faster is Low vs Ultra at 1080p?
A: Low averages 164.7 FPS, while Ultra averages 82.3 FPS. This represents an 82.4 FPS difference, meaning Low is roughly twice as fast as Ultra at 1080p.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU’s performance is sufficient across all presets, as evidenced by playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K.
Q: What GPU performance is comparable to the Arc B580?
A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, RTX 3080, and NVIDIA P106-100. All of these have average scores within 1% of the Arc B580’s 23,021 average.
Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among tested systems?
A: It ranks 2,788th out of 3,712 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of all systems tested for Minimum.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B580 can run Minimum successfully at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 82.3 FPS — the best visual quality that clears the 60 FPS target. At 2560x1440, High is the top playable preset at 67.7 FPS, while Ultra dips to 52 FPS and is not recommended. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, with the best option being Low at 58.8 FPS, which still falls short.
For users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo delivers a smooth experience at high settings. The data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K, and the system’s overall rank of 2,788 out of 3,712 reflects this shortcoming. If 4K performance is required, a more powerful GPU would be necessary, but for the vast majority of players using 1080p or 1440p displays, this pairing is more than adequate for Minimum.