Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 64 | 73 | 97 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 116 | 134 | 179 |
| 1080p Full HD | 138 | 181 | 214 | 278 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a decisive performance profile for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. The recorded data shows that this pairing is overwhelmingly capable, with every tested resolution and preset combination at 1080p and 1440p clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only limitation appears at 4K with the Ultra preset, where the average frame rate dips below the threshold. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data to determine exactly how this system handles the game.
Best Settings per Resolution
The database records average FPS figures for four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) across three resolutions. The "best" setting is defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system achieves the highest possible fidelity without compromise. The Ultra preset runs at an average of 137.7 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best setting for this resolution, as it provides the maximum visual quality while still delivering a frame rate that is more than double the playable minimum.
At 2560x1440, the results are similarly impressive. The Ultra preset averages 89 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS bar. This makes Ultra the best setting for 1440p as well, proving the combination has ample headroom at this resolution. The data shows a clear progression from 1080p to 1440p, but the performance drop is not steep enough to force a reduction in visual quality.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Ultra preset averages 48.4 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset, however, averages 63.7 FPS, which clears the bar. Therefore, the best setting for 4K is High. This is the only resolution where the system cannot run the game at its highest visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals a clear picture of component roles. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 278.3 FPS and the Ultra preset still reaching 137.7 FPS. These numbers suggest that at this resolution, the system is largely bound by the CPU's ability to feed the GPU, as the GPU is not being pushed to its limit. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is roughly 140 FPS, showing that the GPU workload increases significantly with visual fidelity, but the CPU is still able to keep up.
Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop across all presets. The Low preset averages 179.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 89 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across presets, indicating that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as the pixel count increases. The CPU still has enough headroom to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's rendering load is now more pronounced.
At 4K, the roles shift decisively. The Low preset averages 97.2 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 179.4 FPS at 1440p. The Ultra preset drops to 48.4 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. This pattern shows that at 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The CPU has the processing power to handle the game logic, but the RTX 4070's rendering capabilities are stretched thin by the 3840x2160 resolution, particularly at higher presets. The data suggests that for this game, the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU is more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with the Ultra preset?*
A: No. The recorded average FPS for the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 is 48.4, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 4K?
A: The High preset is the best option. It averages 63.7 FPS at 3840x2160, which clears the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Does the system achieve 60 FPS on all presets at 2560x1440?
A: Yes. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) average above 60 FPS at this resolution, with Ultra averaging 89 FPS.
Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to the Ultra preset at 1080p?
A: The Low preset averages 278.3 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 137.7 FPS. This represents a difference of roughly 140 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU is more relevant at 1080p, as frame rates are extremely high (up to 278.3 FPS on Low), indicating the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower settings.
Q: What is the average FPS on the Medium preset at 1440p?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 averages 134.4 FPS.
The Verdict
The recorded data confirms that this PC can run Minimum with ease in most scenarios. The verdict by resolution is clear:
At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable. All four presets, including Ultra, run at an average FPS well above the 60 FPS threshold. The best results come from the Ultra preset at 137.7 FPS, making this resolution entirely playable at maximum settings.
At 2560x1440, the system remains fully capable. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 89 FPS, which provides a smooth experience with high visual fidelity. This is a strong result for a 1440p display.
At 3840x2160, the system is partially capable. The Ultra preset falls short at 48.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. However, the High preset averages 63.7 FPS, allowing the game to run at a solid frame rate with slightly reduced settings. For 4K gaming, the user must choose between High settings for a playable experience or Ultra settings for a less smooth one.
Overall, this combination is a strong performer for Minimum. It easily handles 1080p and 1440p at the highest settings, and it can manage 4K with a minor settings adjustment.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table presents the exact average FPS figures recorded for each resolution and preset combination. The data shows a consistent pattern of performance scaling.
At 1920x1080:
- Low: 278.3 FPS
- Medium: 213.8 FPS
- High: 181.2 FPS
- Ultra: 137.7 FPS
At 2560x1440:
- Low: 179.4 FPS
- Medium: 134.4 FPS
- High: 115.7 FPS
- Ultra: 89 FPS
At 3840x2160:
- Low: 97.2 FPS
- Medium: 72.6 FPS
- High: 63.7 FPS
- Ultra: 48.4 FPS
The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the average FPS decreases across all presets. The gap between Low and Ultra also widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 140.6 FPS. At 1440p, this gap is 90.4 FPS. At 4K, the gap narrows to 48.8 FPS, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. All recorded figures lack min and max FPS values, so the analysis relies solely on average performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 at position 852 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places the system in the top quarter of all tested configurations, indicating a strong performance tier.
The CPU itself ranks in the 84th percentile against all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 34260. Its nearest rivals show a tight grouping. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, a delta of 0.1%. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, a 0.5% difference. These small deltas show that the Ryzen 7 3700X is competitively positioned among its immediate peers.
The GPU ranks in the 81st percentile against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 37648. Its nearest rivals also show minimal differences. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a delta of 0.4%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% difference. The RTX 4070's position among these rivals indicates a balanced performance profile.
The combo's rank of 852 out of 3712 reflects the combined strength of both components. The CPU's high percentile and the GPU's high percentile together place this system well above the median for running Minimum. The measured FPS data supports this ranking, showing that the system delivers excellent performance across all resolutions, with the only caveat being the Ultra preset at 4K.