Minimum

This PC combo, pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, delivers a commanding performance in Minimum, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all tested system configurations. The data shows that this is not merely a playable setup; it is one that crushes the game's requirements across all tested resolutions, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors and maximum visual fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU and GPU pairing achieves a combo rank of 246 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places it in the top 6.6% of all systems, a position that reflects the high-tier nature of both components. The ranking indicates that the system is far more powerful than what Minimum requires, providing a substantial performance buffer.

The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, sits in the 81st percentile against all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score of 29,713 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scoring 29,656 (a negligible 0.2% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scoring 29,868 (-0.5%). This suggests the 9600X offers performance squarely in line with other strong mid-range and high-end processors, with no single rival holding a meaningful advantage in synthetic workloads.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 holds the 86th percentile against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 54,247 is remarkably close to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54,209 (a 0.1% difference). The other closest competitors, such as the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54,828 (-1.1%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (-2.6%), are actually slightly ahead in raw synthetic score, but the differences are minor and unlikely to translate into discernible in-game performance gaps. The RTX 4080's strength here is its ability to pair high frame rates with advanced features like ray tracing and DLSS, though the latter is not a factor in this specific game's measurements.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes. The data confirms that the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 4080 combo is fully playable at 3840x2160. The measured average frame rates are 79 FPS on High, 95 FPS on Medium, 124 FPS on Low, and 61 FPS on Ultra, all exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: For 2560x1440, the system can run the game at the Ultra preset with an average of 112 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it still delivers a frame rate nearly double the playable threshold, leaving plenty of headroom for a high-refresh-rate monitor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X's average benchmark score of 29,713 is virtually tied with its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29,656), and just 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29,868). These differences are within the margin of error and indicate performance parity.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 significantly different from the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: In synthetic benchmarks, the difference is negligible. The RTX 4080 scores 54,247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, a delta of just 0.1%. In real-world gaming, you would not notice a difference in Minimum between these two cards.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p?

A: The performance at 1920x1080 is exceptionally high. The system achieves 356 FPS on Low, 273 FPS on Medium, 229 FPS on High, and 174 FPS on Ultra settings. This makes the combo ideal for 1080p esports-level refresh rates, even at the highest visual quality.

Q: Is the performance data measured or estimated?

A: The data is directly measured. The "dataIsMeasured" flag is set to true, meaning the frame rates are the result of actual hardware testing, not theoretical calculations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. The most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, still holds an average of 61 FPS, which is right at the playable threshold. The 4K Medium preset shows more comfortable headroom with an average of 95 FPS, along with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS. At 4K High, the average jumps to 79 FPS, and at 4K Low, it reaches 124 FPS.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the system demonstrates its strength for high-refresh-rate gaming. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 112 FPS, while High, Medium, and Low presets produce 148 FPS, 176 FPS, and 230 FPS respectively. The Medium preset at this resolution shows a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 202 FPS, indicating smooth frame pacing.

At 1920x1080, the performance is staggering. The system is clearly CPU-limited at this resolution, as even the Ultra preset achieves an average of 174 FPS. The High preset hits 229 FPS, Medium reaches 273 FPS, and Low explodes to 356 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only min/max data, showing a minimum of 232 FPS and a maximum of 313 FPS. This level of performance ensures that the monitor, not the hardware, will be the limiting factor for most users.

The Verdict

The verdict is unambiguous: this PC can run Minimum with exceptional proficiency. According to the verdict by resolution data, the combo is listed as playable on all settings at every tested resolution. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 61, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, but with a much higher average of 112 FPS. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves a blistering 174 FPS.

This system is not just capable of running the game; it is capable of running it at maximum settings with high frame rates at 4K, and at extremely high frame rates at 1440p and 1080p. The only minor point of caution is the 4K Ultra result of 61 FPS, which is close to the threshold and could dip below 60 in particularly busy scenes, though the average suggests it is generally stable. For a flawless 4K experience, the High preset at 79 FPS or the Medium preset at 95 FPS offers more comfortable margins.

Similar Performance Alternatives

If you are considering this build but want to explore nearby hardware, the benchmark data identifies several components that would offer nearly identical performance. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, with an average score of 29,656, would behave almost exactly like the Ryzen 5 9600X (a 0.2% difference). The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29,868) and AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29,879) are also performance peers, being just 0.5% and 0.6% slower respectively. These processors would yield virtually the same frame rates in Minimum.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, with a score of 54,209 versus the RTX 4080's 54,247—a 0.1% difference. You would see no practical difference in this game. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698), and AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757) all score slightly higher in synthetic benchmarks, suggesting they might offer a marginal performance gain, though the 1-3% delta is unlikely to be noticeable in actual gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

For a target of 60 FPS or higher, the data points to the most demanding preset that maintains this performance at each resolution.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is Ultra, which yields an average of 61 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system is pushed near its limit, but it still clears the playable threshold. If you prefer more headroom, the High preset at 79 FPS or Medium at 95 FPS are safer choices.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, delivering an average of 112 FPS. This is a superb result, providing both maximum visual quality and a frame rate suitable for 144Hz monitors.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best playable setting, with an average of 174 FPS. This level of performance is exceptional and leaves significant room for future, more demanding titles or for using additional system resources in the background.