Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 38 | 42 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 67 | 79 | 108 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 106 | 122 | 163 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a solid 1080p gaming experience for Minimum, but the data shows a sharp drop-off as resolution climbs. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is best suited for 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 gaming, where it clears the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. At 4K, however, the hardware falls short of a smooth frame rate across all tested presets. The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of what to expect from this CPU and GPU pairing.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combo show a clear hierarchy across resolutions and presets.
At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are the lowest of any resolution. The Low preset delivers an average of 54.9 FPS, which is the only 4K result within striking distance of the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset drops to 42.4 FPS average, while High manages 37.5 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing an average of just 26.2 FPS. None of these results reach the playable threshold.
Stepping down to 2560x1440 yields a significant improvement. The Low preset averages 107.5 FPS, which is a strong result. Medium follows at 78.9 FPS, and High is just above the playable threshold at 66.5 FPS. Ultra is the exception, averaging 50.8 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS mark. This resolution offers three presets that are playable.
At 1920x1080, the combo performs at its best. The Low preset averages 163.1 FPS, making it exceptionally smooth. Medium produces 122.4 FPS, and High delivers 105.8 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 77.7 FPS, which is comfortably above the playable threshold. All four presets at this resolution are fully playable.
The data shows no min or max FPS values, so the analysis relies strictly on average frame rates. The pattern is clear: as resolution increases, average FPS drops substantially at every preset level. The difference between 1080p and 4K is massive, with the 4K Low preset averaging about a third of the 1080p Low preset's frame rate.
How This Combo Ranks
This CPU and GPU pairing ranks 2845th out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The rank reflects the combo's overall capability across all tested scenarios, not just the resolutions listed here. Given that the combo handles 1080p and 1440p well but struggles at 4K, a mid-pack ranking is consistent with the measured data.
The ranking should be interpreted with the resolution data in mind. A rank below the 50th percentile suggests that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game. However, the rank does not tell the whole story. The measured FPS at 1080p and 1440p shows that this particular combo is fully capable of a smooth experience for most players, even if it does not top the charts. The combo's position in the database is a broad measure, while the actual FPS numbers are what matter for a practical buying decision.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU is likely doing a larger share of the work relative to the GPU, given the high frame rates. The Low preset averages 163.1 FPS, which is a CPU-heavy scenario where the Ryzen 5 9600X's strong single-thread performance can shine. As the preset moves to Ultra, the average drops to 77.7 FPS, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder with additional graphical effects.
At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. The frame rates are lower than at 1080p across all presets, which is expected as the number of pixels increases. The gap between Low (107.5 FPS) and Ultra (50.8 FPS) shows a 57 FPS difference, suggesting that the Intel Arc B580's rendering capacity is being tested at the higher preset levels. The CPU still matters, but the GPU's role in maintaining frame rates is clearly more significant at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant bottleneck. Even the Low preset only averages 54.9 FPS, which means the Arc B580 is struggling to keep up with the pixel count. The CPU is likely waiting on the GPU at this point, and the frame rates are entirely dictated by the graphics card's throughput. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a dramatic performance drop, confirming that this resolution is beyond the GPU's comfortable range for this game.
The scaling between presets also highlights the GPU's role. At 1080p, going from Low to Ultra costs about 85 FPS on average. At 1440p, that same preset jump costs about 57 FPS. At 4K, it costs about 29 FPS. This trend shows that as resolution increases, the relative cost of higher presets shrinks because the GPU is already saturated at the base level.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what else would behave similarly in this game.
For the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, the closest alternatives are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 0.2% higher on average, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which scores 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is 0.8% lower. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in a GPU-bound scenario like Minimum at higher resolutions. At 1080p with lower presets, where the CPU matters more, the differences would still be minimal given the close scores.
For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 0.2% lower on average, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% lower, and the NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% lower. These small deltas mean that swapping the Arc B580 for any of these cards would result in very similar frame rates in Minimum. The RTX 2080 might edge out a few frames, while the P106-100 might lose a few, but the overall experience would be comparable.
A system with the Ryzen 5 9600X and any of these rival GPUs would behave similarly to the tested combo. Likewise, pairing the Arc B580 with any of the rival CPUs would not change the outcome meaningfully. The performance envelope is tight across these alternatives, so the choice of adjacent hardware would not dramatically alter the FPS numbers in this game.
Best Settings per Resolution
The best settings for each resolution are defined as the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice. It averages 77.7 FPS, which is comfortably above the playable threshold. This allows for the highest visual quality while still delivering a smooth experience. Lower presets like High (105.8 FPS), Medium (122.4 FPS), and Low (163.1 FPS) would provide even higher frame rates, but Ultra offers the best balance of visuals and performance at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best option. It averages 66.5 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS bar. Medium at 78.9 FPS and Low at 107.5 FPS are also playable, but High delivers better visual fidelity while staying above the threshold. The Ultra preset at 50.8 FPS is not playable, so High is the highest preset that works.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best result is the Low preset at 54.9 FPS, which falls short of 60 FPS. Medium (42.4 FPS), High (37.5 FPS), and Ultra (26.2 FPS) are all further below the threshold. Users at this resolution would need to accept lower than playable frame rates or consider other hardware.
The Verdict
The Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B580 can run Minimum, but only at specific resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo is fully capable, with all four presets clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 77.7 FPS is the standout option, providing high quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable on High, Medium, and Low presets. The High preset at 66.5 FPS is the best playable option, though the gap to the 60 FPS threshold is narrower than at 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the combo is not playable at any preset. The best result is Low at 54.9 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target. The verdict is clear: this system is a strong choice for 1080p and a good choice for 1440p, but it is not suited for 4K gaming in Minimum. Players with a 1080p monitor will have the best experience, with headroom to spare. Those with 1440p displays can still enjoy the game on high settings, but they should avoid the Ultra preset. 4K users should look elsewhere, as the GPU simply cannot keep up with the pixel load in this title.