Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 49 | 61 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 70 | 96 | 112 | 147 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 150 | 178 | 232 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a strong combination for Minimum, delivering a smooth 60+ FPS experience at 1080p and 1440p across all presets, while 4K requires a settings reduction to Medium. This combo ranks in the 1587th position out of 3712 tested configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all hardware pairings evaluated for this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 1587 out of 3712 tested combinations places it within the top 43% of all systems benchmarked for Minimum. This is a respectable standing, indicating that the pairing is well-balanced for the game’s demands, though it is not at the extreme top end where specialized high-refresh-rate or 4K-ultra configurations reside. The ranking reflects a system that will comfortably handle the game’s core mechanics without struggling, but it also shows there is headroom above for more expensive components.
The CPU’s individual percentile of 79 against all processors is notably higher than the GPU’s 61 against all graphics cards. This suggests the Ryzen 5 7600X is a stronger relative performer than the RTX 3070 when compared to their respective product stacks. In practice, this means the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most scenarios, allowing the GPU to dictate the final frame rates. The GPU’s lower percentile, while still above average, indicates that the graphics card is the component that will define the upper limits of performance, especially at higher resolutions where the rendering load increases.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component importance depending on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound at lower presets. The jump from Low to Ultra yields a significant frame rate change (231.8 FPS to 110.4 FPS), but even the Low preset’s 231.8 FPS suggests the CPU is feeding frames faster than the GPU can render them at the highest settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1060 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1965, ensures that the game’s logic and draw calls are processed efficiently, preventing a CPU bottleneck that would cap FPS below the GPU’s potential.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more prominent role. The frame rate drops from 147.1 FPS at Low to 70.4 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of 52%. This scaling shows that the RTX 3070’s rendering capabilities are being taxed more heavily. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The difference between Low (79.3 FPS) and Ultra (39.6 FPS) is stark, and even the Medium preset (60.9 FPS) barely clears the 60 FPS threshold. Here, the CPU’s role is diminished, as the GPU’s pixel and texture processing rates (165.6 GPixel/s and 317.4 GTexel/s) are the primary constraints on performance.
The scaling between presets is consistent across resolutions, but the magnitude of the impact grows with resolution. At 1080p, the Ultra preset is 52% slower than Low; at 1440p, it is 52% slower; and at 4K, it is 50% slower. This consistency indicates that the settings’ graphical effects (shadows, textures, post-processing) have a uniform cost per pixel, but the absolute number of pixels at 4K amplifies that cost, making the GPU the sole determinant of playability at that resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 110.4 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a high level of visual fidelity. The data shows no reason to reduce settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset offers a comfortable margin for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains the best option, with an average of 70.4 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 17% margin, allowing for a fully maxed-out visual experience at this popular resolution. The High preset (96.4 FPS) and Medium preset (111.5 FPS) offer even higher frame rates if a player prioritizes refresh rate over graphical detail, but the Ultra preset is demonstrably playable.
For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Medium, which achieves an average of 60.9 FPS. This is a marginal pass over the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset (48.6 FPS) and Ultra preset (39.6 FPS) fall short of playability, while the Low preset (79.3 FPS) is playable but requires a significant sacrifice in visual quality. Players at 4K must choose between the just-above-60 FPS of Medium or the higher frame rate of Low, with no option to use High or Ultra settings without dropping below the playable threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, both with an average benchmark score of 27578, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 7600X’s 27636. This means that in Minimum, these three CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates, with the 7600X holding a negligible 0.2% advantage. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is also very close, with a score of 27535, just 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is slightly ahead, with a score of 27712, representing a 0.3% difference. For practical purposes, any of these CPUs would deliver indistinguishable performance in this game, making them valid substitutes if the 7600X is unavailable.
On the GPU side, the closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, with an average score of 17083, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070’s 17208. This indicates that the two cards would perform within a hair of each other in Minimum. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (score 17037, 1% lower) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (score 17019, 1.1% lower) are also in the same performance ballpark, though their older architectures may lack some modern features. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c is slightly faster, with a score of 17468, 1.5% higher than the RTX 3070, but this is a compute-focused card not intended for gaming. For gaming purposes, the RX 7600 XT is the most relevant alternative, offering near-identical performance.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 110.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at this resolution exceed 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best 4K setting for this combo?
A: The Medium preset is the best playable option, with an average of 60.9 FPS. This narrowly clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low runs faster at 79.3 FPS, but High (48.6 FPS) and Ultra (39.6 FPS) are not playable.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for 1440p performance?
A: At 2560x1440, the GPU is the more significant factor. The frame rate scales from 147.1 FPS at Low to 70.4 FPS at Ultra, showing a clear dependence on graphics settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance prevents a bottleneck, but the RTX 3070’s rendering capacity sets the upper limit.
Q: How does this combo compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with the same GPU?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 5700X have nearly identical average benchmark scores (27636 vs 27578), with the 7600X being 0.2% faster. In Minimum, you would not notice a performance difference between these two CPUs.
Q: What is the frame rate at 1440p Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate at 2560x1440 with the Ultra preset is 70.4 FPS. This is 17% above the 60 FPS playable threshold, providing a smooth experience with all graphical features enabled.
Q: Is the RTX 3070 a bottleneck at 4K?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate drops to 39.6 FPS at Ultra and 48.6 FPS at High, both below the 60 FPS threshold. Only Medium and Low presets are playable, indicating the GPU cannot handle the full visual load at 4K.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum effectively at 1080p and 1440p, with the ability to max out settings at both resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 110.4 FPS, and at 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 70.4 FPS, both comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The system is fully capable of delivering a high-refresh-rate experience at 1080p and a visually rich, smooth experience at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the system is only partially playable. The Medium preset produces 60.9 FPS, just above the threshold, and the Low preset runs at 79.3 FPS. However, the High and Ultra presets fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The verdict is clear: this combo is a strong 1080p and 1440p performer, but 4K users must compromise on settings to maintain playability. For players targeting 4K, the Medium preset is the highest visual quality that remains playable, though the margin is slim. Overall, this is a capable system for Minimum that will satisfy most players except those demanding 4K Ultra.