Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
79 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
104 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
53 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
57 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
9.7ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 27,636
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 38 42 57
1440p QHD 53 69 79 104
1080p Full HD 79 103 124 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 103
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 79
2560x1440 High 69
2560x1440 Low 104
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 Ultra 53
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a solid, but resolution-dependent, experience in Minimum. At 1080p, the combo is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings with plenty of headroom, while 1440p requires a slight settings reduction for a locked 60 FPS experience. At 4K, the hardware falls short of the 60 FPS target even on the lowest settings, making it unsuitable for that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions and four quality presets. The benchmark results are consistent with the hardware's expected capabilities, showing a predictable drop in frame rates as resolution and graphical load increase.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest performance. On Low settings, the average FPS is 163.3, which provides an exceptionally smooth and responsive experience. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS drops to 123.9, still far above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset yields an average of 102.5 FPS, demonstrating the CPU-GPU pairing's strength at this resolution. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a strong average of 78.7 FPS, ensuring that the game remains highly playable without sacrificing visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset averages 104.2 FPS, which is a significant decrease from the 1080p result but still excellent. The Medium preset averages 78.5 FPS, keeping the experience fluid. The High preset produces an average of 68.8 FPS, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 53.1 FPS, falling below the playability threshold and indicating that the most demanding settings are too heavy for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the hardware is clearly overburdened. The Low preset averages 57.4 FPS, which is just shy of the 60 FPS target. All other presets fail to reach playable levels: Medium averages 41.9 FPS, High averages 37.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 30.2 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming in Minimum is not viable with this combination, regardless of the chosen settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data identifies the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. This provides a clear directive for the optimal configuration.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best playable setting, achieving an average of 78.7 FPS. This allows users to experience the game with maximum visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate. For 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, delivering an average of 68.8 FPS. This balances visual fidelity with performance, as the Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS target. For 3840x2160, there is no playable settings preset. The best result is with the Low preset, which averages 57.4 FPS, but this still fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold and is therefore not recommended.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global database of tested combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B580 holds a rank of 2831 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum. The percentile data for the individual components helps contextualize this ranking. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, has a percentile ranking of 79 against all tested CPUs, indicating it is a relatively high-performing processor. The GPU, Intel Arc B580, has a percentile ranking of 68 against all tested GPUs, which is also above average. The combination of these two above-average components results in a system that is capable, but not exceptional, for this particular game, as evidenced by its overall rank. The discrepancy between the high component percentiles and the lower combo rank suggests that Minimum may not be fully utilizing the strengths of this particular CPU-GPU pairing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database provides several CPUs and GPUs that perform similarly to the components in this system. These alternatives would produce a comparable gaming experience in Minimum.

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X has an average benchmark score of 27636. Several other processors are within a fraction of a percent of this score. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the Intel Core i5-12600K both have an average score of 27578, which is 0.2% slower than the 7600X. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has an average score of 27535, a 0.4% difference. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has an average score of 27712, which is 0.3% faster. These systems would offer nearly identical CPU-bound performance.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, has a score of 23061, which is 0.2% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, making it 0.6% slower. Conversely, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, a 0.7% performance lead, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a 1% lead. Choosing any of these GPUs in a similar system would result in frame rates very close to those measured for the Arc B580.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the FPS scaling across resolutions and presets reveals which component is the limiting factor in this system. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is even more dramatic, indicating a growing GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more prominent role. The difference between the Low preset (163.3 FPS) and the Ultra preset (78.7 FPS) is substantial, showing that the GPU is being stressed more as settings increase. However, the high frame rates suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU sufficiently. The performance is well-balanced.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to become the primary bottleneck. The frame rates are lower across all presets compared to 1080p, and the gap between the Low (104.2 FPS) and Ultra (53.1 FPS) presets shows the GPU's workload increasing. The CPU's role diminishes as the resolution increases, as the GPU's rendering capabilities are the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The frame rates are low across all presets, with even the Low preset failing to hit 60 FPS. The performance scaling between presets is small (from 57.4 FPS on Low to 30.2 FPS on Ultra), which indicates that the GPU is saturated and unable to improve performance with lower settings. The CPU has ample headroom at this resolution, as it is not the limiting factor. The data shows that the Intel Arc B580 is not powerful enough to drive Minimum at 4K, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

The Verdict

The benchmark data provides a definitive answer on the playability of Minimum with this hardware. The verdict is resolution-dependent.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the game. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the best experience being on Ultra at an average of 78.7 FPS. This is the ideal configuration for a smooth, high-fidelity experience.

At 2560x1440, the system remains capable, but with limitations. The High preset is the best playable option, averaging 68.8 FPS. The Low and Medium presets are also playable, but the Ultra preset, at 53.1 FPS, does not meet the 60 FPS threshold. Users with a 1440p monitor should stick to High settings for the best balance.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable level. No preset achieves an average of 60 FPS. The closest is the Low preset at 57.4 FPS, which is below the playability threshold. This hardware combination is not recommended for 4K gaming in Minimum. In summary, this PC is an excellent choice for 1080p and a good choice for 1440p gaming in Minimum, but it is not suitable for 4K.