Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 42 | 50 | 65 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 92 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 92 | 120 | 143 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, but 4K requires significant compromises. At 4K, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, while 1440p High hits 78 FPS and 1080p Ultra reaches 92 FPS, making this combo a versatile choice for high-refresh gaming at mainstream resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
1920x1080 (1080p): The Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS. Benchmark results show an average of 92 FPS at Ultra, which provides ample headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms that all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution, with Ultra delivering the highest visual fidelity while maintaining smooth performance.
2560x1440 (1440p): High settings represent the best balance, averaging 78 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains above 60 FPS at this resolution. The Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS average, just below the playable threshold, while Medium runs at 92 FPS and Low at 121 FPS. The High preset offers the strongest visual quality without sacrificing the 60 FPS requirement.
3840x2160 (4K): Only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS bar, averaging 65 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, High falls to 42 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32 FPS. For 4K gaming, the data indicates that Low settings are the sole viable option, sacrificing most visual enhancements to maintain acceptable frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals that the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases, while the CPU's role diminishes. The Ryzen 5 7600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the RX 9060 at lower resolutions, but the GPU's workload grows disproportionately at higher pixel counts.
At 1080p, the frame rate differences between presets are substantial—from 187 FPS at Low to 92 FPS at Ultra. This wide spread indicates that the GPU has significant headroom when the CPU can feed it quickly. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 3910, ensures that processing overhead does not limit frame rates at this resolution.
At 1440p, the scaling pattern shifts. The gap between Low (121 FPS) and Ultra (59 FPS) narrows proportionally compared to 1080p, suggesting the GPU is beginning to take on more work. The Medium preset's 92 FPS and High's 78 FPS show a consistent gradient that reflects GPU-bound rendering at this resolution, with the CPU still able to keep up with the demands.
At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The drop from 65 FPS at Low to 32 FPS at Ultra—a 33 FPS difference—demonstrates that the RX 9060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are being stretched thin at this resolution. The CPU's role becomes almost secondary, as even the fastest processor cannot compensate for the GPU's inability to render 4K Ultra detail at acceptable speeds.
The data shows that the CPU's contribution is most visible in the gap between Low and Medium presets at 1080p, where the 44 FPS difference (187 to 143 FPS) indicates that the CPU can still drive high frame rates when GPU load is light. At 4K, the same preset gap yields only a 15 FPS difference (65 to 50 FPS), confirming that GPU throughput, not CPU speed, dictates performance at higher resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 92 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at this resolution—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra delivering the highest quality at 92 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: High is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 78 FPS at 2560x1440. Ultra falls just short at 59 FPS, so High provides the best visual quality without dropping below the playable threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware combination?
A: Only with significant compromises. The Low preset at 3840x2160 averages 65 FPS, which is playable. However, Medium drops to 50 FPS, High to 42 FPS, and Ultra to 32 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold. 4K playability requires Low settings.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 places it 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129), and 1% ahead of both the AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15862 and 15852 respectively). It also leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679) by 2.1%.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at Ultra settings across resolutions?
A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 92 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 59 FPS, just below the playable threshold. At 4K, Ultra averages only 32 FPS. The data shows a steep performance cliff when moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?
A: The data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at any tested resolution. The Ryzen 5 7600's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735) and the consistent frame rate gradients across presets indicate that GPU workload, not CPU throughput, limits performance at higher resolutions.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum at all three tested resolutions, but the definition of "playable" varies significantly. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, including Ultra at 92 FPS, making it fully capable of high-refresh-rate gaming with maximum visual settings. At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 78 FPS, which meets the playable threshold, while Ultra just misses at 59 FPS—a minor compromise for higher resolution.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. Only the Low preset passes the 60 FPS mark, averaging 65 FPS. The data shows this combo is technically capable of 4K gaming, but only with reduced visual fidelity. The 33 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 4K highlights the GPU's limitations at this resolution, making High and Ultra settings unplayable.
The verdict by resolution: 1080p Ultra is fully playable at 92 FPS; 1440p High is playable at 78 FPS, with Ultra just below the threshold at 59 FPS; 4K Low is playable at 65 FPS, but no higher preset meets the 60 FPS requirement.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The Ultra preset averages 92 FPS, with no min or max values recorded. High averages 120 FPS, Medium averages 143 FPS with a minimum of 122 and maximum of 165. Low averages 187 FPS, the highest result across all resolutions and presets.
2560x1440: Ultra averages 59 FPS, just below the playable threshold. High averages 78 FPS, Medium averages 92 FPS with a minimum of 79 and maximum of 106. Low averages 121 FPS, maintaining smooth performance at the lowest settings.
3840x2160: Ultra averages 32 FPS, the lowest recorded result. High averages 42 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS with a minimum of 42 and maximum of 57. Low averages 65 FPS, the only preset at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS threshold.
The data reveals consistent performance gradients across resolutions, with frame rates scaling predictably from Low to Ultra. The Medium preset provides the only min/max data points at each resolution, offering a window into frame time consistency: at 1080p, the range spans 122 to 165 FPS; at 1440p, 79 to 106 FPS; at 4K, 42 to 57 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 2179 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper half of all systems tested. This percentile position reflects a balanced configuration that handles the game well at mainstream resolutions, though it is not among the top performers for this title.
The CPU's percentile ranking of 78 among all processors indicates strong overall performance, with its average benchmark score of 26324 placing it competitively. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187 (0.5% behind). These tight deltas suggest the CPU provides consistent mid-range processing power.
The GPU's percentile ranking of 59 places it slightly above average, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals show similar performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129 (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 (1% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852 (1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679 (2.1% behind). The GPU's performance aligns closely with these competitors, confirming its mid-range positioning.
The combo's overall rank of 2179 out of 3712 suggests that while neither component is exceptional, their combination delivers adequate performance for Minimum. The 1080p results—particularly the 92 FPS average at Ultra—demonstrate that this pairing is well-suited for the game's demands at standard resolutions, even if it does not lead the pack in absolute performance.