Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

61%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
214 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
105 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
7.3ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,852

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 48 57 74
1440p QHD 68 89 106 138
1080p Full HD 105 137 164 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 137
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 164
1920x1080 Ultra 105
2560x1440 High 89
2560x1440 Low 138
2560x1440 Medium 106
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

Measured on real hardware, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a broad spread of frame rates in Minimum, a third-person shooter released on June 25, 2014. The data covers three resolutions — 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 — across four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), and the pattern that emerges is one of comfortable performance at 1080p and 1440p with a hard ceiling at 4K. This pairing ranks 1717 out of 3712 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the middle of the field. What follows is a resolution-by-resolution reading of what the numbers actually mean for playability, judged against a 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Starting at 1920x1080, the combo scales from 214 FPS at Low up through 164 FPS at Medium, 137 FPS at High, and 105 FPS at Ultra. Even the most demanding preset clears 100 FPS on average. The Medium preset is the only configuration with minimum and maximum frame-time data recorded at this resolution: it never dipped below 139 FPS and peaked at 188 FPS. That minimum figure matters — it sits well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, meaning the average isn't masking uncomfortable drops. The spread between Medium's minimum of 139 and maximum of 188 is roughly a 49-frame band, which suggests relatively stable delivery rather than wide stutter-inducing swings.

At 2560x1440, the numbers step down predictably: 138 FPS at Low, 106 at Medium, 89 at High, and 68 at Ultra. Every preset still clears 60 FPS on average. Medium again is the one preset with min/max data: a floor of 90 FPS and a ceiling of 121. That floor is higher than the 4K average at Low, which contextualizes how much headroom remains at 1440p. The Ultra result of 68 FPS is only an eight-frame cushion above the threshold, so it works, but it's the tightest margin at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes sharply. Low averages 74 FPS, Medium 57, High 48, and Ultra 36. Only Low clears 60 FPS. Medium's recorded range is 48 minimum to 65 maximum — the average of 57 sits below the threshold, and the maximum of 65 barely pokes above it, confirming that even the best moments at 4K Medium barely reach playable territory. High at 48 and Ultra at 36 fall well short. The GPU is clearly the component running out of room here; a 2014 title being unable to sustain 60 FPS at 4K Medium on this hardware points squarely at pixel throughput, not the CPU, since the same CPU posts 214 FPS at 1080p Low.

Comparing the top and bottom of the stack: 1080p Ultra (105 FPS) exceeds 4K High (48 FPS) by a wide margin, and 1440p Ultra (68) is nearly double 4K Ultra (36). Frame rate roughly halves when moving from 1440p to 4K at the Ultra preset — the signature of a GPU-bound scenario.

Best Settings per Resolution

The best settings — the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS average — break down as follows:

  • 1920x1080: Ultra, at 105 FPS average. A comfortable 45-frame margin over the threshold.
  • 2560x1440: Ultra, at 68 FPS average. Playable, but the margin thins to 8 frames; Medium at 106 FPS or High at 89 FPS offer sturdier alternatives if consistency is the priority.
  • 3840x2160: Low, at 74 FPS average. Medium at 57 FPS misses the cutoff by three frames.

The verdict data confirms this: at 4K, only Low appears in the playable settings list, while at both 1080p and 1440p all four presets qualify. It's worth questioning whether 4K Low is actually preferable to 1440p Ultra — both land in the same general frame-rate neighborhood (74 versus 68), and the latter preserves visual detail. The data can't answer that trade-off directly, but the raw numbers make it a legitimate option.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling evidence points to a GPU-bound game at higher resolutions and a CPU headroom-rich one at 1080p. Consider the Low preset across resolutions: 214, 138, and 74 FPS. That steep decline with rising pixel count, while the Ryzen 5 7600 sits constant, indicates the RX 7700's rendering throughput is the limiter at 1440p and especially 4K.

At the other end, the fact that 1080p Low reaches 214 FPS tells us the CPU isn't capping the experience anywhere below that figure. The Ryzen 5 7600 — a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and a single-thread Passmark score of 3910 — sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, and a 2014 third-person shooter is well within its comfort zone. The preset scaling at 1080p (214 down to 105, roughly halving from Low to Ultra) mirrors the resolution scaling, again consistent with GPU-side rendering cost driving the differences.

Practically: at 1080p and 1440p, upgrading the GPU would raise frame rates; upgrading the CPU would not. At 4K, the RX 7700 is the component to scrutinize.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For CPUs, the Ryzen 5 7600's nearest rivals are remarkably close in average benchmark score — its 26324 average sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274, 0.2% apart), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26402, -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212, 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187, 0.5%). Any of these processors would behave near-identically as a CPU partner for this game, though given the GPU-bound character at higher resolutions, even wider CPU differences would likely go unnoticed here.

For GPUs, the RX 7700 (average score 15852, 58th percentile among GPUs) has rivals that are similarly tight: the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (-1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-1.7%). The RX 9060 and RTX 3060 Ti both score slightly higher, so they'd be expected to nudge the 4K Medium result closer to — possibly over — the 60 FPS line. The W5500, scoring lower, would push in the opposite direction. These are marginal shifts, though; the 1440p experience would be essentially unchanged across all of them.

FAQ

Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 7700 run Minimum at 4K with high settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160, High averages 48 FPS and Ultra averages 36 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low (74 FPS) clears it.

Q: What frame rate does this combo get at 1080p Ultra?

A: 105 FPS average — the strongest result relative to the threshold of any Ultra configuration tested, with a 45-frame cushion above 60 FPS.

Q: Does the frame rate ever drop below 60 FPS at 1440p Medium?

A: No. The recorded minimum at 2560x1440 Medium is 90 FPS, with a maximum of 121 against an average of 106.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU more important for this game?

A: The GPU. Frame rates fall sharply as resolution rises (214 FPS at 1080p Low versus 74 FPS at 4K Low) while the CPU stays constant, indicating the RX 7700's rendering throughput is the limiter at 1440p and 4K.

Q: How close is 4K Medium to being playable?

A: Very close on average — 57 FPS, three frames short of the threshold — but the recorded maximum of 65 FPS shows even peak moments barely exceed it, and the minimum of 48 sits well below.

Q: Where does this hardware pairing rank among tested combos for this game?

A: Rank 1717 of 3712 tested combinations — just below the midpoint of the field.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Minimum — with one qualification. At 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, every preset from Low through Ultra clears 60 FPS: 1080p tops out at Ultra 105 FPS, and 1440p at Ultra 68 FPS, with Medium (106 FPS) and High (89 FPS) providing safer margins at the latter. At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low at 74 FPS; Medium (57), High (48), and Ultra (36) all fall short. Players targeting 4K will need to accept reduced visual settings or step down to 1440p, where the full preset range remains on the table.

How This Combo Ranks

Within this game's database, the Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 7700 combination ranks 1717 out of 3712 tested configurations. That places it slightly below the middle of the field — a position consistent with the measured results: dominant at 1080p and 1440p relative to the 60 FPS bar, but constrained at 4K. The RX 7700's 58th percentile standing among GPUs tracks closely with this combo's mid-pack rank, reinforcing the reading that the graphics card, not the Ryzen 5 7600, sets the ceiling for this pairing in Minimum.