Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 39 | 49 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 70 | 88 | 113 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 107 | 133 | 171 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, but 4K gaming is out of reach at playable settings. The data shows this pairing is well-balanced for the game's demands, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions while the CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 5 7600 sits in a tight cluster of processors with nearly identical average benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score of 26324 places it within 0.5% of its nearest rivals, making real-world performance differences negligible for gaming. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (average score 26274) is just 0.2% slower, while the Intel Core i9-11900KF (average score 26212) trails by 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (average score 26402) is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (average score 26187) is 0.5% slower. For Minimum, any of these processors would deliver effectively identical frame rates, meaning users upgrading from these chips would see no measurable improvement.
On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15171 puts it in a similar tight grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (average score 15199) is 0.2% faster, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (average score 15082) lags by 0.6%. The AMD Radeon 680M (average score 15270) leads by 0.7%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (average score 15063) trails by 0.7%. These deltas are within measurement noise, so users with any of these GPUs should expect comparable performance in Minimum at the same settings and resolution. The RX 7600's percentile ranking of 57 among all GPUs and the CPU's percentile of 78 among all CPUs indicate the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, which aligns with the observed bottleneck behavior at higher resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results reveal a clear shift in component importance as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role relative to the GPU, as evidenced by the substantial frame rate headroom. The transition from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p shows a 83.7 FPS drop (from 170.7 to 87.0), with the GPU handling increased graphical load while the CPU maintains consistent feeding of frames. The Ryzen 5 7600's single-thread score of 999 in 3dmark and 3910 in Passmark single-thread tests provides sufficient processing power to avoid limiting the RX 7600 at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more influential. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a 37.3 FPS reduction (from 107.4 to 70.1), a 34.7% decrease. This drop accelerates at Ultra settings, where the 1440p average of 55.9 FPS is 31.1 FPS below the 1080p Ultra result of 87.0. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth begin to show limitations at this resolution, particularly at Ultra where the frame rate falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost entirely the limiting factor. The RX 7600's 128-bit memory bus and 2048 shading units struggle to maintain performance, with even Low settings yielding only 57.6 FPS average. The CPU's contribution becomes minimal, as the GPU renders frames too slowly for processor speed to matter. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (30.4 FPS) is less than half of what the same settings achieve at 1080p (87.0 FPS), demonstrating the GPU's dominant role at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RX 7600 delivers playable performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 170.7 FPS, Medium achieves 132.6 FPS, High reaches 107.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 87.0 FPS. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold with comfortable margins, with even the most demanding Ultra setting providing 45% more frames than required.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU's growing strain. Low settings yield 113.1 FPS average, Medium drops to 88.0 FPS, High manages 70.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55.9 FPS. The High preset is the most demanding setting that maintains at least 60 FPS, while Ultra fails to reach the playable threshold by 4.1 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the RX 7600 cannot sustain playable frame rates at any setting. Low produces 57.6 FPS average, just 2.4 FPS below the 60 FPS target. Medium drops to 48.5 FPS, High falls to 38.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 30.4 FPS. The performance degradation from Low to Ultra at 4K is 27.2 FPS, indicating the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are severely taxed at this resolution.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum successfully at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160. The verdict data confirms that all four presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 87.0 FPS average. At 1440p, three of four settings are playable, with High being the most demanding option that maintains at least 60 FPS at 70.1 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls short at 55.9 FPS, and 4K is unplayable at any setting, with the best case being Low at 57.6 FPS.
The combination's rank of 2474 out of 3712 tested combos places it in the 33rd percentile overall for this game, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested system configurations deliver higher frame rates. However, this ranking reflects all resolutions combined, and the system's 1080p performance is genuinely strong. The data indicates the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface become limiting factors at 4K, where the game requires more memory bandwidth than the card can provide at playable settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 87.0 FPS. This represents the maximum visual quality available while retaining playable performance, offering 27 FPS of headroom above the threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, achieving 70.1 FPS average. This provides 10.1 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS minimum, representing the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls below the threshold at 55.9 FPS, so users seeking maximum quality at 1440p would need to accept this sub-60 FPS performance or reduce resolution.
At 3840x2160, no settings are playable according to the verdict data. The closest option is Low at 57.6 FPS, but this still fails the 60 FPS criterion by 2.4 FPS. Users targeting 4K would need to consider a more powerful GPU, as the RX 7600 cannot deliver playable frame rates at this resolution regardless of settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2474th out of 3712 tested combinations for Minimum, placing it in the lower third of all systems tested. This ranking reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions rather than the CPU's capabilities. The processor's percentile of 78 among all CPUs indicates strong relative performance, while the GPU's percentile of 57 shows it sits near the median of all graphics cards tested.
The measured data reveals that this combination performs best at 1080p, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3910) and the GPU's adequate compute power (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) combine effectively. The rank would likely improve significantly if only 1080p results were considered, as the system's frame rates at this resolution are competitive with many higher-ranked configurations. However, the inclusion of 1440p and 4K results drags down the overall ranking, particularly the 4K performance where even Low settings fail to reach 60 FPS.
The nearest rival combinations, based on individual component similarities, would likely produce nearly identical rankings. The CPU's 0.2% delta from the Ryzen 9 6900HX and the GPU's 0.2% delta from the RTX 3050 OEM suggest that systems using these near-identical components would cluster closely in the rankings. The system's overall ranking of 2474 out of 3712 indicates that while it is not a top-tier performer for Minimum, it remains capable of delivering smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, which aligns with the measured data showing playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p for most settings.