Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
373 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
197 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
260 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
127 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
69 FPS
3.9ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 90 107 140
1440p QHD 127 167 199 260
1080p Full HD 197 259 309 373

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 259
1920x1080 Low 373
1920x1080 Medium 309
1920x1080 Ultra 197
2560x1440 High 167
2560x1440 Low 260
2560x1440 Medium 199
2560x1440 Ultra 127
3840x2160 High 90
3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 107
3840x2160 Ultra 69

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is an exceptionally high-performing combination for Minimum, clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution and preset tested. The data shows that this combo ranks 105th out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the top percentile of systems capable of running this title. At 4K, the system delivers a playable 69 FPS average on Ultra settings, while at 1440p and 1080p, it achieves 127 and 197 FPS respectively on the same maximum preset. This is not a system that struggles with Minimum; it is one that overwhelms it, providing headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions and comfortable 4K gameplay with all visual features enabled.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark results indicate that this combination can run Minimum at the highest possible preset—Ultra—at every resolution tested, with all average frame rates remaining comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the Ultra preset delivers an average of 69 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and while 69 FPS is above the playable threshold, it offers less headroom than lower resolutions. For players who prioritize maximum visual fidelity at 4K, Ultra is viable, but the data suggests that dropping to High increases the average to 90 FPS, providing a more substantial buffer against frame time spikes. The Medium preset at 4K yields 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS, which is the only settings tier at any resolution where min/max data was captured.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the Ultra preset averages 127 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution represents the sweet spot for this combination, as it delivers high visual quality while maintaining frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The High preset at 1440p reaches 167 FPS, while Medium averages 199 FPS with a minimum of 169 FPS and maximum of 229 FPS. Even the Low preset, which is not typically recommended for visual quality, achieves 260 FPS, making it suitable for competitive play on high-refresh-rate displays.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset averages 197 FPS. This is the highest average frame rate at the maximum quality settings across all resolutions. The High preset reaches 259 FPS, Medium averages 309 FPS with a minimum of 262 FPS and maximum of 355 FPS, and Low achieves 373 FPS. At this resolution, the system is overwhelmingly capable, with even the most demanding preset delivering frame rates that exceed 144Hz refresh rate monitors.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data provides context for how this specific CPU and GPU compare to other hardware in their respective benchmark categories. For the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, the average benchmark score is 44573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The closest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600, which scores 44889, representing a 0.7% higher average score. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 0.2% behind with a score of 44466, while the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, a 0.5% deficit. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, which is 0.6% lower. These deltaPct values are minimal, indicating that all four rival CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minimum.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, the average benchmark score is 79842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, which scores 80959, a 1.4% higher result. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, just 0.3% lower, while the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, which is 1.1% lower. These rival GPUs would produce frame rates in Minimum that are statistically indistinguishable from the RTX 5090, given the small deltaPct values.

In practical terms, a system using any of these rival CPUs paired with any of these rival GPUs would behave nearly identically to the tested combination in Minimum. The performance differences are within 1.4% at most, which translates to a frame rate variance of only a few FPS at the measured settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 373 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded in the entire dataset. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 309 FPS, with a minimum of 262 FPS and a maximum of 355 FPS. High settings reduce the average to 259 FPS, while Ultra drops further to 197 FPS. All 1080p results exceed 190 FPS, demonstrating that the system is never CPU-limited at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 260 FPS, Medium averages 199 FPS with a minimum of 169 FPS and maximum of 229 FPS, High averages 167 FPS, and Ultra averages 127 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a consistent reduction in frame rates, with each settings tier reducing performance by approximately 20-30% relative to the previous tier. The minimum FPS at Medium (169) remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating stable frame delivery.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 140 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS, High averages 90 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset approaches the playable threshold, with the 69 FPS average providing a 9 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS minimum. The Medium preset at 4K, with its 91 FPS minimum, is the most consistent performer at this resolution in terms of frame pacing.

The Verdict

The verdictByResolution data is unambiguous: this PC can run Minimum at every resolution and preset combination tested, with all average frame rates exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Ultra, with an average of 69 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, achieving 127 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 197 FPS.

The 4K Ultra result of 69 FPS is the only measurement that falls below 90 FPS, making it the most demanding scenario. However, it still clears the playable threshold by a meaningful margin. For players who own 4K displays with VRR (variable refresh rate) support, the 69 FPS average would appear smooth, though the lack of min/max data for Ultra at 4K means frame consistency at this setting is not fully documented. The Medium preset at 4K, with its documented 91 FPS minimum, offers a more predictable experience for users who prioritize frame stability over maximum visual quality.

At 1440p and 1080p, the system provides substantial headroom. The 127 FPS and 197 FPS averages at Ultra settings respectively indicate that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at these resolutions. The data shows that the system is never the bottleneck at these settings, as the frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings changes.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum playable settings preset at 4K resolution?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 3840x2160, with an average frame rate of 69 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the system perform at 1440p Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 127 FPS, more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate is 373 FPS, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Does the system maintain frame rates above 60 FPS at all times?

A: Yes, all measured average frame rates across every resolution and settings preset exceed 60 FPS, with the lowest average being 69 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, which is 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600 (44889), the closest rival with a higher score.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79842.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame data places this AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination at rank 105 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum. This ranking puts the system in the top 2.8% of all tested hardware configurations, which is consistent with the measured frame rates showing playable performance at every resolution and preset.

The rank reflects the combined capability of both components. The CPU's 89th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 92nd percentile standing among all graphics cards contribute to this high overall ranking. The system's ability to maintain 69 FPS at 4K Ultra, where many combinations would fail to reach 60 FPS, is a direct result of this hardware pairing's strength.

Given the measured data, this combination would be considered an enthusiast-tier setup for Minimum. The rank of 105 indicates that only 104 other tested combinations outperform it, and the performance gap between this system and those above it is likely minimal, given the high frame rates already achieved. For players seeking maximum visual quality at 4K or extremely high frame rates at lower resolutions, this combination delivers results that place it among the top performers in the database.