Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 51 | 66 | 79 | 103 |
| 1440p QHD | 94 | 123 | 147 | 192 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 191 | 228 | 297 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 clears every reasonable bar in Minimum, a third-person shooter released in mid-2014. The data shows this combination is massively overqualified for the title: even at 4K on the Ultra preset it delivers 51 FPS on average, and at every resolution from 1080p upward the Medium preset or better stays comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The short verdict is that the pairing runs the game without compromise at 1440p and below, and with only a single preset sacrificed at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits in the 89th percentile of all tested processors with an average benchmark score of 44573. Its nearest rivals are clustered remarkably tightly. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H averages 44466, a delta of just 0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-13950HX averages 44342, 0.5% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is 0.6% off at 44309. The only rival ahead of it is the Intel Core i5-14600 at 44889, which outruns it by 0.7%. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver effectively identical behaviour in Minimum — the spread across all four rivals is within a single percentage point, and a game of this vintage is far more sensitive to the GPU than to differences at this level of CPU performance.
The RTX 5070 occupies the 82nd percentile among GPUs with an average benchmark score of 40377. Its closest comparable is the AMD Radeon Pro 580 at 40318, a gap of only 0.1%, followed by the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40063 (0.8% behind) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40870, which is actually 1.2% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile trails by 2% at 39568. Anyone running one of these alternatives alongside a comparable CPU should expect frame rates within a few percent of the numbers recorded here, since the measured scores fall within that band.
CPU and GPU Roles
Benchmark results indicate this game is GPU-bound at every tested resolution with this pairing. The evidence is in the scaling. Moving from 1080p to 1440p drops the Ultra average from 146 FPS to 94 FPS, and 4K Ultra falls further to 51 FPS. From 1080p to 4K at Ultra, that is a loss of roughly two-thirds of the frame rate — a pattern that only occurs when the graphics card is the limiting factor, since a CPU bottleneck would cap frame rates identically regardless of resolution.
The Low preset tells the same story from the other direction. At 1080p Low the combo averages 297 FPS, which slides to 192 FPS at 1440p and 103 FPS at 4K. If the Ryzen 5 7500X3D were the constraint, those high-refresh numbers would flatten out as resolution increased; instead they scale almost linearly with pixel count. The CPU contributes a PassMark single-thread score of 3494 and a multithread score of 25047, both more than sufficient for a 2014 title, but the data shows the RTX 5070's 6144 shading units and 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput doing the decisive work. Preset changes matter too: at 4K, stepping from Low (103 FPS) to Medium (79 FPS) to High (66 FPS) costs roughly a third of the frame rate, confirming that visual settings tax the GPU rather than the processor.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum, this pairing ranks 786th. That placement deserves context: the ranking reflects that this is a very fast pairing in a game where enormous numbers of combinations can hit the engine's ceiling. A rank in the top quarter of more than three and a half thousand configurations is strong, and the measured results back it up — every resolution and preset combination tested produces an average above 50 FPS, and eleven of the twelve recorded averages exceed 60 FPS. Only 4K Ultra, at 51 FPS, sits below the playable threshold. Given that the RTX 5070 alone ranks in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs and the Ryzen 5 7500X3D in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, the combination's standing is consistent with the quality of its components rather than any special optimization for this specific title.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7500X3D and RTX 5070 run Minimum at 4K?
A: Yes, at three of four presets. At 3840x2160 the pairing averages 103 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium, and 66 FPS on High — all above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Ultra falls short, at 51 FPS.
Q: What is the best-looking setting that stays playable at each resolution?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, Ultra is fully playable, averaging 146 FPS and 94 FPS respectively. At 4K, High is the best playable preset at 66 FPS.
Q: How high does the frame rate go on this hardware?
A: The highest recorded average is 297 FPS at 1920x1080 on the Low preset. Even at 4K Low, the combo sustains 103 FPS on average.
Q: Are frame time dips a concern?
A: The measured min/max data suggests no. At 1440p Medium, the average of 147 FPS spans a minimum of 125 to a maximum of 169 — a tight band. At 4K Medium, the range is 67 to 91 around an average of 79.
Q: Is this game CPU-heavy or GPU-heavy with this combo?
A: GPU-heavy. Frame rates scale sharply with resolution — Ultra drops from 146 FPS at 1080p to 51 FPS at 4K — indicating the RTX 5070 is the limiting component, not the Ryzen 5 7500X3D.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to rival GPUs in database scores?
A: Its average benchmark score of 40377 places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318), 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063), and 2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568), while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870) by 1.2%.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the results are uniformly strong. Low averages 297 FPS, Medium averages 228 FPS with a minimum of 193 and a maximum of 262, High averages 191 FPS, and Ultra averages 146 FPS. Every preset at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold many times over.
At 2560x1440, Low averages 192 FPS. Medium averages 147 FPS, holding a floor of 125 and peaking at 169. High averages 123 FPS, and Ultra averages 94 FPS. All four presets remain playable, with even the most demanding setting leaving more than thirty frames of headroom above the threshold.
At 3840x2160, Low averages 103 FPS and Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. High averages 66 FPS — playable, but with limited margin. Ultra averages 51 FPS and is the sole sub-60 result in the entire dataset. The 4K Medium figures are the most instructive for consistency: a minimum of 67 against an average of 79 means the worst moments still stay above the playable line, which is the definition of a stable experience.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the answer is Ultra at 146 FPS average. There is no reason to lower a single setting at this resolution; the frame rate exceeds the playable threshold by a wide margin.
At 2560x1440, Ultra again qualifies, averaging 94 FPS. High at 123 FPS is the fallback for anyone chasing higher refresh rates, but Ultra is fully playable as measured.
At 3840x2160, High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging exactly 66 FPS. Players wanting additional headroom at 4K can drop to Medium for 79 FPS, while Ultra at 51 FPS sits below the threshold and is the only preset to avoid at this resolution.