Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 79 | 95 | 124 |
| 1440p QHD | 112 | 148 | 176 | 230 |
| 1080p Full HD | 174 | 229 | 273 | 356 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is an exceptionally powerful combination for Minimum, delivering playable frame rates at every preset and resolution tested. The data shows this combo achieves its highest playable average of 174 FPS at 1080p Ultra, and even at the demanding 4K Ultra setting, it maintains an average of 61 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The data places this combination at rank 246 out of 3,712 tested combos for Minimum, putting it in the top 6.6% of all configurations. This is a dominant standing, reflecting the strength of both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's overall benchmark percentile is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of all tested processors, while the GPU holds an 86th percentile ranking against all tested graphics cards. These high individual percentiles translate directly into a top-tier gaming combination.
The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,573, which places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It sits just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44,342). The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 trails by 0.6% with a score of 44,309, while the Intel Core i5-14600 is the only rival in the group that scores higher, at 44,889, which is 0.7% above the 7500X3D. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the 7500X3D's performance is essentially on par with several high-end mobile and desktop CPUs.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54,247 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54,209, a difference of just 0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698) and AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757) score 2.6% and 2.7% higher respectively. While these AMD cards show higher raw benchmark scores, the RTX 4080's measured in-game performance for Minimum is what matters most here, and it is exceptional.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes. The data shows all four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 3840x2160. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still achieves an average of 61 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: What is the best setting to use at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, as it delivers an average of 112 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for the highest visual quality without sacrificing smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its immediate rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44,573. This is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX, but 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600, which scores 44,889.
Q: Is the RTX 4080 significantly faster than the RTX 4080 SUPER?
A: The benchmark data shows they are virtually identical. The RTX 4080's average score is 54,247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, a negligible difference of 0.1%.
Q: What is the least demanding setting tested at 1080p?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 produces the highest average frame rate of 356 FPS. This is the least demanding setting, offering the maximum possible performance for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded across all tests?
A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 61 FPS, which occurs at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset. This is the only tested configuration that falls below the 100 FPS mark, but it still meets the playability threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four quality settings.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the average frame rates scale from 124 FPS on Low to 61 FPS on Ultra. The Low setting averages 124 FPS, while Medium delivers 95 FPS with a minimum of 80 and a maximum of 109. High settings produce an average of 79 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 61 FPS. All 4K presets stay at or above the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p) reveals a substantial performance uplift. The Low preset averages 230 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K Low score. Medium averages 176 FPS with a minimum of 149 and a maximum of 202. High settings reach an average of 148 FPS, and the Ultra preset delivers a robust 112 FPS. Every setting at this resolution offers a high-performance experience.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination is exceptionally fast. The Low preset generates an average of 356 FPS, while Medium averages 273 FPS with a minimum of 232 and a maximum of 313. High settings produce an average of 229 FPS, and even the Ultra preset achieves an average of 174 FPS. This resolution is clearly where the hardware is most at home, providing frame rates that can take full advantage of high-refresh-rate displays.
The Verdict
The benchmark results indicate this PC can absolutely run Minimum with exceptional headroom. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra averaging 174 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings are also playable, with Ultra averaging 112 FPS. At 3840x2160, the combination still manages to clear the 60 FPS threshold on every preset, including the most demanding Ultra setting, which averages 61 FPS. This means the user has the freedom to choose maximum visual quality at any resolution without dropping below the playable threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark performance are the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Core i9-13950HX, AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, and Intel Core i5-14600. These processors all score within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's average score of 44,573. A system with any of these CPUs would be expected to deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, assuming the same GPU is used.
For the GPU, the closest alternatives are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and AMD Radeon 8060S. The RTX 4080 SUPER is effectively a match, with a score just 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 1.1% higher, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE and Radeon 8060S score 2.6% and 2.7% higher respectively. These GPUs would provide comparable or slightly higher raw compute performance, though the in-game FPS could vary based on driver optimizations for Minimum.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is the Ultra setting for all three tested resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 61 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality available while still meeting the playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 112 FPS, offering a high level of visual fidelity with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS floor.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 174 FPS, providing the highest quality experience with a frame rate that is nearly triple the playability threshold. This is the optimal configuration for a smooth and visually rich experience.