Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
267 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
131 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
84 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
5.8ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 60 71 93
1440p QHD 84 110 132 172
1080p Full HD 131 171 204 267

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 171
1920x1080 Low 267
1920x1080 Medium 204
1920x1080 Ultra 131
2560x1440 High 110
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 132
2560x1440 Ultra 84
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 71
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a robust experience in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in June 2014. Measured data shows this pairing produces smooth frame rates across most settings, with the caveat that 4K Ultra dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and ranking relative to other tested configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly fast. Low settings deliver an average of 267 FPS, while Medium averages 204 FPS with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 235 FPS. High settings average 171 FPS, and even Ultra maintains an average of 131 FPS. Every 1080p preset stays far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that the RTX 3080 has significant headroom at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down predictably. Low settings average 172 FPS, Medium averages 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 151 FPS, and High averages 110 FPS. Ultra settings still clear the playable bar with an average of 84 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is substantial; for example, the Ultra preset drops from 131 FPS to 84 FPS, a reduction of roughly 36%. This indicates the GPU is the primary driver of frame rate changes when pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes. Low settings average 93 FPS, Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, and High averages exactly 60 FPS. Ultra settings, however, fall below the playable threshold with an average of 45 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 60 FPS is notable—it means even the worst-case frame time at that setting just touches the playable line. High at 4K also averages exactly 60 FPS, which is technically playable but leaves no margin for drops. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is the only combination where this hardware fails to maintain playable performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant performance factor in Minimum, particularly as resolution increases. The scaling between 1080p and 1440p shows a consistent performance drop across all settings—Low goes from 267 to 172 FPS, Medium from 204 to 132 FPS, High from 171 to 110 FPS, and Ultra from 131 to 84 FPS. This roughly 35-40% reduction in average FPS aligns with the increased pixel count, which places more load on the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 8704 shading units. The CPU's role is less pronounced at higher resolutions, as the bottleneck shifts away from the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 6 cores and 12 threads.

At 1080p, the CPU's influence becomes more apparent. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz and 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps maintain high minimum FPS in CPU-bound scenarios. However, even at 1080p Ultra, the average of 131 FPS suggests the GPU is still the limiting factor—the CPU is likely not maxed out given the high frame rates. The 7500X3D's PassMark multithread score of 25047 and single-thread score of 3494 indicate strong per-core performance, but Minimum appears to be a title that scales mostly with GPU throughput.

The transition from Medium to High settings at each resolution provides further insight. At 1440p, Medium averages 132 FPS while High averages 110 FPS, a 17% drop. At 4K, Medium averages 71 FPS while High averages 60 FPS, a 15% drop. This consistent reduction suggests that the High preset introduces additional GPU work (likely more complex shading or lighting) without heavily taxing the CPU. The Ultra preset, however, shows a sharper decline—from High's 60 FPS to Ultra's 45 FPS at 4K—which indicates a significant increase in GPU load that the RTX 3080 cannot fully handle.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 1051 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper third of all configurations. The percentile data for the individual components helps contextualize this ranking. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44573. The RTX 3080, meanwhile, ranks at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 23172. The combo ranking of 1051 suggests that the GPU's lower percentile drags the overall position down, despite the CPU's strong showing.

The nearest CPU rivals to the 7500X3D include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (avg score 44466, delta 0.2%), the Intel Core i9-13950HX (avg score 44342, delta 0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (avg score 44309, delta 0.6%). These are all within 0.6% of the 7500X3D's score, indicating that swapping to any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical performance in Minimum if the GPU remained the same. The Intel Core i5-14600 is slightly ahead at 44889 (delta -0.7%), meaning it would be marginally faster, though the difference is negligible in real-world FPS.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 3080 are the NVIDIA P106-100 (avg score 23249, delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (avg score 23250, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (avg score 23273, delta -0.4%). These scores are all within 0.4% of the RTX 3080, which is surprising given that these are not equivalent hardware in terms of memory bandwidth or compute units. The small deltas suggest that for Minimum's workload, these GPUs would behave similarly, though the RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance should theoretically give it an edge in more demanding titles.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this PC can run Minimum at playable frame rates in nearly every scenario. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest average being Ultra at 131 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same holds true—Ultra averages 84 FPS, comfortably above the line. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Medium, and Low, with High averaging exactly 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only unplayable option, averaging 45 FPS.

The best settings per resolution, based on the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, are as follows: at 4K, High settings with an average of 60 FPS; at 1440p, Ultra settings with an average of 84 FPS; at 1080p, Ultra settings with an average of 131 FPS. For players seeking a consistent 60+ FPS experience, the 4K High preset is the ceiling—it hits exactly 60 FPS, so any additional overhead would be consumed by demanding scenes. The Medium preset at 4K provides a safer margin with a 71 FPS average and a 60 FPS minimum, making it the more stable choice for locked 60 FPS gameplay.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: High settings are the highest playable preset at 4K, averaging 60 FPS. Ultra falls below the threshold at 45 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 maintain 60 FPS minimums at 1440p?

A: Yes. The Medium preset at 2560x1440 has a minimum of 112 FPS, and all other presets (Low, High, Ultra) average above 84 FPS, well above the 60 FPS floor.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 1440p for this combo?

A: At Low settings, 1080p averages 267 FPS versus 172 FPS at 1440p, which is about 55% faster. At Ultra, 1080p averages 131 FPS versus 84 FPS, roughly 56% faster.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck at 4K Ultra?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The RTX 3080 cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra (45 FPS average), while the CPU's strong benchmark scores suggest it is not the constraint.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500X3D a top-tier CPU for this game?

A: It ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 44573. Its nearest rivals are within 0.7% in performance, so it is a very capable processor for Minimum.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p Medium?

A: The measured average is 204 FPS, with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 235 FPS, providing excellent smoothness for high-refresh-rate displays.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 60 FPS. If you prefer a safety margin, Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, making it the better choice for avoiding dips. At 2560x1440, Ultra is the best preset, averaging 84 FPS—this gives you the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS line by a healthy margin. At 1920x1080, Ultra also takes the top spot, averaging 131 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold and leaves ample headroom for demanding scenes or background tasks.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D suggest that several CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Minimum. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Core i9-13950HX, and AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 all have average scores within 0.6% of the 7500X3D, meaning a system with any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 3080 would produce FPS results within a few frames of what is measured here. The Intel Core i5-14600 is marginally faster (delta -0.7%), so it might push 4K High from 60 FPS to 61 or 62 FPS, though this is within measurement error.

For the GPU side, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, all with average scores within 0.4% of the RTX 3080. This is a surprising outcome, as these GPUs have vastly different specifications—the RX 6600M is a mobile part with less memory bandwidth, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a workstation product. The data implies that in Minimum, these GPUs would produce very similar frame rates to the RTX 3080, likely because the game's workload does not fully utilize the RTX 3080's advanced features like ray tracing or DLSS. For players considering alternatives, any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU would land in the same performance ballpark, though the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM and 320-bit bus give it more headroom for other games.