Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
165 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
57 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 37 44 57
1440p QHD 52 68 81 106
1080p Full HD 81 106 126 165

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 165
1920x1080 Medium 126
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 106
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination for running Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014. The data is measured, not estimated, and the performance is judged against a 60 FPS playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for this CPU-GPU pairing show a clear resolution scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers performance well above the 60 FPS threshold across all tested presets. The Low preset averages 165 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium yields an average of 126 FPS, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS. The High preset averages 106 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a solid 81 FPS average. None of the 1080p results dip below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating a very comfortable experience at this resolution.

Stepping up to 2560x1440 introduces some limitations. The Low preset averages 106 FPS, matching the 1080p High result. Medium averages 81 FPS, with a recorded range between 69 FPS minimum and 93 FPS maximum. High settings average 68 FPS, which remains above the playability threshold but leaves less headroom. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to a 52 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS target. The data shows that 1440p is playable up to High settings, but the margin at High is slim—only 8 FPS above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. The Low preset averages 57 FPS, just 3 FPS short of the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 44 FPS, with a minimum of 37 FPS and a maximum of 50 FPS. High settings drop to 37 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS. None of the 4K presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, so this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay with this hardware combination. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 13 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra is 9 FPS, showing that each settings tier carries a meaningful performance cost at this resolution.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 1080p with all settings maxed out?*

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 81 FPS, which is 21 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the highest settings preset available and it remains fully playable.

Q: What is the best playable settings preset at 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 68 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium and Low also clear the threshold, averaging 81 FPS and 106 FPS respectively, but High is the highest preset that remains playable.

Q: Is 4K resolution viable for this game with this hardware?

A: No. Every preset at 3840x2160 falls below the 60 FPS target. The closest result is the Low preset at 57 FPS, which is 3 FPS short. Medium, High, and Ultra average 44 FPS, 37 FPS, and 28 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, which is 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: What is the CPU's standing relative to other processors in the benchmark database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score is 44573. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, scores 44466, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i9-13950HX and AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 score 44342 and 44309 respectively, both within 0.6%. The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889, which is 0.7% higher.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU present a bottleneck for 4K performance?

A: The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The Arc B580 ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile. At 4K, even the Low preset only reaches 57 FPS, and the GPU has a PassMark G3D score of 15748. The combination's rank of 2790 out of 3712 tested combos for this game suggests the GPU holds back the system at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components helps identify hardware that would behave similarly in this game. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, a negligible 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, both within 0.6% of the 7500X3D. The Intel Core i5-14600 is slightly ahead at 44889, a 0.7% margin. Any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, since the game's CPU demands are easily met by all of them.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP is essentially tied at 23061, a 0.2% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These four cards bracket the Arc B580's performance so closely that in a game like Minimum, which is not heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions, swapping to any of them would change frame rates by only a few percent. The RTX 3080 would be marginally faster, and the RTX 2080 marginally slower, but the overall playability verdict would remain unchanged at every resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific case of Minimum, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2790 out of 3712 tested combos. That places it in the lower portion of the database, roughly in the 25th percentile of all tested pairings for this title. The rank is driven primarily by the GPU's position relative to other tested cards, since the CPU is in the 89th percentile overall. The Arc B580's 68th percentile GPU ranking means many other graphics cards outperform it, and those faster GPUs paired with similarly capable CPUs will land higher in the combo ranking. The measured frame rates confirm this: the combo clears 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p with most presets, but it cannot handle 4K at all. This rank of 2790 suggests that while the system is fully functional for this game at common resolutions, it is far from the top of the performance chart. The data shows a wide gap between this combo and the best-performing systems, which would achieve higher frame rates at 4K. For a game from 2014, the absolute performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the ranking reflects that many other hardware combinations deliver more headroom.

The Verdict

The measured data provides a clear answer: this PC can run Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 81 FPS, which is well above the playability line. At 2560x1440, the Low, Medium, and High presets are playable, with High averaging 68 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls short at 52 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best result is Low at 57 FPS, and the worst is Ultra at 28 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1440p High is the most demanding playable setting, and 1080p Ultra is fully playable. If you are targeting 4K, this hardware will not deliver a smooth experience in Minimum, regardless of settings. For 1080p or 1440p gaming, the system provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target with the right preset selection.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for this system are determined by the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 81 FPS, making it the best choice. This is the highest quality setting and it still provides 21 FPS of headroom above the threshold. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 68 FPS, which is the most demanding option that stays playable. The Medium preset averages 81 FPS and Low averages 106 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The Low preset comes closest at 57 FPS, but it still falls short. The verdict data lists no playable settings at this resolution, and the best settings field is null, confirming that 4K is not viable. For the best experience, run the game at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings for maximum quality, or at 2560x1440 with High settings for a balance of resolution and visual fidelity.