Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 19 | 23 | 30 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 35 | 42 | 55 |
| 1080p Full HD | 42 | 55 | 65 | 85 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B370 struggles across every preset. The highest recorded average is 30 FPS at Low settings, which is the only 4K preset to reach that mark. Medium delivers 23 FPS on average, with a minimum of 19 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. High drops to 19 FPS average, while Ultra bottoms out at 15 FPS. None of these approach the 60 FPS playability threshold, and the spread between Low and Ultra is a 15 FPS gap, indicating the GPU is heavily burdened at this resolution regardless of quality level.
Moving to 2560x1440, the picture improves but remains below playable standards. Low settings produce 55 FPS average, just 5 FPS short of the threshold. Medium follows at 42 FPS, with recorded minimum and maximum of 36 and 48 FPS respectively. High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra falls to 27 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra here is a 28 FPS drop, showing that preset selection has a substantial impact at this resolution, yet even the lightest settings cannot sustain 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the combo finally reaches playable territory. Low settings average 85 FPS, comfortably above the threshold. Medium averages 65 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 75 FPS, meaning the 60 FPS line is crossed on average but dips slightly below during demanding scenes. High averages 55 FPS, just under the threshold, while Ultra averages 42 FPS. The 1080p data shows a 43 FPS difference between Low and Ultra, the largest preset scaling across all three resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this combination at 3425 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the lower percentile of all systems measured. This rank reflects the Arc B370's limited graphics throughput, which sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database. By contrast, the Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. The pairing creates a significant imbalance: the CPU is a mid-to-high tier part while the GPU is near the bottom of the performance distribution.
The combo rank of 3425 indicates that roughly 287 tested combinations deliver better performance in this game. Given that the GPU's average benchmark score is 1184 from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and that score places it alongside decade-old discrete parts, the overall ranking is expected. The CPU's strong synthetic scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 22799 and a single-core result of 3218, do little to lift the gaming outcome when the GPU is the limiting factor.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates that the Intel Arc B370 is the dominant constraint in this game. Evidence appears in the scaling between resolutions: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 85 FPS, but at 1440p Low it drops to 55 FPS, a 30 FPS reduction. At 4K Low, the average falls to 30 FPS, another 25 FPS loss. This steep resolution scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where pixel throughput dictates performance.
Preset scaling reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 20 FPS (85 to 65), from Medium to High costs 10 FPS (65 to 55), and from High to Ultra costs 13 FPS (55 to 42). The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, has ample headroom for a 2014 title like Minimum, a third-person shooter from that era. The Ryzen 5 7500F's single-thread performance, as shown by a Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3841, is more than sufficient for this game's CPU demands.
At 4K, the GPU's weakness becomes absolute: even Low settings cannot reach half the 60 FPS target. The difference between 1080p Low (85 FPS) and 4K Low (30 FPS) is a 55 FPS collapse, which cannot be attributed to CPU limitations. The Ryzen 5 7500F's multicore strength, reflected in a Passmark multithread score of 26825 and a Geekbench multicore score of 12362, ensures the processor is not the bottleneck at any resolution tested.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum, but only at 1920x1080 with specific presets. The verdict data lists Low and Medium as playable at 1080p, with Medium being the best playable setting at 65 FPS average. Low reaches 85 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. High at 1080p averages 55 FPS, which misses the playable mark, and Ultra averages 42 FPS, well below it.
At 2560x1440, no settings are playable. The closest is Low at 55 FPS, which falls short by 5 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all average below 42 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation is worse: no preset reaches 30 FPS except Low, and Ultra averages just 15 FPS. For users targeting 4K or 1440p gaming, this combination does not meet the 60 FPS standard in Minimum.
The practical takeaway: 1080p gamers can enjoy smooth frame rates on Low or Medium settings, with Medium offering the best balance at 65 FPS average. Those with 1440p or 4K displays would need to lower expectations significantly or consider different hardware.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals in the database, the Ryzen 5 7500F performs within a narrow band of comparable processors. The Intel Core i7-11850H has an average score of 24935, a 0.1% difference from the 7500F's 24964. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, 0.4% lower. Any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically in Minimum when paired with the same GPU, since the performance delta is under half a percent in every case.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B370's nearest rivals highlight its modest standing. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, just 0.2% above the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher, while the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. These alternatives would produce nearly the same frame rates in Minimum, meaning users with any of these GPUs would see similar 1080p results and equally unplayable 1440p and 4K outcomes.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?
A: Yes, at Low and Medium settings. Low averages 85 FPS and Medium averages 65 FPS, both above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra at 1080p average 55 and 42 FPS respectively, so they do not meet the playable standard.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?
A: Medium is the best playable setting, with an average of 65 FPS, a minimum of 56 FPS, and a maximum of 75 FPS.
Q: Is 1440p playable with this combination?
A: No. The closest result is Low settings at 55 FPS average, which is 5 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all average 42 FPS or lower.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964. The Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.1% lower, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.2% higher, the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core 5 210H is 0.4% lower. All perform within a half percent of each other.
Q: Does the GPU or CPU limit performance in Minimum?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile among CPUs. Resolution scaling shows a 55 FPS drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low, which indicates GPU-bound behavior.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 4K with this setup?
A: Low settings average 30 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 19 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 15 FPS. None of these are close to the 60 FPS playable threshold.